World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Social Sciences and Humanities
China
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 76 509 438 8 7 264 20194

Timothy Teo publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Timothy Teo between 1988 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Timothy Teo published across 38 years, from 1988 to 2025, averaging 7.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 30 publications in 2010. 22 of the 297 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 30. Peak 30 publications in 2010. 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 4 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 20 publications 2010: 30 publications 2011: 30 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 20 publications 2018: 18 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 17 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 10 publications
1988 2025

297 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Timothy Teo: publications per year, 1988 to 2025
Year Publications
1988 1
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 1
1998 1
1999 0
2000 0
2001 2
2002 0
2003 1
2004 1
2005 1
2006 4
2007 4
2008 13
2009 20
2010 30
2011 30
2012 13
2013 14
2014 13
2015 12
2016 10
2017 20
2018 18
2019 15
2020 17
2021 14
2022 10
2023 10
2024 12
2025 10
Total 297
Download as CSV

Timothy Teo publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Timothy Teo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 264–273 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 264 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138 264
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Timothy Teo D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Timothy Teo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 76 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 76 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45 76
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in China Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in China Leader Award

Overview

Timothy Teo is affiliated with the Chinese University of Hong Kong in China and works within the social sciences, focusing primarily on education, sociology and political science, information systems and management, social psychology, and information systems. Their research predominantly covers themes related to technology adoption and user behaviour, impact of technology on adolescents, online and blended learning, gender and technology in education, online learning and analytics, EFL/ESL teaching and learning, and AI in service interactions.

Recent publications by Timothy Teo and collaborators include:

  • Initial teacher training for twenty-first century skills in the Fourth Industrial Revolution (IR 4.0): A scoping review, 2021, Computers & Education
  • Explaining Chinese university students' continuance learning intention in the MOOC setting: A modified expectation confirmation model perspective, 2020, Computers & Education
  • Understanding continuance intention among MOOC participants: The role of habit and MOOC performance, 2020, Computers in Human Behavior
  • The influence of technology acceptance, academic self-efficacy, and gender on academic achievement through online tutoring, 2021, Computers & Education
  • Investigating the antecedents of university students' perceived ease of using the Internet for learning, 2020, Interactive Learning Environments

Timothy Teo frequently publishes in several key venues, including:

  • Computers & Education
  • PsycTESTS Dataset
  • Interactive Learning Environments
  • Educational Technology Research and Development
  • Frontiers in Psychology

Their frequent co-authors are:

  • Fang Huang
  • Natasha Anne Rappa
  • Hai Min Dai
  • Ronny Scherer
  • Ali Derakhshan

Their body of work intersects strongly with technology and education, emphasizing aspects such as learner continuance intention in MOOCs, academic self-efficacy, and teacher training for emergent skills relevant to the Fourth Industrial Revolution. The scientist's research contributes to understanding the behavioural and psychological factors influencing technology adoption in educational contexts across diverse populations. The integration of social sciences with information systems and educational technology is a notable element of their scholarly activity.

Best Publications

  • Modelling technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers

    Timothy Teo

  • Factors influencing teachers' intention to use technology: Model development and test

    Timothy Teo

  • Understanding pre-service teachers' computer attitudes: applying and extending the technology acceptance model

    Timothy Teo;Chwee Beng Lee;Ching Sing Chai

  • Pre-Service Teachers' Attitudes towards Computer Use: A Singapore Survey.

    Timothy Teo

  • An assessment of the influence of perceived enjoyment and attitude on the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers: A structural equation modeling approach

    Timothy Teo;Jan Noyes

  • Assessing the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers in Singapore and Malaysia: A multigroup invariance analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)

    Timothy Teo;Chwee Beng Lee;Ching Sing Chai;Su Luan Wong

  • A path analysis of pre-service teachers' attitudes to computer use: applying and extending the technology acceptance model in an educational context

    Timothy Teo

  • A Cross-Cultural Examination of the Intention to Use Technology between Singaporean and Malaysian Pre-Service teachers: An Application of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)

    Timothy Teo;Wong Su Luan;Chai Ching Sing

  • Application of Structural Equation Modeling in Educational Research and Practice

    Ernest Afari;Andrew Martin;Diana Mîndrilă;Diane M. Monrad

  • Beliefs about teaching and uses of technology among pre‐service teachers

    Timothy Teo;Ching Sing Chai;David Hung;Chwee Beng Lee

  • Examining the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers: an integration of the Technology Acceptance Model and Theory of Planned Behavior

    Timothy Teo

  • Explaining the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers: a multi-group analysis of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology

    Timothy Teo;Jan Noyes

  • Explaining the intention to use technology among university students: a structural equation modeling approach

    Timothy Teo;Mingming Zhou

  • Explaining the Intention to Use Technology among Student Teachers: An Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB)

    Timothy Teo;Chwee Beng Lee

  • An initial development and validation of a Digital Natives Assessment Scale (DNAS)

    Timothy Teo

  • Attitudes toward Computers: A Study of Post-Secondary Students in Singapore

    Timothy Teo

  • Examining the influence of subjective norm and facilitating conditions on the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers: a structural equation modeling of an extended technology acceptance model

    Timothy Teo

  • Explicating the influences that explain intention to use technology among English teachers in China

    Timothy Teo;Fang Huang;Cathy Ka Weng Hoi

  • Unpacking teachers’ intentions to integrate technology: A meta-analysis

    Ronny Scherer;Timothy Teo

  • Becoming more specific

    Ronny Scherer;Fazilat Siddiq;Timothy Teo

  • Epistemological beliefs on teaching and learning: a survey among pre‐service teachers in Singapore

    Ching Sing Chai;Myint Swe Khine;Timothy Teo

Frequent Co-Authors

Fang Huang
Fang Huang University of Science and Technology of China
Ching Sing Chai
Ching Sing Chai Chinese University of Hong Kong
Ronny Scherer
Ronny Scherer University of Oslo
Francisco José García-Peñalvo
Francisco José García-Peñalvo University of Salamanca
Joyce Hwee Ling Koh
Joyce Hwee Ling Koh University of Otago
Xuesong Gao
Xuesong Gao University of New South Wales
Xitao Fan
Xitao Fan Chinese University of Hong Kong
David J. Hargreaves
David J. Hargreaves AstraZeneca (United Kingdom)
Andrew J. Martin
Andrew J. Martin University of New South Wales
Gavin T. L. Brown
Gavin T. L. Brown University of Auckland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The fields of Social Sciences and Humanities offer a variety of academic paths with strong online learning options. For those interested in entering the professional world quickly, an accelerated masters in social work is a strong choice. These programs can be completed faster than traditional pathways, preparing graduates for impactful careers in diverse social service settings.

Psychology is another popular discipline. With an accelerated online bachelor's degree in psychology, students gain fundamental knowledge and can quickly move on to specialized roles or graduate study.

For those focused on counseling, accreditation is key. Choosing one of the cacrep accredited universities ensures your degree meets the highest standards and can lead to licensure and job stability.

Lastly, those drawn to relationship and family dynamics may consider an mft degree (Marriage and Family Therapy), which opens doors to specialized therapy careers helping couples and families. Each pathway offers unique opportunities and flexible learning for aspiring professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Timothy Teo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles