World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 67 2008 1916 133 131 306 14289

Thomas Jung publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Thomas Jung between 1997 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Thomas Jung published across 30 years, from 1997 to 2026, averaging 14.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 42 publications in 2016. 35 of the 423 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 42. Peak 42 publications in 2016. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 2 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 27 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 23 publications 2015: 23 publications 2016: 42 publications 2017: 31 publications 2018: 26 publications 2019: 25 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 27 publications 2023: 27 publications 2024: 30 publications 2025: 33 publications 2026: 2 publications
1997 2026

423 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Thomas Jung: publications per year, 1997 to 2026
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 2
1999 1
2000 2
2001 2
2002 4
2003 4
2004 2
2005 5
2006 6
2007 7
2008 6
2009 3
2010 6
2011 10
2012 27
2013 17
2014 23
2015 23
2016 42
2017 31
2018 26
2019 25
2020 13
2021 16
2022 27
2023 27
2024 30
2025 33
2026 2
Total 423
Download as CSV

Thomas Jung publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Jung sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 301–310 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 306 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130 306
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Thomas Jung D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Jung sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 67 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118 67
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Thomas Jung is affiliated with the Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research in Germany. The primary focus of their research lies within Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science, covering a broad range of topics related to climate and environmental change.

Their work encompasses several prominent subfields including Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Oceanography, Geology, and Environmental Chemistry. These fields underline their engagement with complex environmental systems and processes.

The main topics of research associated with Thomas Jung include:

  • Climate variability and models
  • Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
  • Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Geological Studies and Exploration
  • Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena

Thomas Jung has contributed to multiple recent scientific papers, reflecting ongoing research efforts into climate and environmental dynamics. Notable publications comprise:

  • "Robust but weak winter atmospheric circulation response to future Arctic sea ice loss," 2022, Nature Communications
  • "Simulations for CMIP6 With the AWI Climate Model AWI-CM-1-1," 2020, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
  • "Intensification of the Atlantic Water Supply to the Arctic Ocean Through Fram Strait Induced by Arctic Sea Ice Decline," 2020, Geophysical Research Letters
  • "Delayed Antarctic sea-ice decline in high-resolution climate change simulations," 2022, Nature Communications
  • "Long-term evolution of ocean eddy activity in a warming world," 2022, Nature Climate Change

Their frequent collaborators include researchers such as Nikolay Koldunov, Sergey Danilov, Dmitry Sidorenko, Qiang Wang, and Tido Semmler. These collaborations have resulted in a significant number of joint publications, highlighting a strong network in climate and oceanographic modeling.

Thomas Jung publishes often in venues such as:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Geoscientific Model Development
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • Communications Earth & Environment
  • Nature Communications

Best Publications

  • Advances in simulating atmospheric variability with the ECMWF model: From synoptic to decadal time-scales

    Peter Bechtold;Martin Köhler;Thomas Jung;Francisco Doblas-Reyes

  • Divergent consensuses on Arctic amplification influence on midlatitude severe winter weather

    J. Cohen;X. Zhang;J. Francis;T. Jung;T. Jung

  • North Atlantic simulations in Coordinated Ocean-ice Reference Experiments phase II (CORE-II). Part I: Mean states

    Gokhan Danabasoglu;Steve G. Yeager;David Bailey;Erik Behrens

  • Stochastic parametrization and model uncertainty

    T. N. Palmer;R. Buizza;F. Doblas-Reyes;Thomas Jung

  • Representing model uncertainty in weather and climate prediction

    T. N. Palmer;G. J. Shutts;R. Hagedorn;F. Doblas-Reyes

  • Evidence for a recent change in the link between the North Atlantic Oscillation and Arctic Sea ice export

    Michael Hilmer;Thomas Jung

  • North Atlantic Interdecadal Variability: Oceanic response to the North Atlantic Oscillation (1865-1997)

    Carsten Eden;Thomas Jung

  • The Polar Amplification Model Intercomparison Project (PAMIP) contribution to CMIP6: investigating the causes and consequences of polar amplification

    Doug M. Smith;James A. Screen;Clara Deser;Judah Cohen

  • Advancing Polar Prediction Capabilities on Daily to Seasonal Time Scales

    Thomas Jung;Neil D. Gordon;Peter Bauer;David H. Bromwich

  • The Finite Element Sea Ice-Ocean Model (FESOM) v.1.4: formulation of an ocean general circulation model

    Qiang Wang;Sergey Danilov;Dmitry Sidorenko;Ralph Timmermann

  • High-Resolution Global Climate Simulations with the ECMWF Model in Project Athena: Experimental Design, Model Climate, and Seasonal Forecast Skill

    Thomas Jung;M. J. Miller;T. N. Palmer;P. Towers

  • Robust but weak winter atmospheric circulation response to future Arctic sea ice loss

    Unknown

  • Simulating the diurnal cycle of rainfall in global climate models: resolution versus parameterization

    Paul A. Dirmeyer;Benjamin A. Cash;James L. Kinter;Thomas Jung

  • Towards multi-resolution global climate modeling with ECHAM6–FESOM. Part I: model formulation and mean climate

    D Sidorenko;T Rackow;T Jung;T Semmler

  • Characteristics of the Recent Eastward Shift of Interannual NAO Variability

    Thomas Jung;Michael Hilmer;Eberhard Ruprecht;Sabine Kleppek

  • Tropical Cyclone Climatology in a 10-km Global Atmospheric GCM: Toward Weather-Resolving Climate Modeling

    Julia V. Manganello;Kevin I. Hodges;James L. Kinter;Benjamin A. Cash

  • North Atlantic simulations in Coordinated Ocean-ice Reference Experiments phase II (CORE-II). Part II: Inter-annual to decadal variability

    Gokhan Danabasoglu;Steve G. Yeager;Who M. Kim;Erik Behrens

  • Predictability of the Arctic sea ice edge

    Helge F. Goessling;Steffen Tietsche;Jonathan J. Day;Ed Hawkins

  • The Finite-volumE Sea ice–Ocean Model (FESOM2)

    Sergey Danilov;Dmitry Sidorenko;Qiang Wang;Thomas Jung

  • Simulations for CMIP6 with the AWI climate model AWI-CM-1-1

    Tido Semmler;Sergey Danilov;Sergey Danilov;Sergey Danilov;Paul Gierz;Helge F. Goessling

  • An assessment of Antarctic Circumpolar Current and Southern Ocean meridional overturning circulation during 1958–2007 in a suite of interannual CORE-II simulations

    Riccardo Farneti;Stephanie M. Downes;Stephen M. Griffies;Simon J. Marsland

  • Sensitivity of extratropical cyclone characteristics to horizontal resolution in the ECMWF model

    Thomas Jung;S. K. Gulev;I. Rudeva;V. Soloviov

  • NOTES AND CORRESPONDENCE Characteristics of the Recent Eastward Shift of Interannual NAO Variability

    Thomas Jung;M Ichael Hilmer;E Berhard Ruprecht;Sabine Kleppek

Frequent Co-Authors

Qiang Wang
Qiang Wang Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research
Richard J. Greatbatch
Richard J. Greatbatch GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel
Simona Masina
Simona Masina Centro Euro-Mediterraneo sui Cambiamenti Climatici
Tim Palmer
Tim Palmer University of Oxford
Martin Losch
Martin Losch Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research
Helge Drange
Helge Drange University of Bergen
Gokhan Danabasoglu
Gokhan Danabasoglu National Center for Atmospheric Research
Antonio Navarra
Antonio Navarra National Institute of Geophysics and Volcanology
Stephen M. Griffies
Stephen M. Griffies National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Benjamin Rabe
Benjamin Rabe Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to diverse online degrees and career paths. Many students consider options that align with their interests and career goals while balancing workload and flexibility. For those seeking a lighter academic commitment, the easiest bachelors degree programs offer a range of subjects that can complement environmental studies without overwhelming complexity.

Geoscience and Geology are closely related fields, and pursuing a geology online degree is an excellent option for students interested in studying the Earth’s physical properties and processes. This degree can lead to careers in environmental consulting, natural resource management, and disaster preparedness.

Another thriving area is Geographic Information Systems (GIS), which combines technology with environmental data analysis. Many top universities offer the best GIS schools programs online, enabling students to learn spatial data management skills critical in conservation, urban planning, and environmental monitoring.

For those aiming to enter public administration and policy-making in environmental sectors, completing a 1 year mpa online program provides advanced leadership training and governance knowledge. This pathway is ideal for professionals looking to impact environmental policies at local, state, or federal levels.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas Jung

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles