World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Earth Science 37 6858 6352 493 472 106 5206

Tore Hattermann publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Tore Hattermann between 2010 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Tore Hattermann published across 16 years, from 2010 to 2025, averaging 10 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 2020. 38 of the 160 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2010 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 2020. 2010: 1 publication 2011: 2 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 26 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 20 publications 2024: 20 publications 2025: 18 publications
2010 2025

160 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Tore Hattermann: publications per year, 2010 to 2025
Year Publications
2010 1
2011 2
2012 2
2013 0
2014 4
2015 3
2016 8
2017 13
2018 13
2019 11
2020 26
2021 9
2022 10
2023 20
2024 20
2025 18
Total 160
Download as CSV

Tore Hattermann publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tore Hattermann sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 603+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 557. Most scientists, 557, have 128–137 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 98–107 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 603+

This scientist: 106 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 5
48–57 33
58–67 94
68–77 161
78–87 278
88–97 376
98–107 404 106
108–117 484
118–127 540
128–137 557
138–147 491
148–157 495
158–167 458
168–177 490
178–187 414
188–197 401
198–207 333
208–217 292
218–227 290
228–237 262
238–247 243
248–257 208
258–267 185
268–277 147
278–287 128
288–297 119
298–307 120
308–317 107
318–327 93
328–337 87
338–347 64
348–357 87
358–367 60
368–377 60
378–387 34
388–397 50
398–407 44
408–417 31
418–427 39
428–437 27
438–447 36
448–457 27
458–467 29
468–477 30
478–487 19
488–497 15
498–507 18
508–517 19
518–527 16
528–537 10
538–547 11
548–557 14
558–567 11
568–577 7
578–587 14
588–597 5
598–602 4
603+ 100
Download as CSV

Tore Hattermann D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tore Hattermann sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 77 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 106+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 389. Most scientists, 389, have 36 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 144
31 215
32 278
33 379
34 366
35 372
36 389
37 366 37
38 344
39 349
40 296
41 289
42 277
43 279
44 248
45 257
46 212
47 202
48 207
49 204
50 183
51 178
52 182
53 178
54 163
55 117
56 163
57 120
58 113
59 136
60 135
61 96
62 103
63 83
64 103
65 83
66 89
67 92
68 89
69 78
70 75
71 53
72 62
73 54
74 35
75 52
76 50
77 32
78 37
79 20
80 33
81 36
82 34
83 34
84 24
85 19
86 18
87 26
88 30
89 17
90 21
91 19
92 15
93 14
94 20
95 9
96 10
97 15
98 13
99 3
100 13
101 3
102 9
103 4
104 6
105 6
106+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Tore Hattermann is affiliated with the Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on Earth and Planetary Sciences, with significant contributions to Environmental Science. Within these fields, their work covers several subfields including Atmospheric Science, Oceanography, Global and Planetary Change, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Ecology.

The scientist's main topics of research include:

  • Cryospheric studies and observations
  • Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
  • Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Winter Sports Injuries and Performance
  • Climate variability and models
  • Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
  • Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes

Tore Hattermann has published extensively in several prominent scientific venues. The most frequent publication venues include:

  • The Cryosphere
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans
  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Nature Communications

Some of their recent papers are:

  • Projected land ice contributions to twenty-first-century sea level rise, 2021, Nature
  • ISMIP6 Antarctica: a multi-model ensemble of the Antarctic ice sheet evolution over the 21st century, 2020, The Cryosphere
  • Experimental protocol for sea level projections from ISMIP6 stand-alone ice sheet models, 2020, The Cryosphere
  • Future Sea Level Change Under Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 and Phase 6 Scenarios From the Greenland and Antarctic Ice Sheets, 2021, Geophysical Research Letters
  • A protocol for calculating basal melt rates in the ISMIP6 Antarctic ice sheet projections, 2020, The Cryosphere

Tore Hattermann frequently collaborates with a number of coauthors, including:

  • Hélène Seroussi
  • Nicolas C. Jourdain
  • Benjamin K. Galton-Fenzi
  • Rupert Gladstone
  • Fiammetta Straneo

Best Publications

  • Projected land ice contributions to twenty-first-century sea level rise

    Tamsin L Edwards;Sophie Nowicki;Sophie Nowicki;Ben Marzeion;Regine Hock;Regine Hock

  • ISMIP6 Antarctica: a multi-model ensemble of the Antarctic ice sheet evolution over the 21st century

    Hélène Seroussi;Sophie Nowicki;Antony J. Payne;Heiko Goelzer;Heiko Goelzer

  • Eddy-driven recirculation of Atlantic Water in Fram Strait

    Tore Hattermann;Pål Erik Isachsen;Pål Erik Isachsen;Wilken-Jon von Appen;Jon Albretsen

  • Antarctic ice rises and rumples: Their properties and significance for ice-sheet dynamics and evolution

    Kenichi Matsuoka;Richard C. A. Hindmarsh;Geir Moholdt;Michael J. Bentley

  • Experimental design for three interrelated marine ice sheet and ocean model intercomparison projects: MISMIP v. 3 (MISMIP +), ISOMIP v. 2 (ISOMIP +) and MISOMIP v. 1 (MISOMIP1)

    Xylar S. Asay-Davis;Stephen L. Cornford;Gaël Durand;Gaël Durand;Benjamin K. Galton-Fenzi;Benjamin K. Galton-Fenzi

  • The Fate of the Southern Weddell Sea Continental Shelf in a Warming Climate

    Hartmut H. Hellmer;Frank Kauker;Ralph Timmermann;Tore Hattermann

  • The Weddell Gyre, Southern Ocean: Present Knowledge and Future Challenges

    M. Vernet;Walter Geibert;Mario Hoppema;P.J. Brown

  • Experimental protocol for sea level projections from ISMIP6 stand-alone ice sheet models

    Sophie Nowicki;Heiko Goelzer;Heiko Goelzer;Hélène Seroussi;Anthony J. Payne

  • Eddy overturning of the Antarctic Slope Front controls glacial melting in the Eastern Weddell Sea

    O. A. Nøst;M. Biuw;V. Tverberg;C. Lydersen

  • Seasonal Cycle of Mesoscale Instability of the West Spitsbergen Current

    Wilken-Jon von Appen;Ursula Schauer;Tore Hattermann;Agnieszka Beszczynska-Möller

  • Future Sea Level Change Under Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 and Phase 6 Scenarios From the Greenland and Antarctic Ice Sheets

    Antony J. Payne;Sophie Nowicki;Sophie Nowicki;Ayako Abe‐Ouchi;Cecile Agosta

  • Two years of oceanic observations below the Fimbul Ice Shelf, Antarctica

    Tore Hattermann;Ole Anders Nøst;Jonathan M. Lilly;Lars H. Smedsrud

  • Eddy-resolving simulations of the Fimbul Ice Shelf cavity circulation: Basal melting and exchange with open ocean

    Tore Hattermann;Lars Henrik Smedsrud;Ole Anders Nøst;Jonathan M. Lilly

  • A protocol for calculating basal melt rates in the ISMIP6 Antarctic ice sheet projections

    Nicolas C. Jourdain;Xylar Asay-Davis;Tore Hattermann;Tore Hattermann;Fiammetta Straneo

  • CMIP5 model selection for ISMIP6 ice sheet model forcing: Greenland and Antarctica

    Alice Barthel;Cécile Agosta;Christopher M. Little;Tore Hattermann;Tore Hattermann

  • Antarctic Thermocline Dynamics along a Narrow Shelf with Easterly Winds

    Tore Hattermann

  • Necessary Conditions for Warm Inflow Toward the Filchner Ice Shelf, Weddell Sea

    Kjersti Daae;Tore Hattermann;Elin Maria K. Darelius;Rachael D. Mueller

  • Upstream sources of the Denmark Strait Overflow : observations from a high-resolution mooring array

    Benjamin E. Harden;Robert S. Pickart;Hedinn Valdimarsson;Kjetil Våge

  • Large ice loss variability at Nioghalvfjerdsfjorden Glacier, Northeast-Greenland

    Christoph Mayer;Janin Schaffer;Tore Hattermann;Dana Floricioiu

  • Intercomparison of Antarctic ice-shelf, ocean, and sea-ice interactions simulated by MetROMS-iceshelf and FESOM 1.4

    Kaitlin A. Naughten;Kaitlin A. Naughten;Katrin J. Meissner;Benjamin K. Galton-Fenzi;Benjamin K. Galton-Fenzi;Matthew H. England

  • Experimental design for three interrelated Marine Ice-Sheet and Ocean Model Intercomparison Projects

    X. S. Asay-Davis;S. L. Cornford;G. Durand;G. Durand;B. K. Galton-Fenzi;B. K. Galton-Fenzi

  • Experimental protocol for sealevel projections from ISMIP6 standalone ice sheet models

    Sophie Nowicki;Antony J. Payne;Heiko Goelzer;Heiko Goelzer;Helene Seroussi

Frequent Co-Authors

Frank Pattyn
Frank Pattyn Université Libre de Bruxelles
Heiko Goelzer
Heiko Goelzer Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research
Hartmut Hellmer
Hartmut Hellmer Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research
Angelika Humbert
Angelika Humbert Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research
Keith W. Nicholls
Keith W. Nicholls Natural Environment Research Council
Sophie Nowicki
Sophie Nowicki University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Torsten Kanzow
Torsten Kanzow Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research
Nicolas C. Jourdain
Nicolas C. Jourdain Grenoble Alpes University
Olaf Eisen
Olaf Eisen University of Bremen
Jonathan M. Gregory
Jonathan M. Gregory University of Reading

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Earth Science opens many doors, but students often explore complementary fields to enhance their career prospects. For those with creative interests, a master of fine arts online offers flexibility and affordability while fostering artistic skills that can be applied in environmental communication and science visualization.

For professionals aiming to take on leadership roles in environmental agencies or companies, advanced business knowledge is crucial. Programs like the best online human resource management masters degree provide essential skills for managing teams and projects efficiently within scientific organizations.

Older adults seeking to pivot or enhance their expertise might find short-term, focused options appealing. Exploring one year degree programs for seniors can be a strategic choice to gain specialized knowledge without lengthy commitments.

Additionally, those interested in information management related to Earth Science should consider accredited programs like the mlis ala accredited programs. These prepare graduates for careers in library and information science, critical for research and data management in scientific fields.

Best Scientists Citing Tore Hattermann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles