World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Martin Losch publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Losch sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Martin Losch D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Losch sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Martin Losch is affiliated with the Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on topics related to cryospheric sciences, with a strong emphasis on the dynamics of Arctic and Antarctic ice, climate change impacts, and environmental processes associated with polar regions.

Their main fields of study include Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science, with subfields such as Atmospheric Science, Environmental Chemistry, Oceanography, Global and Planetary Change, and Computational Mechanics contributing to their multidisciplinary approach.

Key topics covered in their research encompass:

  • Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
  • Cryospheric studies and observations
  • Climate change and permafrost
  • Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
  • Climate variability and models
  • Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics

Martin Losch's recent publications illustrate the scope and direction of their work. Notable papers include:

  • Atmospheric and Surface Processes, and Feedback Mechanisms Determining Arctic Amplification: A Review of First Results and Prospects of the (AC)3 Project, 2022, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • Sea Ice Rheology Experiment (SIREx): 1. Scaling and Statistical Properties of Sea-Ice Deformation Fields, 2022, Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans
  • Sea Ice Rheology Experiment (SIREx): 2. Evaluating Linear Kinematic Features in High-Resolution Sea Ice Simulations, 2022, Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans
  • The Future of Sea Ice Modeling: Where Do We Go from Here?, 2020, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • Toward a Data Assimilation System for Seamless Sea Ice Prediction Based on the AWI Climate Model, 2020, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems

The scientist frequently publishes in several venues with consistent contributions to:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • The Cryosphere

Collaboration is an important aspect of Martin Losch's work, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Nils Hutter
  • Bruno Tremblay
  • Jean-François Lemieux
  • Qiang Wang
  • Einar Ólason

Best Publications

  • On the formulation of sea-ice models. Part 1: Effects of different solver implementations and parameterizations

    Martin Losch;Dimitris Menemenlis;Jean-Michel Campin;Patick Heimbach

  • Deep carbon export from a Southern Ocean iron-fertilized diatom bloom

    Victor Smetacek;Victor Smetacek;Christine Klaas;Volker H. Strass;Philipp Assmy;Philipp Assmy

  • Advancing Polar Prediction Capabilities on Daily to Seasonal Time Scales

    Thomas Jung;Neil D. Gordon;Peter Bauer;David H. Bromwich

  • Modeling ice shelf cavities in a z coordinate ocean general circulation model

    Martin Losch

  • Testing a marine ecosystem model: Sensitivity analysis and parameter optimization

    Katja Fennel;Martin Losch;Jens Schröter;Manfred Wenzel

  • Seasonally different carbon flux changes in the Southern Ocean in response to the southern annular mode

    Judith Hauck;Christoph Völker;Tingting Wang;Mario Hoppema

  • Modeled Trends in Antarctic Sea Ice Thickness

    Paul R. Holland;Nicolas P.R. Bruneau;Clare Enright;Martin Losch

  • Sea Ice Rheology Experiment (SIREx), Part I: Scaling and statistical properties of sea‐ice deformation fields

    Unknown

  • On the drivers of phytoplankton blooms in the Antarctic marginal ice zone: A modeling approach

    Marc Hollis Taylor;Martin Losch;Astrid Bracher;Astrid Bracher

  • Assimilating SMOS sea ice thickness into a coupled ice-ocean model using a local SEIK filter

    Qinghua Yang;Svetlana N. Losa;Martin Losch;Xiangshan Tian-Kunze

  • Sea Ice Rheology Experiment (SIREx), Part II: Evaluating linear kinematic features in high‐resolution sea‐ice simulations

    Unknown

  • Evaluation of FESOM2.0 Coupled to ECHAM6.3: Preindustrial and HighResMIP Simulations

    Dmitry Sidorenko;Helge F. Goessling;Nikolay Koldunov;Nikolay Koldunov;Patrick Scholz

  • On the formulation of sea-ice models. Part 2: Lessons from multi-year adjoint sea ice export sensitivities through the Canadian Arctic Archipelago.

    Patick Heimbach;Dimitris Menemenlis;Martin Losch;Jean-Michel Campin

  • The adaptive EVP method for solving the sea ice momentum equation

    Madlen Kimmritz;Sergey Danilov;Martin Losch

  • Arctic-Wide Sea Ice Thickness Estimates From Combining Satellite Remote Sensing Data and a Dynamic Ice-Ocean Model with Data Assimilation During the CryoSat-2 Period

    Longjiang Mu;Longjiang Mu;Martin Losch;Qinghua Yang;Robert Ricker

  • Dynamics of a Snowball Earth ocean

    Yosef Ashkenazy;Hezi Gildor;Martin Losch;Francis Alexander Macdonald

  • Space-borne gravimetric satellite constellations and ocean tides: aliasing effects

    Peter M. Visser;N. Sneeuw;T. Reubelt;Martin Losch

  • How Sensitive are Coarse General Circulation Models to Fundamental Approximations in the Equations of Motion

    Martin Losch;Alistair Adcroft;Jean-Michel Campin

  • Improving sea ice thickness estimates by assimilating CryoSat-2 and SMOS sea ice thickness data simultaneously

    Longjiang Mu;Qinghua Yang;Martin Losch;Svetlana N. Losa;Svetlana N. Losa

  • Scaling Properties of Arctic Sea Ice Deformation in a High-Resolution Viscous-Plastic Sea Ice Model and in Satellite Observations.

    Nils Hutter;Martin Losch;Dimitris Menemenlis

  • Freshwater in the ocean is not a useful parameter in climate research

    Ursula Schauer;Martin Losch

  • Adjoint sensitivities of sub-ice-shelf melt rates to ocean circulation under the Pine Island Ice Shelf, West Antarctica

    Patrick Heimbach;Martin Losch

  • Dynamical reconstruction of the global ocean state during the Last Glacial Maximum

    Takasumi Kurahashi-Nakamura;André Paul;Martin Losch;Martin Losch

  • Mixed layer analysis of a mesoscale eddy in the Antarctic Polar Front Zone

    Boris Cisewski;Boris Cisewski;Volker H. Strass;Martin Losch;Hartmut Prandke

  • Simulation of subice shelf melt rates in a general circulation model: Velocity‐dependent transfer and the role of friction

    Véronique Dansereau;Patrick Heimbach;Martin Losch

Frequent Co-Authors

Sergey Danilov
Sergey Danilov Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research
Thomas Jung
Thomas Jung Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research
Jens Schröter
Jens Schröter Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research
André Paul
André Paul University of Bremen
Astrid Bracher
Astrid Bracher University of Bremen
Christoph Völker
Christoph Völker Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research
Dieter Wolf-Gladrow
Dieter Wolf-Gladrow Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research
Nico Sneeuw
Nico Sneeuw University of Stuttgart
Qiang Wang
Qiang Wang Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degree options can expand your career opportunities in Earth Science and related fields. Many programs today cater to diverse learner needs, including veterans and seniors seeking flexible paths to enhance their skills. For those interested in language proficiency alongside their scientific expertise, a veteran friendly online Spanish degree offers an accessible route to broaden communication abilities in global environmental contexts.

Creative professionals looking to combine artistic and scientific insights might consider an online MFA visual arts program. These degrees support careers that integrate art with environmental themes or data visualization, enhancing public engagement with Earth Science topics.

For those interested in management roles within environmental organizations or research institutions, a masters degree in human resource management online provides essential leadership and organizational skills to support sustainable initiatives.

Additionally, lifelong learners and older adults can benefit from reviewing the best college degrees for seniors, which offer flexible scheduling and relevant coursework to accommodate their unique learning pace and career goals within Earth Science and related disciplines.

Best Scientists Citing Martin Losch

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles