World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
51
Citations
256969
World Ranking
2478
National Ranking
1205

Fred D. Davis publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fred D. Davis sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 124 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Fred D. Davis D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fred D. Davis sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Fred D. Davis is affiliated with Texas Tech University in the United States. Their research spans several interdisciplinary fields including Social Sciences, Decision Sciences, and Psychology, with notable subfields such as Sociology and Political Science, Information Systems and Management, Cognitive Neuroscience, Applied Psychology, and Artificial Intelligence.

The primary research topics covered by Fred D. Davis include:

  • Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Media Influence and Health
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Knowledge Management and Sharing

Fred D. Davis has contributed to several peer-reviewed publication venues multiple times. These include:

  • International Journal of Information Management
  • Journal of Computer Information Systems
  • Internet Research
  • MIS Quarterly
  • Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

The scientist's recent published papers feature diverse topics related to behavior, technology use, knowledge sharing, and cognitive processes. Notable papers include:

  • A Decade of NeuroIS Research (2020), published in ACM SIGMIS Database the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems
  • Competing roles of intention and habit in predicting behavior: A comprehensive literature review, synthesis, and longitudinal field study (2023), International Journal of Information Management
  • A cultural contingency model of knowledge sharing and job performance (2021), Journal of Business Research
  • Self-Regulation, Mind Wandering, and Cognitive Absorption During Technology Use (2020), Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
  • Musical consumption, self-control and smartphone addiction: a dual-systems theory perspective and evidence from a survey study (2021), Internet Research

Their frequent coauthors include René Riedl, Jan vom Brocke, Adriane B. Randolph, Andrina Granić, and Gernot Müller-Putz, indicating collaboration across related areas of information systems and behavior.

Fred D. Davis has also contributed to book publications primarily through Springer International Publishing and Springer Nature. Titles include:

  • Information Systems and Neuroscience (2020 and 2022 editions)
  • The Technology Acceptance Model (2024)

Best Publications

  • Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology

    Fred D. Davis

  • User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view

    Viswanath Venkatesh;Michael G. Morris;Gordon B. Davis;Fred D. Davis

  • User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models

    Fred D. Davis;Richard P. Bagozzi;Paul R. Warshaw

  • A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies

    Viswanath Venkatesh;Fred D. Davis

  • Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace1

    Fred D. Davis;Richard P. Bagozzi;Paul R. Warshaw

  • A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems : theory and results

    Fred D Davis

  • User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts

    Fred D. Davis

  • A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test*

    Viswanath Venkatesh;Fred D. Davis

  • A critical assessment of potential measurement biases in the technology acceptance model: three experiments

    Fred D. Davis;Viswanath Venkatesh

  • Development and Test of a Theory of Technological Learning and Usage

    Richard P. Bagozzi;Fred D. Davis;Paul R. Warshaw

  • Disentangling behavioral intention and behavioral expectation

    Paul R Warshaw;Fred D Davis

  • Dead Or Alive? The Development, Trajectory And Future Of Technology Adoption Research.

    Viswanath Venkatesh;Fred D. Davis;Michael G. Morris

  • Toward preprototype user acceptance testing of new information systems: implications for software project management

    F.D. Davis;V. Venkatesh

  • Developing and Validating an Observational Learning Model of Computer Software Training and Skill Acquisition

    Mun Y. Yi;Fred D. Davis

  • On the use of neurophysiological tools in is research: developing a research agenda for neurois

    Angelika Dimoka;Rajiv D. Banker;Izak Benbasat;Fred D. Davis

  • Explaining software developer acceptance of methodologies: a comparison of five theoretical models

    C.K. Riemenschneider;B.C. Hardgrave;F.D. Davis

  • Research Commentary---NeuroIS: The Potential of Cognitive Neuroscience for Information Systems Research

    Angelika Dimoka;Paul A. Pavlou;Fred D. Davis

  • Investigating Determinants of Software Developers' Intentions to Follow Methodologies

    Bill C. Hardgrave;Fred D. Davis;Cynthia K. Riemenschneider

  • Improving computer skill training: Behavior modeling, symbolic mental rehearsal, and the role of knowledge structures

    Fred D. Davis;Mun Y. Yi

  • Good habits gone bad: Explaining negative consequences associated with the use of mobile phones from a dual-systems perspective

    Amr A. Soror;Bryan I. Hammer;Zachary R. Steelman;Fred D. Davis

  • A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies.: Four Longitudinal Field Studies.

    Viswanath Venkatesh;Fred D. Davis

Frequent Co-Authors

Rajiv D. Banker
Rajiv D. Banker Temple University
Peter Kenning
Peter Kenning Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Viswanath Venkatesh
Viswanath Venkatesh Virginia Tech
Jan vom Brocke
Jan vom Brocke University of Münster
Gernot R. Müller-Putz
Gernot R. Müller-Putz Graz University of Technology
Paul A. Pavlou
Paul A. Pavlou University of Miami
Izak Benbasat
Izak Benbasat University of British Columbia
Alan R. Dennis
Alan R. Dennis Indiana University
Alok Gupta
Alok Gupta University of Minnesota
Richard P. Bagozzi
Richard P. Bagozzi University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Thinking about advancing your career in Social Sciences and Humanities? Many students are choosing flexible learning through online degree programs. There are several specialized online options for those interested in counseling, psychology, and social work.

For example, if you already have a bachelor’s in another field and want to earn a Master of Social Work quickly, you may find 1 year msw programs online no bsw to be a convenient path. Psychology students seeking faster entry into the workforce should explore accelerated psychology programs tailored for online learners.

If your goal is to become a licensed counselor, it’s important to look for reputable cacrep-accredited programs online. These ensure you meet professional standards while offering cost-effective study. For those interested in marriage and family therapy, check out the cheapest online mft programs available.

Each of these academic tracks leads to rewarding roles in helping professions, supporting individuals and communities while opening doors to dynamic career opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Fred D. Davis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles