World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
57
Citations
10389
World Ranking
3506
National Ranking
241

Qiang Wang publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Qiang Wang sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 316 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Qiang Wang D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Qiang Wang sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Qiang Wang is affiliated with the Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science, with significant contributions in subfields such as Atmospheric Science, Oceanography, Global and Planetary Change, Environmental Chemistry, and Geology.

The scientist's work addresses several main research topics, including:

  • Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
  • Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Climate variability and models
  • Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
  • Climate change and permafrost
  • Cryospheric studies and observations
  • Geology and Paleoclimatology Research

Qiang Wang has contributed to numerous papers, notable among them are:

  • Evaluation of global ocean-sea-ice model simulations based on the experimental protocols of the Ocean Model Intercomparison Project phase 2 (OMIP-2), 2020, Geoscientific model development
  • Assessment of Sea Ice Extent in CMIP6 With Comparison to Observations and CMIP5, 2020, Geophysical Research Letters
  • Simulations for CMIP6 With the AWI Climate Model AWI-CM-1-1, 2020, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
  • Impact of horizontal resolution on global ocean-sea ice model simulations based on the experimental protocols of the Ocean Model Intercomparison Project phase 2 (OMIP-2), 2020, Geoscientific model development
  • Arctic Ocean Amplification in a warming climate in CMIP6 models, 2022, Science Advances

They have collaborated frequently with other researchers, including Sergey Danilov, Dmitry Sidorenko, Nikolay Koldunov, Thomas Jung, and Qi Shu.

Qiang Wang's research has frequently appeared in various publication venues, with a significant number of works published in:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Geoscientific model development
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
  • Geophysical Research Letters

Best Publications

  • North Atlantic simulations in Coordinated Ocean-ice Reference Experiments phase II (CORE-II). Part I: Mean states

    Gokhan Danabasoglu;Steve G. Yeager;David Bailey;Erik Behrens

  • OMIP contribution to CMIP6: experimental and diagnostic protocol for the physical component of the Ocean Model Intercomparison Project

    Stephen M. Griffies;Gokhan Danabasoglu;Paul J. Durack;Alistair J. Adcroft

  • The Finite Element Sea Ice-Ocean Model (FESOM) v.1.4: formulation of an ocean general circulation model

    Qiang Wang;Sergey Danilov;Dmitry Sidorenko;Ralph Timmermann

  • Towards multi-resolution global climate modeling with ECHAM6–FESOM. Part I: model formulation and mean climate

    D Sidorenko;T Rackow;T Jung;T Semmler

  • Evaluation of global ocean–sea-ice model simulations based on the experimental protocols of the Ocean Model Intercomparison Project phase 2 (OMIP-2)

    Hiroyuki Tsujino;L. Shogo Urakawa;Stephen M. Griffies;Stephen M. Griffies;Gokhan Danabasoglu

  • Assessment of sea ice extent in CMIP6 with comparison to observations and CMIP5

    Qi Shu;Qiang Wang;Zhenya Song;Fangli Qiao

  • North Atlantic simulations in Coordinated Ocean-ice Reference Experiments phase II (CORE-II). Part II: Inter-annual to decadal variability

    Gokhan Danabasoglu;Steve G. Yeager;Who M. Kim;Erik Behrens

  • The Finite-volumE Sea ice–Ocean Model (FESOM2)

    Sergey Danilov;Dmitry Sidorenko;Qiang Wang;Thomas Jung

  • Simulations for CMIP6 with the AWI climate model AWI-CM-1-1

    Tido Semmler;Sergey Danilov;Sergey Danilov;Sergey Danilov;Paul Gierz;Helge F. Goessling

  • An assessment of Antarctic Circumpolar Current and Southern Ocean meridional overturning circulation during 1958–2007 in a suite of interannual CORE-II simulations

    Riccardo Farneti;Stephanie M. Downes;Stephen M. Griffies;Simon J. Marsland

  • Ice-shelf basal melting in a global finite-element sea-ice/ice-shelf/ocean model

    Ralph Timmermann;Qiang Wang;Hartmut Hellmer

  • Finite-Element Sea Ice Model (FESIM), version 2

    Sergey Danilov;Qiang Wang;Ralph Timmermann;Nikolay Iakovlev

  • An extension of conditional nonlinear optimal perturbation approach and its applications

    M. Mu;W. Duan;Q. Wang;R. Zhang

  • Impact of horizontal resolution on global ocean–sea ice model simulations based on the experimental protocols of the Ocean Model Intercomparison Project phase 2 (OMIP-2)

    Eric P. Chassignet;Stephen G. Yeager;Baylor Fox-Kemper;Alexandra Bozec

  • An assessment of the Arctic Ocean in a suite of interannual CORE-II simulations. Part III: Hydrography and fluxes

    Mehmet Ilıcak;Helge Drange;Helge Drange;Qiang Wang;Rüdiger Gerdes

  • An assessment of global and regional sea level for years 1993-2007 in a suite of interannual CORE-II simulations

    Stephen M. Griffies;Jianjun Yin;Paul J. Durack;Paul Goddard

  • Precipitation of southwestern Canada: Wavelet, scaling, multifractal analysis, and teleconnection to climate anomalies

    Thian Yew Gan;Adam Kenea Gobena;Qiang Wang

  • Seasonal variations of the Yellow River plume in the Bohai Sea: A model study

    Qiang Wang;Xinyu Guo;Hidetaka Takeoka

  • Finite element ocean circulation model based on triangular prismatic elements, with application in studying the effect of topography representation

    Qiang Wang;Sergey Danilov;Jens Schröter

  • Sea ice leads in the Arctic Ocean: Model assessment, interannual variability and trends

    Q. Wang;S. Danilov;T. Jung;T. Jung;Lars Kaleschke

  • Intensification of the Atlantic Water Supply to the Arctic Ocean Through Fram Strait Induced by Arctic Sea Ice Decline

    Qiang Wang;Claudia Wekerle;Xuezhu Wang;Sergey Danilov;Sergey Danilov;Sergey Danilov

  • An assessment of the Arctic Ocean in a suite of interannual CORE-II simulations. Part I: Sea ice and solid freshwater

    Qiang Wang;Mehmet Ilicak;Rüdiger Gerdes;Helge Drange

Frequent Co-Authors

Sergey Danilov
Sergey Danilov Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research
Thomas Jung
Thomas Jung Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research
Jens Schröter
Jens Schröter Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research
Simona Masina
Simona Masina Centro Euro-Mediterraneo sui Cambiamenti Climatici
Gokhan Danabasoglu
Gokhan Danabasoglu National Center for Atmospheric Research
Eric P. Chassignet
Eric P. Chassignet Florida State University
Stephen M. Griffies
Stephen M. Griffies National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Hiroyuki Tsujino
Hiroyuki Tsujino Japan Meteorological Agency
Arne Biastoch
Arne Biastoch GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel
Helge Drange
Helge Drange University of Bergen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to diverse career paths that often require interdisciplinary knowledge. For those interested in Earth's physical environment, pursuing a geology degree online can provide a strong foundation in natural processes, resource management, and environmental assessment.

Alternatively, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) skills are increasingly in demand to analyze spatial data critical for environmental planning and conservation. Exploring the best gis programs in the us can help students acquire expertise in mapping technologies important for climate studies and land use management.

For those looking to influence environmental policy and administration, a Master of Public Administration can be invaluable. Accelerated options like the mpa one year programs offer focused training in leadership, governance, and sustainable development initiatives.

Environmental challenges also have social dimensions; thus, knowledge in human behavior and societal impacts is crucial. Pursuing the best online bachelor degree in sociology helps in understanding community dynamics and fostering environmental justice.

Best Scientists Citing Qiang Wang

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles