World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
67
Citations
14289
World Ranking
2005
National Ranking
133

Thomas Jung publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Jung sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 306 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Thomas Jung D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Jung sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas Jung is affiliated with the Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research in Germany. The primary focus of their research lies within Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science, covering a broad range of topics related to climate and environmental change.

Their work encompasses several prominent subfields including Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Oceanography, Geology, and Environmental Chemistry. These fields underline their engagement with complex environmental systems and processes.

The main topics of research associated with Thomas Jung include:

  • Climate variability and models
  • Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
  • Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Geological Studies and Exploration
  • Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena

Thomas Jung has contributed to multiple recent scientific papers, reflecting ongoing research efforts into climate and environmental dynamics. Notable publications comprise:

  • "Robust but weak winter atmospheric circulation response to future Arctic sea ice loss," 2022, Nature Communications
  • "Simulations for CMIP6 With the AWI Climate Model AWI-CM-1-1," 2020, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
  • "Intensification of the Atlantic Water Supply to the Arctic Ocean Through Fram Strait Induced by Arctic Sea Ice Decline," 2020, Geophysical Research Letters
  • "Delayed Antarctic sea-ice decline in high-resolution climate change simulations," 2022, Nature Communications
  • "Long-term evolution of ocean eddy activity in a warming world," 2022, Nature Climate Change

Their frequent collaborators include researchers such as Nikolay Koldunov, Sergey Danilov, Dmitry Sidorenko, Qiang Wang, and Tido Semmler. These collaborations have resulted in a significant number of joint publications, highlighting a strong network in climate and oceanographic modeling.

Thomas Jung publishes often in venues such as:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Geoscientific Model Development
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • Communications Earth & Environment
  • Nature Communications

Best Publications

  • Advances in simulating atmospheric variability with the ECMWF model: From synoptic to decadal time-scales

    Peter Bechtold;Martin Köhler;Thomas Jung;Francisco Doblas-Reyes

  • Divergent consensuses on Arctic amplification influence on midlatitude severe winter weather

    J. Cohen;X. Zhang;J. Francis;T. Jung;T. Jung

  • North Atlantic simulations in Coordinated Ocean-ice Reference Experiments phase II (CORE-II). Part I: Mean states

    Gokhan Danabasoglu;Steve G. Yeager;David Bailey;Erik Behrens

  • Stochastic parametrization and model uncertainty

    T. N. Palmer;R. Buizza;F. Doblas-Reyes;Thomas Jung

  • Representing model uncertainty in weather and climate prediction

    T. N. Palmer;G. J. Shutts;R. Hagedorn;F. Doblas-Reyes

  • Evidence for a recent change in the link between the North Atlantic Oscillation and Arctic Sea ice export

    Michael Hilmer;Thomas Jung

  • North Atlantic Interdecadal Variability: Oceanic response to the North Atlantic Oscillation (1865-1997)

    Carsten Eden;Thomas Jung

  • The Polar Amplification Model Intercomparison Project (PAMIP) contribution to CMIP6: investigating the causes and consequences of polar amplification

    Doug M. Smith;James A. Screen;Clara Deser;Judah Cohen

  • Advancing Polar Prediction Capabilities on Daily to Seasonal Time Scales

    Thomas Jung;Neil D. Gordon;Peter Bauer;David H. Bromwich

  • The Finite Element Sea Ice-Ocean Model (FESOM) v.1.4: formulation of an ocean general circulation model

    Qiang Wang;Sergey Danilov;Dmitry Sidorenko;Ralph Timmermann

  • High-Resolution Global Climate Simulations with the ECMWF Model in Project Athena: Experimental Design, Model Climate, and Seasonal Forecast Skill

    Thomas Jung;M. J. Miller;T. N. Palmer;P. Towers

  • Robust but weak winter atmospheric circulation response to future Arctic sea ice loss

    Unknown

  • Simulating the diurnal cycle of rainfall in global climate models: resolution versus parameterization

    Paul A. Dirmeyer;Benjamin A. Cash;James L. Kinter;Thomas Jung

  • Towards multi-resolution global climate modeling with ECHAM6–FESOM. Part I: model formulation and mean climate

    D Sidorenko;T Rackow;T Jung;T Semmler

  • Characteristics of the Recent Eastward Shift of Interannual NAO Variability

    Thomas Jung;Michael Hilmer;Eberhard Ruprecht;Sabine Kleppek

  • Tropical Cyclone Climatology in a 10-km Global Atmospheric GCM: Toward Weather-Resolving Climate Modeling

    Julia V. Manganello;Kevin I. Hodges;James L. Kinter;Benjamin A. Cash

  • North Atlantic simulations in Coordinated Ocean-ice Reference Experiments phase II (CORE-II). Part II: Inter-annual to decadal variability

    Gokhan Danabasoglu;Steve G. Yeager;Who M. Kim;Erik Behrens

  • Predictability of the Arctic sea ice edge

    Helge F. Goessling;Steffen Tietsche;Jonathan J. Day;Ed Hawkins

  • The Finite-volumE Sea ice–Ocean Model (FESOM2)

    Sergey Danilov;Dmitry Sidorenko;Qiang Wang;Thomas Jung

  • Simulations for CMIP6 with the AWI climate model AWI-CM-1-1

    Tido Semmler;Sergey Danilov;Sergey Danilov;Sergey Danilov;Paul Gierz;Helge F. Goessling

  • An assessment of Antarctic Circumpolar Current and Southern Ocean meridional overturning circulation during 1958–2007 in a suite of interannual CORE-II simulations

    Riccardo Farneti;Stephanie M. Downes;Stephen M. Griffies;Simon J. Marsland

  • Sensitivity of extratropical cyclone characteristics to horizontal resolution in the ECMWF model

    Thomas Jung;S. K. Gulev;I. Rudeva;V. Soloviov

  • NOTES AND CORRESPONDENCE Characteristics of the Recent Eastward Shift of Interannual NAO Variability

    Thomas Jung;M Ichael Hilmer;E Berhard Ruprecht;Sabine Kleppek

Frequent Co-Authors

Qiang Wang
Qiang Wang Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research
Richard J. Greatbatch
Richard J. Greatbatch GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel
Simona Masina
Simona Masina Centro Euro-Mediterraneo sui Cambiamenti Climatici
Tim Palmer
Tim Palmer University of Oxford
Martin Losch
Martin Losch Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research
Helge Drange
Helge Drange University of Bergen
Gokhan Danabasoglu
Gokhan Danabasoglu National Center for Atmospheric Research
Antonio Navarra
Antonio Navarra National Institute of Geophysics and Volcanology
Stephen M. Griffies
Stephen M. Griffies National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Benjamin Rabe
Benjamin Rabe Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to diverse online degrees and career paths. Many students consider options that align with their interests and career goals while balancing workload and flexibility. For those seeking a lighter academic commitment, the easiest bachelors degree programs offer a range of subjects that can complement environmental studies without overwhelming complexity.

Geoscience and Geology are closely related fields, and pursuing a geology online degree is an excellent option for students interested in studying the Earth’s physical properties and processes. This degree can lead to careers in environmental consulting, natural resource management, and disaster preparedness.

Another thriving area is Geographic Information Systems (GIS), which combines technology with environmental data analysis. Many top universities offer the best GIS schools programs online, enabling students to learn spatial data management skills critical in conservation, urban planning, and environmental monitoring.

For those aiming to enter public administration and policy-making in environmental sectors, completing a 1 year mpa online program provides advanced leadership training and governance knowledge. This pathway is ideal for professionals looking to impact environmental policies at local, state, or federal levels.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas Jung

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles