World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 56 3717 3550 95 90 172 9431

Theo C.M. Brock publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Theo C.M. Brock between 1981 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Theo C.M. Brock published across 44 years, from 1981 to 2024, averaging 4 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2008. 1 of the 176 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2008. 1981: 1 publication 1982: 1 publication 1983: 2 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 2 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 4 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication
1981 2024

176 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Theo C.M. Brock: publications per year, 1981 to 2024
Year Publications
1981 1
1982 1
1983 2
1984 2
1985 4
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 3
1990 0
1991 1
1992 2
1993 2
1994 2
1995 3
1996 6
1997 3
1998 7
1999 1
2000 4
2001 2
2002 4
2003 0
2004 8
2005 7
2006 10
2007 6
2008 13
2009 5
2010 3
2011 5
2012 3
2013 4
2014 6
2015 8
2016 11
2017 10
2018 11
2019 6
2020 2
2021 5
2022 2
2023 0
2024 1
Total 176
Download as CSV

Theo C.M. Brock publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Theo C.M. Brock sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 171–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 172 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444 172
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Theo C.M. Brock D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Theo C.M. Brock sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202 56
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Theo C.M. Brock is affiliated with Wageningen University & Research in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with specific contributions to agricultural and biological sciences. The scientist's work encompasses various subfields, including pollution, health, toxicology and mutagenesis, food science, sociology and political science, and plant science.

Their research topics cover multiple aspects of environmental studies, notably:

  • Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
  • Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
  • Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
  • Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
  • Risk Perception and Management
  • Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
  • Agricultural Safety and Regulations

Theo C.M. Brock has contributed scholarly articles to several journals, including Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, and Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. Key recent publications include:

  • Application of General Unified Threshold Models of Survival Models for Regulatory Aquatic Pesticide Risk Assessment Illustrated with an Example for the Insecticide Chlorpyrifos, 2020, Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
  • Open Science in regulatory environmental risk assessment, 2021, Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
  • Sediment toxicity of the fungicide fludioxonil to benthic macroinvertebrates -evaluation of the tiered effect assessment procedure, 2020, Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety

The coauthors that frequently collaborate with Theo C.M. Brock include:

  • Andreas Focks
  • Xiao Hui Yin
  • Jian Sun
  • Pengfei Xiao
  • Guonian Zhu

Their frequent publication venues are:

  • Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
  • Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
  • Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
  • Research Square (Research Square)
  • EFSA Supporting Publications

Theo C.M. Brock's research contributions advance the understanding of environmental risks related to pesticides and their ecological effects, regulatory assessment methodologies, and open science in environmental risk assessment contexts.

Best Publications

  • Guidance on tiered risk assessment for plant protection products for aquatic organisms in edge-of-field surface waters

    A. Aagaard;T.C.M. Brock;E. Capri;S. Duquesne

  • Insecticide species sensitivity distributions: importance of test species selection and relevance to aquatic ecosystems

    Lorraine Maltby;Naomi Blake;Theo C. M. Brock;Paul J. Van den Brink

  • Guidance on the assessment of the safety of feed additives for the environment.

    Vasileios Bampidis;Maria Bastos;Henrik Christensen;Birgit Dusemund

  • Fungicide risk assessment for aquatic ecosystems: importance of interspecific variation, toxic mode of action, and exposure regime.

    Lorraine Maltby;Theo C M Brock;Paul J Van den Brink

  • Threshold levels for effects of insecticides in freshwater ecosystems: a review

    René P A Van Wijngaarden;Theo C M Brock;Paul J Van den Brink

  • Effects of the insecticide dursban® 4E (active ingredient chlorpyrifos) in outdoor experimental ditches: II. Invertebrate community responses and recovery

    Paul J. van den Brink;René P. A. Van Wijngaarden;Wil G. H. Lucassen;Theo C. M. Brock

  • Impact of the fungicide carbendazim in freshwater microcosms. I. Water quality, breakdown of particulate organic matter and responses of macroinvertebrates.

    J. G. M. Cuppen;P. J. van den Brink;E. Camps;K. F. Uil

  • Comparison of tropical and temperate freshwater animal species' acute sensitivities to chemicals: Implications for deriving safe extrapolation factors: Tropical versus Temperate Species Sensitivity

    Kevin Wh Kwok;Kenneth My Leung;Gilbert Sg Lui;Vincent Kh Chu

  • Aquatic Risks of Pesticides, Ecological Protection Goals, and Common Aims in European Union Legislation

    Theo C. M. Brock;Gertie H. P. Arts;Lorraine Maltby;Paul J. Van den Brink

  • Comparison of Tropical and Temperate Freshwater Animal Species' Acute Sensitivities to Chemicals: Implications for Deriving Safe Extrapolation Factors

    Kevin W H Kwok;Kenneth M Y Leung;Gilbert S G Lui;S Vincent K H Chu

  • Development of a framework based on an ecosystem services approach for deriving specific protection goals for environmental risk assessment of pesticides

    Karin M. Nienstedt;Theo C. M. Brock;Joke van Wensem;Mark Montforts

  • Scientific Opinion addressing the state of the science on risk assessment of plant protection products for in-soil organisms

    Colin Ockleford;Paulien Adriaanse;Philippe Berny;Theodorus Brock

  • Scientific Opinion on the state of the art of Toxicokinetic/Toxicodynamic (TKTD) effect models for regulatory risk assessment of pesticides for aquatic organisms

    Colin Ockleford;Paulien Adriaanse;Philippe Berny;Theodorus Brock

  • Predictive Value of Species Sensitivity Distributions for Effects of Herbicides in Freshwater Ecosystems

    P.J. van den Brink;N. Blake;T.C.M. Brock;L. Maltby

  • Sensitivity of macrophyte-dominated freshwater microcosms to chronic levels of the herbicide linuron. I. Primary producers.

    P.J. van den Brink;E.M. Hartgers;U. Fettweis;S.J.H. Crum

  • Effects of preservation on dry- and ash-free dry weight biomass of some common aquatic macro-invertebrates

    Rob S. E. W. Leuven;Theo C. M. Brock;Hans A. M. van Druten

  • Effects of chronic low concentrations of the pesticides chlorpyrifos and atrazine in indoor freshwater microcosms

    Paul J. van den Brink;Ellen van Donk;Ronald Gylstra;Steven J.H. Crum

  • Comparison of laboratory single species and field population-level effects of the pyrethroid insecticide lambda-cyhalothrin on freshwater invertebrates

    A.F.W. Schroer;J.D.M. Belgers;T.C.M. Brock;A.M. Matser

  • Fate and effects of the insecticide Dursban 4E in indoor Elodea-dominated and macrophyte-free freshwater model ecosystems: I. Fate and primary effects of the active ingredient chlorpyrifos.

    T. C. M. Brock;S. J. H. Crum;R. van Wijngaarden;B. J. Budde

  • Effects of the insecticide dursban® 4E (active ingredient chlorpyrifos) in outdoor experimental ditches: I. Comparison of short‐term toxicity between the laboratory and the field

    René P. A. van Wijngaarden;Paul J. van den Brink;Steven J. H. Crum;Theo C. M. Brock

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul J. Van den Brink
Paul J. Van den Brink Wageningen University & Research
Lorraine Maltby
Lorraine Maltby University of Sheffield
Keith R. Solomon
Keith R. Solomon University of Guelph
Albert A. Koelmans
Albert A. Koelmans Wageningen University & Research
Leo Posthuma
Leo Posthuma Radboud University
Matthias Liess
Matthias Liess Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Paul K. Sibley
Paul K. Sibley University of Guelph
Colin D. Brown
Colin D. Brown University of York
Hauke Smidt
Hauke Smidt Wageningen University & Research
Jörg Romeis
Jörg Romeis University of Bern

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring environmental sciences can open doors to diverse career opportunities that blend science, policy, and community engagement. For those considering advanced education, numerous online options cater to specialties aligned with environmental studies. For instance, professionals seeking leadership roles in education may find pathways from eds to edd programs beneficial, providing advanced credentials without geographic constraints.

When pursuing doctoral studies, convenience and flexibility are often important. The availability of doctoral programs online no dissertation offers an alternative route to higher qualifications, especially for those balancing careers and family commitments.

Career options closely linked to environmental sciences may also include social work roles focused on community well-being and sustainability. Thus, exploring cheapest online dsw programs can provide affordable routes to specialized expertise in this interdisciplinary field.

For students seeking broad foundational knowledge before specializing, the best affordable online general studies degree programs offer flexible and cost-effective options. These degrees can serve as stepping stones toward more focused environmental science careers or graduate education.

Best Scientists Citing Theo C.M. Brock

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles