World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Earth Science 35 7709 7141 779 722 181 4049

Pierre Mathiot publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Pierre Mathiot between 2006 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Pierre Mathiot published across 21 years, from 2006 to 2026, averaging 10 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2024. 24 of the 209 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2024. 2006: 1 publication 2007: 1 publication 2008: 1 publication 2009: 3 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 22 publications 2023: 26 publications 2024: 27 publications 2025: 22 publications 2026: 2 publications
2006 2026

209 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Pierre Mathiot: publications per year, 2006 to 2026
Year Publications
2006 1
2007 1
2008 1
2009 3
2010 7
2011 12
2012 13
2013 13
2014 5
2015 8
2016 5
2017 5
2018 6
2019 10
2020 5
2021 15
2022 22
2023 26
2024 27
2025 22
2026 2
Total 209
Download as CSV

Pierre Mathiot publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pierre Mathiot sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 603+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 557. Most scientists, 557, have 128–137 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 178–187 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 603+

This scientist: 181 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 5
48–57 33
58–67 94
68–77 161
78–87 278
88–97 376
98–107 404
108–117 484
118–127 540
128–137 557
138–147 491
148–157 495
158–167 458
168–177 490
178–187 414 181
188–197 401
198–207 333
208–217 292
218–227 290
228–237 262
238–247 243
248–257 208
258–267 185
268–277 147
278–287 128
288–297 119
298–307 120
308–317 107
318–327 93
328–337 87
338–347 64
348–357 87
358–367 60
368–377 60
378–387 34
388–397 50
398–407 44
408–417 31
418–427 39
428–437 27
438–447 36
448–457 27
458–467 29
468–477 30
478–487 19
488–497 15
498–507 18
508–517 19
518–527 16
528–537 10
538–547 11
548–557 14
558–567 11
568–577 7
578–587 14
588–597 5
598–602 4
603+ 100
Download as CSV

Pierre Mathiot D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pierre Mathiot sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 77 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 106+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 389. Most scientists, 389, have 36 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 144
31 215
32 278
33 379
34 366
35 372 35
36 389
37 366
38 344
39 349
40 296
41 289
42 277
43 279
44 248
45 257
46 212
47 202
48 207
49 204
50 183
51 178
52 182
53 178
54 163
55 117
56 163
57 120
58 113
59 136
60 135
61 96
62 103
63 83
64 103
65 83
66 89
67 92
68 89
69 78
70 75
71 53
72 62
73 54
74 35
75 52
76 50
77 32
78 37
79 20
80 33
81 36
82 34
83 34
84 24
85 19
86 18
87 26
88 30
89 17
90 21
91 19
92 15
93 14
94 20
95 9
96 10
97 15
98 13
99 3
100 13
101 3
102 9
103 4
104 6
105 6
106+ 98
Download as CSV

Best Publications

  • Description of the resolution hierarchy of the global coupled HadGEM3-GC3.1 model as used in CMIP6 HighResMIP experiments

    Malcolm J. Roberts;Alex Baker;Ed W. Blockley;Daley Calvert

  • Experimental design for three interrelated marine ice sheet and ocean model intercomparison projects: MISMIP v. 3 (MISMIP +), ISOMIP v. 2 (ISOMIP +) and MISOMIP v. 1 (MISOMIP1)

    Xylar S. Asay-Davis;Stephen L. Cornford;Gaël Durand;Gaël Durand;Benjamin K. Galton-Fenzi;Benjamin K. Galton-Fenzi

  • Antarctic icebergs melt over the Southern Ocean: Climatology and impact on sea ice

    Nacho Merino;Nacho Merino;Julien Le Sommer;Julien Le Sommer;Gael Durand;Gael Durand;Nicolas C. Jourdain;Nicolas C. Jourdain

  • UK Global Ocean GO6 and GO7: a traceable hierarchy of model resolutions

    David Storkey;Adam T. Blaker;Pierre Mathiot;Pierre Mathiot;Alex Megann

  • Mesoscale Eddies in the Labrador Sea and Their Contribution to Convection and Restratification

    Jérôme Chanut;Bernard Barnier;William Large;Laurent Debreu

  • Resolving and parameterising the ocean mesoscale in earth system models

    Helene T. Hewitt;Malcolm Roberts;Pierre Mathiot;Arne Biastoch

  • Multiple causes of the Younger Dryas cold period

    Hans Renssen;Aurélien Mairesse;Hugues Goosse;Pierre Mathiot

  • Assessment of sub-shelf melting parameterisations using the ocean–ice-sheet coupled model NEMO(v3.6)–Elmer/Ice(v8.3)

    Lionel Favier;Nicolas C. Jourdain;Adrian Jenkins;Nacho Merino

  • Ocean circulation and sea-ice thinning induced by melting ice shelves in the Amundsen Sea

    Nicolas C. Jourdain;Pierre Mathiot;Nacho Merino;Gaël Durand

  • Explicit representation and parametrised impacts of under ice shelf seas in the z∗ coordinate ocean model NEMO 3.6

    Pierre Mathiot;Pierre Mathiot;Adrian Jenkins;Christopher Harris;Gurvan Madec

  • A model reconstruction of the Antarctic sea ice thickness and volume changes over 1980–2008 using data assimilation

    François Massonnet;Pierre Mathiot;Thierry Fichefet;Hugues Goosse

  • Coupling the U.K. Earth System Model to dynamic models of the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets

    Robin S. Smith;Pierre Mathiot;Pierre Mathiot;Antony Siahaan;Victoria Lee

  • The Antarctic contribution to 21st-century sea-level rise predicted by the UK Earth System Model with an interactive ice sheet

    Unknown

  • On the influence of model physics on simulations of Arctic and Antarctic sea ice

    François Massonnet;Thierry Fichefet;Hugues Goosse;Martin Vancoppenolle

  • Standing and Transient Eddies in the Response of the Southern Ocean Meridional Overturning to the Southern Annular Mode

    C. O. Dufour;J. Le Sommer;J. D. Zika;M. Gehlen

  • Model sensitivity of the Weddell and Ross seas, Antarctica, to vertical mixing and freshwater forcing

    Joakim Kjellsson;Paul R. Holland;Gareth J. Marshall;Pierre Mathiot

  • Remote Control of Filchner‐Ronne Ice Shelf Melt Rates by the Antarctic Slope Current

    Christopher Y. S. Bull;Adrian Jenkins;Nicolas C. Jourdain;Irena Vaňková

  • Simulating or prescribing the influence of tides on the Amundsen Sea ice shelves

    Nicolas C. Jourdain;Jean-Marc Molines;Julien Le Sommer;Pierre Mathiot

  • Modelling the seasonal variability of the Antarctic Slope Current

    Pierre Mathiot;Hugues Goosse;Thierry Fichefet;B. Barnier

  • On the formulation of snow thermal conductivity in large-scale sea ice models

    Olivier Lecomte;Thierry Fichefet;Martin Vancoppenolle;F. Dominé

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science in the USA can open doors to interdisciplinary career paths, many of which benefit from complementary online degrees. For those interested in information management or research, pursuing ala accredited mls programs offers a strong foundation in library science combined with digital resources management.

Wondering is library science a good degree? It certainly is, especially for graduates who want to support scientific research by organizing and curating vital Earth Science literature and data effectively.

In addition, creative fields such as digital imaging link closely with environmental documentation and analysis. Students can enhance their skills through an affordable option by exploring digital photography degree online, which is becoming increasingly relevant for documenting natural phenomena.

Veterans interested in this creative niche also have tailored opportunities. Many institutions offer veteran friendly online photography degree programs, helping them transition into careers that combine artistic skill with scientific observation.

Recently Published Articles