World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
41
Citations
6006
World Ranking
7775
National Ranking
489

Jens Schröter publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jens Schröter sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 404 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Jens Schröter D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jens Schröter sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jens Schröter is affiliated with the Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research in Germany. Their research primarily spans the Arts and Humanities, with a particular focus on Religious Studies, Sociology and Political Science, and Archeology. They also contribute to studies in Oceanography and Literature and Literary Theory.

Their main topics of work encompass Biblical Studies and Interpretation, Archaeology and Historical Studies, Historical and Linguistic Studies, Theology and Canon Law Studies, Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies, Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes, and Musicology and Musical Analysis.

Schröter has published in various venues, including:

  • Encyclopedia of the Bible Online
  • Early Christianity
  • Zfk - Zeitschrift für Kulturwissenschaften
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans
  • Digital Culture & Society

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Schröter include:

  • "Ocean Bottom Pressure Variability: Can It Be Reliably Modeled?" (2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans)
  • "Die Zukunft vorstellen - Technologie-Demonstrationen in der Geschichte digitaler Medien - Imagining the Future - Technology Demonstrations in the History of Digital Media" (2021, Technikgeschichte)
  • "The Digital, Capitalist Gaze" (2021, Digital Culture & Society)
  • "Friedrich A. Kittler: Die Eskalation der Medien" (2024, Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft)
  • "Computerspiele und ökonomische Modellformen Auf dem Weg zu transformationskritischen Medien" (2021, Zeitschrift für Medienwissenschaft)

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Nils Holger Petersen
  • Konrad Schmid
  • Peter Gemeinhardt
  • Thomas Römer
  • Richard Menkis

Schröter has contributed to several book publications, with notable publishers and titles such as:

  • Mohr Siebeck eBooks: "From Jesus to the New Testament" (2025), "Gleichnisse und Parabeln in der frühchristlichen Literatur" (2021), and "Paulusmemoria und Paulusexegese" (2023)
  • Harvard University Press: "The Making of the Bible" (2021, two publications)
  • University of Zurich: "The making of the Bible: from the first fragments to sacred scripture" (2021)

Best Publications

  • The Finite Element Sea Ice-Ocean Model (FESOM) v.1.4: formulation of an ocean general circulation model

    Qiang Wang;Sergey Danilov;Dmitry Sidorenko;Ralph Timmermann

  • Revisiting the contemporary sea-level budget on global and regional scales

    Roelof Rietbroek;Sandra-Esther Brunnabend;Sandra-Esther Brunnabend;Jürgen Kusche;Jens Schröter

  • Testing a marine ecosystem model: Sensitivity analysis and parameter optimization

    Katja Fennel;Martin Losch;Jens Schröter;Manfred Wenzel

  • A finite-element ocean model: principles and evaluation

    Sergey Danilov;Gennady Kivman;Jens Schröter

  • Towards multi-resolution global climate modeling with ECHAM6–FESOM. Part I: model formulation and mean climate

    D Sidorenko;T Rackow;T Jung;T Semmler

  • Ocean circulation and sea ice distribution in a finite element global sea ice–ocean model

    Ralph Timmermann;Sergey Danilov;Jens Schröter;Carmen Böning

  • Hydrographic Atlas of the Southern Ocean

    Dirk Olbers;V. Gouretsky;G. Seiß;Jens Schröter

  • A Unification of Ensemble Square Root Kalman Filters

    Lars Nerger;Tijana Janjić;Jens Schröter;Wolfgang Hiller

  • Finite-Element Sea Ice Model (FESIM), version 2

    Sergey Danilov;Qiang Wang;Ralph Timmermann;Nikolay Iakovlev

  • Modelling carbon overconsumption and the formation of extracellular particulate organic carbon

    Markus Schartau;Anja Engel;Jens Schröter;Silke Thoms

  • An assessment of global and regional sea level for years 1993-2007 in a suite of interannual CORE-II simulations

    Stephen M. Griffies;Jianjun Yin;Paul J. Durack;Paul Goddard

  • A comparison of error subspace Kalman filters

    Lars Nerger;Wolfgang Hiller;Jens Schröter

  • Reconstruction of regional mean sea level anomalies from tide gauges using neural networks

    Manfred Wenzel;Jens Schröter

  • On Domain Localization in Ensemble-Based Kalman Filter Algorithms

    Tijana Janjić;Lars Nerger;Alberta Albertella;Jens Schröter

  • Finite element ocean circulation model based on triangular prismatic elements, with application in studying the effect of topography representation

    Qiang Wang;Sergey Danilov;Jens Schröter

  • PDAF - The Parallel Data Assimilation Framework: Experiences with Kalman Filtering

    Lars Nerger;Wolfgang Hiller;Jens Schröter

  • Ozone depletion during the solar proton events of October//November 2003 as seen by SCIAMACHY

    Guenter Rohen;C. von Savigny;M. Sinnhuber;E. J. Llewellyn

  • On the Sensitivity of Field Reconstruction and Prediction Using Empirical Orthogonal Functions Derived from Gappy Data

    Marc H. Taylor;Martin Losch;Manfred Wenzel;Jens Schröter

  • Tsunami early warning using GPS‐Shield arrays

    Stephan V. Sobolev;Andrey Y. Babeyko;Rongjiang Wang;Andreas Hoechner

  • Data Assimilation for marine monitoring and prediction : The MERCATOR operational assimilation systems and the MERSEA developments

    Pierre Brasseur;P. Bahurel;L. Bertino;F. Birol

Frequent Co-Authors

Sergey Danilov
Sergey Danilov Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research
Qiang Wang
Qiang Wang Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research
Ralph Timmermann
Ralph Timmermann Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research
Thomas Jung
Thomas Jung Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research
Martin Losch
Martin Losch Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research
Reiner Rummel
Reiner Rummel Technical University of Munich
Jürgen Kusche
Jürgen Kusche University of Bonn
Bernadette M. Sloyan
Bernadette M. Sloyan CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research
Hartmut Hellmer
Hartmut Hellmer Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research
Dieter Wolf-Gladrow
Dieter Wolf-Gladrow Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to diverse career options that blend environmental knowledge with leadership, policy, and social sciences. For professionals aiming to advance in public administration roles within environmental agencies, exploring online MPA degrees can provide specialized training in management and policy development.

Understanding societal impacts on the environment is crucial, which highlights the value of an accredited online bachelors in sociology. This degree offers insights into human behavior and social systems, equipping graduates to design effective, community-focused environmental solutions.

For those interested in academia or high-level research, pursuing advanced education is key. Several programs offer a doctorate degree online no dissertation, enabling professionals to earn their degree while managing busy schedules and career demands. These options emphasize flexible learning without the traditional dissertation hurdle.

If you’re considering a specialization in education related to environmental topics, researching accredited EdS to EdD programs can help build expertise in curriculum leadership and environmental education strategies. Such pathways equip graduates to influence both policy and practice in educational settings.

Best Scientists Citing Jens Schröter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles