World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Michael Zwicky Hauschild

Michael Zwicky Hauschild

Award Badge
Environmental Sciences
Denmark
2026
Award Badge
Engineering and Technology
Denmark
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
97
Citations
38866
World Ranking
431
National Ranking
4

Michael Zwicky Hauschild publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Zwicky Hauschild sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 443 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Michael Zwicky Hauschild D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Zwicky Hauschild sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 97 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in Denmark Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in Denmark Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Engineering and Technology in Denmark Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in Denmark Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Engineering and Technology in Denmark Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in Denmark Leader Award

Overview

Michael Zwicky Hauschild is affiliated with the Technical University of Denmark in Denmark. Their research primarily revolves around environmental science and engineering, with a focus on sustainability and industrial processes.

The scientist has contributed to various fields of study including:

  • Environmental Science
  • Engineering

Their subfields of specialization cover:

  • Environmental Engineering
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
  • Strategy and Management
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
  • Building and Construction

Michael Zwicky Hauschild's research addresses multiple interrelated topics, notably:

  • Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
  • Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
  • Extraction and Separation Processes
  • Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
  • Global Energy and Sustainability Research

The scientist has published extensively, with influential papers that include:

  • "Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities," 2022, Environmental Science & Technology
  • "Efficiency stagnation in global steel production urges joint supply- and demand-side mitigation efforts," 2021, Nature Communications
  • "Review of life-cycle based methods for absolute environmental sustainability assessment and their applications," 2020, Environmental Research Letters
  • "Closed-loop systems to circular economy: A pathway to environmental sustainability?" 2022, CIRP Annals
  • "LC-IMPACT: A regionalized life cycle damage assessment method," 2020, Journal of Industrial Ecology

Frequent publication venues where their work appears include:

  • Procedia CIRP
  • CIRP Annals
  • Environmental Science & Technology
  • Journal of Industrial Ecology
  • Resources Conservation and Recycling

Collaboration is a notable aspect of their research, with frequent co-authors being:

  • Alexis Laurent
  • Mikołaj Owsianiak
  • Morten Ryberg
  • Sami Kara
  • Peter Fantke

Best Publications

  • Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment.

    Göran Finnveden;Michael Z. Hauschild;Tomas Ekvall;Jeroen B. Guinée

  • USEtox—the UNEP-SETAC toxicity model: recommended characterisation factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment

    Ralph K. Rosenbaum;Till M. Bachmann;Lois Swirsky Gold;Mark A. J. Huijbregts

  • Environmental Assessment of Products: Volume 1 Methodology, Tools and Case Studies in Product Development

    Henrik Wenzel;Michael Zwicky Hauschild;Leo Alting

  • Environmental assessment of products

    Henrik Wenzel;Michael Hauschild;Leo Alting

  • Review of LCA studies of solid waste management systems--part I: lessons learned and perspectives.

    Alexis Laurent;Ioannis Bakas;Julie Clavreul;Anna Bernstad

  • Life Cycle Assessment - Theory and Practice

    Michael Zwicky Hauschild;Ralph K. Rosenbaum;Stig Irving Olsen

  • Identifying best existing practice for characterization modeling in life cycle impact assessment

    Michael Zwicky Hauschild;Mark Goedkoop;Jeroen Guinée;Reinout Heijungs

  • Environmental Assessment of Products: Volume 2: Scientific Background

    Michael Zwicky Hauschild;Henrik Wenzel

  • Methodologies for social life cycle assessment

    Andreas Jørgensen;Agathe Le Bocq;Liudmila Nazarkina;Michael Hauschild

  • A Framework for Social Life Cycle Impact Assessment (10 pp)

    Louise Camilla Dreyer;Michael Zwicky Hauschild;Jens Schierbeck

  • Comparison of three different LCIA methods: EDIP97, CML2001 and Eco-indicator 99. Does it matter which one you choose

    Louise Camilla Dreyer;Anne Louise Niemann;Michael Zwicky Hauschild

  • From Life Cycle Assessment to Sustainable Production: Status and Perspectives

    Michael Zwicky Hauschild;Jack Jeswiet;Leo Alting

  • Review of LCA studies of solid waste management systems - Part II: Methodological guidance for a better practice.

    Alexis Laurent;Julie Clavreul;Anna Bernstad;Ioannis Bakas

  • IMPACT World+: a globally regionalized life cycle impact assessment method

    Cécile Bulle;Cécile Bulle;Manuele Margni;Laure Patouillard;Laure Patouillard;Anne-Marie Boulay

  • Limitations of carbon footprint as indicator of environmental sustainability.

    Alexis Laurent;Stig I. Olsen;Michael Z. Hauschild

  • Best available practice regarding impact categories and category indicators in life cycle impact assessment

    Helias A. Udo de Haes;Olivier Jolliet;Göran Finnveden;Michael Hauschild

  • Key issues and options in accounting for carbon sequestration and temporary storage in life cycle assessment and carbon footprinting

    Miguel Brandao;Annie Levasseur;Miko U. F. Kirschbaum;Bo P. Weidema

  • Building a model based on scientific consensus for Life Cycle Impact Assessment of chemicals: the search for harmony and parsimony.

    Michael Z. Hauschild;Mark Huijbregts;Olivier Jolliet;Matt Macleod

  • Life-Cycle Impact Assessment: Striving towards Best Practice

    H.A Udo de Haes;G Finnveden;M Goedkoop;M Hauschild

  • Supply chain collaboration in industrial symbiosis networks

    Gábor Herczeg;Gábor Herczeg;Renzo Akkerman;Michael Zwicky Hauschild

  • C balance, carbon dioxide emissions and global warming potentials in LCA-modelling of waste management systems:

    Thomas H. Christensen;Emmanuel Christophe Gentil;Alessio Boldrin;Anna W. Larsen

  • Environmental assessment of solid waste systems and technologies: EASEWASTE

    Janus Torsten Kirkeby;Harpa Birgisdottir;Trine Lund Hansen;Thomas Højlund Christensen

  • USEtox fate and ecotoxicity factors for comparative assessment of toxic emissions in life cycle analysis: sensitivity to key chemical properties

    Ralph K. Rosenbaum;Mark Huijbregts;Andrew D. Henderson;Manuele Margni

  • Drivers and barriers for implementation of environmental strategies in manufacturing companies

    Niki Bey;Michael Zwicky Hauschild;Tim C. McAloone

  • Methodology, tools and case studies in product development

    Henrik Wenzel;Michael Hauschild;Leo Alting

Frequent Co-Authors

Alexis Laurent
Alexis Laurent Technical University of Denmark
Olivier Jolliet
Olivier Jolliet University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Henrik Wenzel
Henrik Wenzel University of Southern Denmark
Manuele Margni
Manuele Margni Polytechnique Montréal
Peter Fantke
Peter Fantke Technical University of Denmark
Mark A. J. Huijbregts
Mark A. J. Huijbregts Radboud University
Thomas Højlund Christensen
Thomas Højlund Christensen Technical University of Denmark
Sami Kara
Sami Kara University of New South Wales
Jeroen B. Guinée
Jeroen B. Guinée Leiden University
Dik van de Meent
Dik van de Meent Radboud University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences opens up diverse career opportunities, often supported by related fields such as geology, GIS, and general studies. Many students consider an online general studies degree affordable option as a flexible starting point. These programs allow learners to gain foundational knowledge while managing costs effectively.

For those exploring easier pathways into environmental fields, knowing what's the easiest bachelor's degree to get can help in selecting a program aligned with their strengths. Many students find practical, applied sciences disciplines accessible without compromising career prospects.

Specialized degrees such as a geologist degree online provide critical skills for understanding Earth's processes, a crucial component of environmental science. These programs often combine theoretical knowledge with hands-on experience.

Geographic Information Systems (GIS) are essential tools for environmental analysis and decision-making. The best GIS programs in the US offer advanced training in spatial data management, enhancing career pathways in conservation, urban planning, and resource management.

Best Scientists Citing Michael Zwicky Hauschild

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles