World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 32 9618 9204 124 121 114 4745

Camille Li publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Camille Li between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Camille Li published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 6.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2022. 24 of the 172 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2022. 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 0 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 0 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 22 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 12 publications
2001 2025

172 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Camille Li: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 1
2002 0
2003 1
2004 0
2005 1
2006 0
2007 0
2008 2
2009 5
2010 3
2011 2
2012 6
2013 6
2014 9
2015 4
2016 11
2017 15
2018 14
2019 13
2020 12
2021 9
2022 22
2023 12
2024 12
2025 12
Total 172
Download as CSV

Camille Li publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Camille Li sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 114 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541 114
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Camille Li D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Camille Li sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51 32
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Camille Li is affiliated with the University of Bergen in Norway and has a significant research portfolio in Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science. Their scholarly activity focuses extensively on Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, and Oceanography, with additional contributions to Astronomy and Astrophysics, as well as Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis.

Their research topics cover a range of subjects, particularly:

  • Climate variability and models
  • Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
  • Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Climate change and permafrost
  • Cryospheric studies and observations
  • Geology and Paleoclimatology Research

Li's work has been published in several frequent venues, indicating a consistent contribution to specific scientific communities:

  • Weather and Climate Dynamics
  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Journal of Climate
  • Climate Dynamics

Several papers illustrate the recent directions of Li's research. These include:

  • Nordic Seas Heat Loss, Atlantic Inflow, and Arctic Sea Ice Cover Over the Last Century, 2021, Reviews of Geophysics
  • Intermittency of Arctic-mid-latitude teleconnections: stratospheric pathway between autumn sea ice and the winter North Atlantic Oscillation, 2020, Weather and Climate Dynamics
  • Control of Barents Sea Wintertime Cyclone Variability by Large-Scale Atmospheric Flow, 2020, Geophysical Research Letters
  • The role of Rossby waves in polar weather and climate, 2023, Weather and Climate Dynamics
  • North Atlantic Oscillation in winter is largely insensitive to autumn Barents-Kara sea ice variability, 2021, Science Advances

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Camille Li include:

  • Erica Madonna
  • Martin P. King
  • Etienne Dunn-Sigouin
  • Clemens Spensberger
  • Stefan Sobolowski

Best Publications

  • Storm track processes and the opposing influences of climate change

    T. A. Shaw;M. Baldwin;E. A. Barnes;Rodrigo Caballero

  • THE ROLE OF THE BARENTS SEA IN THE ARCTIC CLIMATE SYSTEM

    Lars H. Smedsrud;Igor Esau;Randi B. Ingvaldsen;Tor Eldevik;Tor Eldevik

  • Aridification of the Sahara desert caused by Tethys Sea shrinkage during the Late Miocene

    Zhongshi Zhang;Gilles Ramstein;Mathieu Schuster;Camille Li

  • Dansgaard-Oeschger cycles: Interactions between ocean and sea ice intrinsic to the Nordic seas

    Trond Martin Dokken;Kerim Hestnes Nisancioglu;Kerim Hestnes Nisancioglu;Camille Li;Camille Li;David Stephen Battisti;David Stephen Battisti

  • Abrupt climate shifts in Greenland due to displacements of the sea ice edge

    Camille Li;David S. Battisti;Daniel P. Schrag;Eli Tziperman

  • Can North Atlantic Sea Ice Anomalies Account for Dansgaard–Oeschger Climate Signals?

    Camille Li;David S. Battisti;Cecilia M. Bitz

  • Consequences of future increased Arctic runoff on Arctic Ocean stratification, circulation, and sea ice cover

    Aleksi Nummelin;Mehmet Ilicak;Camille Li;Lars Henrik Smedsrud

  • Observed Atmospheric Coupling between Barents Sea Ice and the Warm-Arctic Cold-Siberian Anomaly Pattern

    Svetlana A. Sorokina;Camille Li;Justin J. Wettstein;Nils Gunnar Kvamstø

  • Coupled atmosphere-ice-ocean dynamics in Dansgaard-Oeschger events

    Camille Li;Camille Li;Andreas Born;Andreas Born

  • Reduced Atlantic Storminess during Last Glacial Maximum: Evidence from a Coupled Climate Model

    Camille Li;David S. Battisti

  • The key role of topography in altering North Atlantic atmospheric circulation during the last glacial period

    Francesco S. R. Pausata;Francesco S. R. Pausata;Camille Li;Camille Li;Justin Wettstein;Justin Wettstein;M. Kageyama

  • Thermally Driven and Eddy-Driven Jet Variability in Reanalysis*

    Camille Li;Justin J. Wettstein

  • Connecting ocean heat transport changes from the midlatitudes to the Arctic Ocean

    Aleksi Nummelin;Aleksi Nummelin;Camille Li;Camille Li;Paul J. Hezel;Paul J. Hezel

  • A brief history of climate – the northern seas from the Last Glacial Maximum to global warming

    Tor Eldevik;Bjørg Risebrobakken;Anne E. Bjune;Carin Andersson

  • The link between eddy-driven jet variability and weather regimes in the North Atlantic-European sector

    Erica Madonna;Erica Madonna;Camille Li;Camille Li;Christian M. Grams;Tim Woollings

  • Intermittency of Arctic–mid-latitude teleconnections: stratospheric pathway between autumn sea ice and the winter North Atlantic Oscillation

    Peter Yu Feng Siew;Peter Yu Feng Siew;Camille Li;Camille Li;Stefan Pieter Sobolowski;Martin Peter King

  • Daily to Decadal Modulation of Jet Variability

    Tim Woollings;Elizabeth Barnes;Brian Hoskins;Brian Hoskins;Young Oh Kwon

  • Mismatch between the depth habitat of planktonic foraminifera and the calibration depth of SST transfer functions may bias reconstructions

    R J Telford;R J Telford;C Li;C Li;Michal Kucera

  • Importance of Late Fall ENSO Teleconnection in the Euro-Atlantic Sector

    Martin P. King;Ivana Herceg-Bulić;Ileana Bladé;Javier García-Serrano

  • Reassessing Sea Ice Drift and Its Relationship to Long-Term Arctic Sea Ice Loss in Coupled Climate Models

    Neil F. Tandon;Paul J. Kushner;David Docquier;Justin J. Wettstein

  • Transient stratification as the cause of the North Pacific productivity spike during deglaciation

    Phoebe J. Lam;Laura F. Robinson;Laura F. Robinson;Jerzy Blusztajn;Camille Li;Camille Li

Frequent Co-Authors

David S. Battisti
David S. Battisti University of Washington
Trond Iversen
Trond Iversen Norwegian Meteorological Institute
Kerim H. Nisancioglu
Kerim H. Nisancioglu University of Bergen
Lars Henrik Smedsrud
Lars Henrik Smedsrud University of Bergen
Trond Dokken
Trond Dokken NORCE Research
Mats Bentsen
Mats Bentsen NORCE Research
Øyvind Seland
Øyvind Seland Norwegian Meteorological Institute
Christoph Heinze
Christoph Heinze University of Bergen
Jan S. Fuglestvedt
Jan S. Fuglestvedt Center for International Climate and Environmental Research
Tim Woollings
Tim Woollings University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can broaden career opportunities and provide specialized knowledge. Many aspiring professionals opt for programs like the dsw programs, blending environmental work with community and social welfare initiatives. These degrees emphasize sustainable practices within social contexts.

Those looking for flexible and cost-effective education options may consider an online general studies degree affordable. Such programs allow students to design interdisciplinary curricula that include environmental topics, making them ideal for pursuing niche interests within the field.

For individuals seeking a less intensive pathway, some of the easiest bachelor degree to get options might align well, especially when paired with relevant internships or certifications. These degrees help build foundational knowledge without overwhelming coursework.

Lastly, those passionate about the earth sciences can explore the best online geology degree programs. These offerings provide critical insights into earth processes, complementing environmental science careers focused on conservation and natural resources management.

Best Scientists Citing Camille Li

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles