World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Anastasios A. Economides

Anastasios A. Economides

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 41 5005 4641 5 4 273 7970
Computer Science 42 8311 8075 58 57 303 8427

Anastasios A. Economides publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Anastasios A. Economides between 1988 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Anastasios A. Economides published across 36 years, from 1988 to 2023, averaging 9 papers a year. Output peaked at 36 publications in 2022. 47 of the 324 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 36. Peak 36 publications in 2022. 1988: 2 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 4 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 14 publications 2006: 20 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 22 publications 2009: 19 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 20 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 23 publications 2022: 36 publications 2023: 11 publications
1988 2023

324 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Anastasios A. Economides: publications per year, 1988 to 2023
Year Publications
1988 2
1989 0
1990 4
1991 1
1992 0
1993 0
1994 1
1995 4
1996 4
1997 1
1998 0
1999 2
2000 4
2001 2
2002 6
2003 5
2004 4
2005 14
2006 20
2007 14
2008 22
2009 19
2010 12
2011 9
2012 17
2013 9
2014 20
2015 10
2016 11
2017 10
2018 13
2019 7
2020 7
2021 23
2022 36
2023 11
Total 324
Download as CSV

Anastasios A. Economides publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anastasios A. Economides sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 264–273 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 273 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138 273
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Anastasios A. Economides D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anastasios A. Economides sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308 41
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • The Internet
  • Computer network
  • Artificial intelligence

His primary scientific interests are in Multimedia, Mobile device, Social psychology, Computer based and Intention to use. His work carried out in the field of Multimedia brings together such families of science as E-learning and State. Many of his research projects under Mobile device are closely connected to Information technology with Information technology, tying the diverse disciplines of science together.

Anastasios A. Economides combines subjects such as Emotion recognition, Applied psychology, Usability and Embodied cognition with his study of Social psychology. His Usability research includes themes of Social influence and Context. In his research on the topic of Intention to use, Developmental psychology is strongly related with Perception.

His most cited work include:

  • Learning Analytics and Educational Data Mining in Practice: A Systematic Literature Review of Empirical Evidence. (286 citations)
  • The acceptance and use of computer based assessment (218 citations)
  • Computer based assessment: Gender differences in perceptions and acceptance (120 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His scientific interests lie mostly in Computer network, Multimedia, Information and Communications Technology, Context and Knowledge management. His research investigates the connection between Computer network and topics such as Distributed computing that intersect with issues in Destination-Sequenced Distance Vector routing. His Multimedia research incorporates elements of Computerized adaptive testing and Mobile device.

The concepts of his Information and Communications Technology study are interwoven with issues in Analytic hierarchy process and Risk analysis. Social psychology is closely connected to Usability in his research, which is encompassed under the umbrella topic of Context. His research on Knowledge management often connects related topics like Educational technology.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Computer network (13.97%)
  • Multimedia (12.87%)
  • Information and Communications Technology (9.19%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2016-2021)?

  • Mobile device (7.72%)
  • Knowledge management (8.09%)
  • Mathematics education (5.51%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His main research concerns Mobile device, Knowledge management, Mathematics education, Cognitive psychology and Structural equation modeling. His study in Mobile device is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Session, Global engineering, Teaching method and Ubiquitous computing. As a member of one scientific family, Anastasios A. Economides mostly works in the field of Cognitive psychology, focusing on Social psychology and, on occasion, Analytics.

The study incorporates disciplines such as Educational technology and Technology acceptance model in addition to Structural equation modeling. His Technology acceptance model study necessitates a more in-depth grasp of Usability. His Usability research incorporates themes from Context, Facial expression and Surprise.

Between 2016 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Mobile-based assessment: integrating acceptance and motivational factors into a combined model of self-determination theory and technology acceptance (93 citations)
  • Mobile-based assessment (85 citations)
  • Mobile-Based Micro-Learning and Assessment: Impact on Learning Performance and Motivation of High School Students. (35 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • The Internet
  • Computer network
  • Artificial intelligence

Anastasios A. Economides focuses on Mobile device, Mathematics education, Technology acceptance model, Structural equation modeling and Perception. His Mobile device research is multidisciplinary, relying on both E-learning, Educational technology, Distributed computing and Networking hardware. His study in the field of Academic achievement, Teaching method and Self-regulated learning is also linked to topics like Time management.

His Technology acceptance model research is included under the broader classification of Usability. His work in Structural equation modeling covers topics such as Knowledge management which are related to areas like Intention to use, Competence and Mobile technology. His Perception study also includes fields such as

  • Context which is related to area like Social psychology,
  • Informatics together with Cognitive psychology.

Best Publications

  • Learning Analytics and Educational Data Mining in Practice: A Systematic Literature Review of Empirical Evidence.

    Zacharoula K. Papamitsiou;Anastasios A. Economides

  • The acceptance and use of computer based assessment

    Vasileios Terzis;Anastasios A. Economides

  • Mobile-based assessment: integrating acceptance and motivational factors into a combined model of self-determination theory and technology acceptance

    Stavros A. Nikou;Anastasios A. Economides

  • Mobile-based assessment

    Stavros A. Nikou;Anastasios A. Economides

  • Computer based assessment: Gender differences in perceptions and acceptance

    Vasileios Terzis;Anastasios A. Economides

  • Mobile-Based micro-Learning and Assessment: Impact on learning performance and motivation of high school students

    Stavros A. Nikou;Anastasios A. Economides

  • The impact of paper-based, computer-based and mobile-based self-assessment on students' science motivation and achievement

    Stavros A. Nikou;Anastasios A. Economides

  • The design and evaluation of a computerized adaptive test on mobile devices

    Evangelos Triantafillou;Elissavet Georgiadou;Anastasios A. Economides

  • Mobile-based assessment: A literature review of publications in major referred journals from 2009 to 2018

    Stavros A. Nikou;Anastasios A. Economides

  • The effect of emotional feedback on behavioral intention to use computer based assessment

    Vasileios Terzis;Christos N. Moridis;Anastasios A. Economides

  • Culture-Aware Collaborative Learning.

    Anastasios A. Economides

  • A Review of Item Exposure Control Strategies for Computerized Adaptive Testing Developed from 1983 to 2005

    Peter S. Lynch;Elissavet Georgiadou;Evangelos Triantafillou;Anastasios A. Economides

  • How student's personality traits affect Computer Based Assessment Acceptance: Integrating BFI with CBAAM

    Vasileios Terzis;Christos N. Moridis;Anastasios A. Economides

  • Use of mobile phones by male and female Greek students

    Anastasios A. Economides;Amalia Grousopoulou

  • Teachers' Digital Skills Readiness During COVID-19 Pandemic

    Maria Perifanou;Anastasios A Economides;Katerina Tzafilkou

  • Measuring instant emotions based on facial expressions during computer-based assessment

    Vasileios Terzis;Christos N. Moridis;Anastasios A. Economides

  • Adaptive context-aware pervasive and ubiquitous learning

    Anastasios A. Economides

  • Students' thoughts about the importance and costs of their mobile devices' features and services

    Anastasios A. Economides;Amalia Grousopoulou

  • Measuring instant emotions during a self-assessment test: the use of FaceReader

    Vasileios Terzis;Christos N. Moridis;Anastasios A. Economides

  • Continuance acceptance of computer based assessment through the integration of user's expectations and perceptions

    Vasileios Terzis;Christos N. Moridis;Anastasios A. Economides

  • A Decision Analysis Framework for Prioritizing a Portfolio of ICT Infrastructure Projects

    G.N. Angelou;A.A. Economides

Frequent Co-Authors

Panagiotis G. Sarigiannidis
Panagiotis G. Sarigiannidis University of Western Macedonia
Panagiotis D. Bamidis
Panagiotis D. Bamidis Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Michail N. Giannakos
Michail N. Giannakos Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Wei Yu
Wei Yu Towson University
Wei Zhao
Wei Zhao Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology
Angel A. Juan
Angel A. Juan Universitat Politècnica de València
Xinwen Fu
Xinwen Fu University of Massachusetts Lowell
Ilias O. Pappas
Ilias O. Pappas Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Houbing Song
Houbing Song University of Maryland, Baltimore County
Tansu Alpcan
Tansu Alpcan University of Melbourne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens up a wealth of flexible education options. Students seeking to balance work and study often choose accelerated programs to fast-track their learning. For instance, accelerated online degrees enable learners to complete their bachelor’s qualification faster than traditional routes, making it easier to kickstart careers in fields like sociology, psychology, or education.

Graduate studies are also flexible thanks to online master programs that can be completed in just one year. Additionally, those pursuing advanced roles in education can opt for online edd programs designed for working professionals looking for leadership positions.

Cost is a major consideration for many students. Programs such as the online psychology masters offer both affordability and academic flexibility, making postgraduate education more accessible. Online degrees not only open doors to diverse career paths but also help students manage time and finances effectively.

Best Scientists Citing Anastasios A. Economides

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles