World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 58 3264 3122 86 81 180 12469

Leo Posthuma publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Leo Posthuma between 1988 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Leo Posthuma published across 38 years, from 1988 to 2025, averaging 5.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2019. 10 of the 203 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2019. 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 6 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 20 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 6 publications
1988 2025

203 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Leo Posthuma: publications per year, 1988 to 2025
Year Publications
1988 1
1989 0
1990 1
1991 0
1992 2
1993 3
1994 1
1995 1
1996 0
1997 5
1998 1
1999 2
2000 2
2001 7
2002 6
2003 2
2004 1
2005 6
2006 11
2007 13
2008 10
2009 6
2010 3
2011 5
2012 8
2013 5
2014 12
2015 6
2016 4
2017 11
2018 7
2019 20
2020 9
2021 4
2022 14
2023 4
2024 4
2025 6
Total 203
Download as CSV

Leo Posthuma publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leo Posthuma sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 171–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 180 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444 180
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Leo Posthuma D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leo Posthuma sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166 58
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Leo Posthuma is affiliated with Radboud University in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with significant contributions in the subfields of health, toxicology and mutagenesis, pollution, nature and landscape conservation, environmental chemistry, and ecology.

The scientist's main topics of work encompass environmental toxicology and ecotoxicology, pharmaceutical and antibiotic environmental impacts, fish ecology and management studies, toxic organic pollutants impact, pesticide and herbicide environmental studies, species distribution and climate change, and hydrology and watershed management studies.

Leo Posthuma has coauthored extensively with several researchers including Peter Fantke, Jaap Slootweg, Dick de Zwart, Michael Zwicky Hauschild, and Sebastian Birk.

Their research has been published in various venues, with repeated contributions to:

  • Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
  • Environment International
  • Environmental Sciences Europe
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management

Recent papers include:

  • Impacts of multiple stressors on freshwater biota across spatial scales and ecosystems (2020), published in Nature Ecology & Evolution
  • Multiple stressors determine river ecological status at the European scale: Towards an integrated understanding of river status deterioration (2020), published in Global Change Biology
  • A risk based assessment approach for chemical mixtures from wastewater treatment plant effluents (2022), published in Environment International
  • Chemical pollution imposes limitations to the ecological status of European surface waters (2020), published in Scientific Reports
  • The NORMAN Association and the European Partnership for Chemicals Risk Assessment (PARC): let's cooperate! (2020), published in Environmental Sciences Europe

Best Publications

  • Species Sensitivity Distributions in Ecotoxicology

    Leo Posthuma;Glenn W. Suter;Theo P. Traas

  • Impacts of multiple stressors on freshwater biota across spatial scales and ecosystems.

    Sebastian Birk;Daniel Chapman;Laurence Carvalho;Bryan M. Spears

  • Guidance on harmonised methodologies for human health, animal health and ecological risk assessment of combined exposure to multiple chemicals

    Simon John More;Vasileios Bampidis;Diane Benford

  • Complex mixture toxicity for single and multiple species: Proposed methodologies

    Dick de Zwart;Leo Posthuma

  • Heavy-metal adaptation in terrestrial invertebrates: a review of occurrence, genetics, physiology and ecological consequences

    Leo Posthuma;Nico M. Van Straalen

  • Towards the review of the European Union Water Framework Directive: Recommendations for more efficient assessment and management of chemical contamination in European surface water resources.

    Werner Brack;Werner Brack;Valeria Dulio;Marlene Ågerstrand;Ian Allan

  • Multiple stressors determine river ecological status at the European scale: Towards an integrated understanding of river status deterioration.

    Jan U Lemm;Markus Venohr;Lidija Globevnik;Kostas Stefanidis

  • Equilibrium partitioning of heavy metals in Dutch field soils. I. Relationship between metal partition coefficients and soil characteristics

    René P. T. Janssen;Willie J. G. M. Peijnenburg;Leo Posthuma;Marc A. G. T. Van Den Hoop

  • Statement on advancing the assessment of chemical mixtures and their risks for human health and the environment.

    Elina Drakvik;Elina Drakvik;Rolf Altenburger;Yasunobu Aoki;Thomas Backhaus

  • SPECIES SENSITIVITY DISTRIBUTIONS FOR USE IN ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT OF AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS FOR 12,386 CHEMICALS

    Leo Posthuma;Jos van Gils;Michiel C. Zijp;Dik van de Meent

  • A Conceptual Framework for Implementation of Bioavailability of Metals for Environmental Management Purposes

    W.J.G.M. Peijnenburg;L. Posthuma;H.J.P. Eijsackers;H.E. Allen

  • Effect-based methods are key. The European Collaborative Project SOLUTIONS recommends integrating effect-based methods for diagnosis and monitoring of water quality

    Werner Brack;Selim Ait Aissa;Thomas Backhaus;Valeria Dulio

  • The SOLUTIONS project: challenges and responses for present and future emerging pollutants in land and water resources management.

    Werner Brack;Rolf Altenburger;Gerrit Schüürmann;Martin Krauss

  • Relating environmental availability to bioavailability: soil-type-dependent metal accumulation in the oligochaete Eisenia andrei.

    W. J. G. M. Peijnenburg;R. Baerselman;A. C. De Groot;T. Jager

  • LCIA framework and cross-cutting issues guidance within the UNEP-SETAC Life Cycle Initiative

    Francesca Verones;Jane Bare;Cecile Bulle;Rolf Frischknecht

  • State of the art of contaminated site management in The Netherlands: policy framework and risk assessment tools.

    F.A. Swartjes;M. Rutgers;J.P.A. Lijzen;P.J.C.M. Janssen

  • Equilibrium partitioning of heavy metals in dutch field soils. II. Prediction of metal accumulation in earthworms

    René P. T. Janssen;Leo Posthuma;Rob Baerselman;Henri A. Den Hollander

  • Quantification of Metal Bioavailability for Lettuce ( Lactuca sativa L.) in Field Soils

    W. Peijnenburg;R. Baerselman;A. de Groot;T. Jager

  • A risk based assessment approach for chemical mixtures from wastewater treatment plant effluents.

    Unknown

  • Prediction of Metal Bioavailability in Dutch Field Soils for the Oligochaete Enchytraeus crypticus

    W.J.G.M. Peijnenburg;L. Posthuma;P.G.P.C. Zweers;R. Baerselman

  • Adaptation to soil pollution by cadmium excretion in natural populations of Orchesella cincta (L.) (Collembola).

    L. Posthuma;R. F. Hogervorst;N. M. Van Straalen

Frequent Co-Authors

Werner Brack
Werner Brack Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Rolf Altenburger
Rolf Altenburger Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Dik van de Meent
Dik van de Meent Radboud University
Scott D. Dyer
Scott D. Dyer LeTourneau University
Mark A. J. Huijbregts
Mark A. J. Huijbregts Radboud University
John Munthe
John Munthe IVL - Swedish Environmental Research Institute
Thomas Backhaus
Thomas Backhaus University of Gothenburg
Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg
Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg Leiden University
Martina G. Vijver
Martina G. Vijver Leiden University
Michiel Rutgers
Michiel Rutgers Axpo (Switzerland)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students pursuing Environmental Sciences, several related online degrees can broaden career prospects. Programs like online geology programs provide a strong foundation in earth sciences, helping graduates understand natural processes essential for environmental management.

Geographic data is crucial in environmental decision-making. Degree options such as best gis schools offer training in Geographic Information Systems, preparing students to analyze spatial data and support conservation efforts.

For those interested in leadership roles within public sectors, obtaining a Master of Public Administration (MPA) can be invaluable. One can explore top-ranked one year mpa programs that emphasize policy, management, and sustainability—skills essential for shaping environmental policies.

Additionally, interdisciplinary knowledge gained from social sciences enhances understanding of human-environment interactions. Completing an online bachelors in sociology equips students with insights into societal behaviors, which are critical for effective environmental advocacy and planning.

Best Scientists Citing Leo Posthuma

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles