World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
48
Citations
13154
World Ranking
6061
National Ranking
2733

Kenton O'Hara publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kenton O'Hara sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 166 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Kenton O'Hara D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kenton O'Hara sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kenton O'Hara is affiliated with Microsoft in the United States and focuses primarily on the field of Medicine. Their research spans several subfields including Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Radiation, and Sociology and Political Science.

Their main topics of work center around:

  • Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
  • Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Delphi Technique in Research

O'Hara has contributed to multiple research papers including:

  • "Evaluation of Deep Learning to Augment Image-Guided Radiotherapy for Head and Neck and Prostate Cancers" (2020) published in JAMA Network Open
  • "Intraoperative prediction of postanaesthesia care unit hypotension" (2021) published in British Journal of Anaesthesia
  • "Framing Machine Learning Opportunities for Hypotension Prediction in Perioperative Care: A Socio-technical Perspective" (2023) published in ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
  • "Sociodemographic and clinical features predictive of SARS-CoV-2 test positivity across healthcare visit-types" (2021) published in PLoS ONE
  • "Investigating Uncertainty in Postoperative Bleeding Management: Design Principles for Decision Support" (2022) published in Electronic workshops in computing

The frequent co-authors working with O'Hara include:

  • Melissa Bristow
  • Stephanie L. Hyland
  • Dustin R. Long
  • Monica S. Vavilala
  • Konstantina Palla

Publications have appeared across prominent venues such as:

  • JAMA Network Open
  • British Journal of Anaesthesia
  • ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
  • PLoS ONE
  • Electronic workshops in computing

Best Publications

  • Gamification. using game-design elements in non-gaming contexts

    Sebastian Deterding;Miguel Sicart;Lennart Nacke;Kenton O'Hara

  • A comparison of reading paper and on-line documents

    Kenton O'Hara;Abigail Sellen

  • Dealing with mobility: understanding access anytime, anywhere

    Mark Perry;Kenton O'hara;Abigail Sellen;Barry Brown

  • A diary study of work-related reading: design implications for digital reading devices

    Annette Adler;Anuj Gujar;Beverly L. Harrison;Kenton O'Hara

  • Everyday dwelling with WhatsApp

    Kenton P. O'Hara;Michael Massimi;Richard Harper;Simon Rubens

  • Place as a Practical Concern of Mobile Workers

    Barry Brown;Kenton O'Hara

  • Understanding geocaching practices and motivations

    Kenton O'Hara

  • Troubling Trends in Scientific Software Use

    Lucas N. Joppa;Greg McInerny;Greg McInerny;Richard Harper;Lara Salido

  • Consuming video on mobile devices

    Kenton O'Hara;April Slayden Mitchell;Alex Vorbau

  • Touchless interaction in surgery

    Kenton O'Hara;Gerardo Gonzalez;Abigail Sellen;Graeme Penney

  • The Effects of Operator Implementation Cost on Planfulness of Problem Solving and Learning

    Kenton P. O'Hara;Stephen J. Payne

  • Expertise effects on decision-making in sport are constrained by requisite response behaviours - a meta-analysis.

    Bruno Travassos;Duarte Araujo;Keith Davids;K. O'Hara

  • A diary study of information capture in working life

    Barry A. T. Brown;Abigail J. Sellen;Kenton P. O'Hara

  • Everyday practices with mobile video telephony

    Kenton O'Hara;Alison Black;Matthew Lipson

  • Public and Situated Displays: Social and Interactional Aspects of Shared Display Technologies

    K. O'Hara;M. Perry;E. Churchill;D. Russell

  • Understanding the materiality of writing from multiple sources

    Kenton P. O'hara;Alex Taylor;William Newman;Abigail J. Sellen

  • Let's Talk About Race: Identity, Chatbots, and AI

    Ari Schlesinger;Kenton P. O'Hara;Alex S. Taylor

  • Exploring the potential for touchless interaction in image-guided interventional radiology

    Rose Johnson;Kenton O'Hara;Abigail Sellen;Claire Cousins

  • On the naturalness of touchless: Putting the “interaction” back into NUI

    Kenton O'hara;Richard Harper;Helena Mentis;Abigail Sellen

  • Jukola: democratic music choice in a public space

    Kenton O'Hara;Matthew Lipson;Marcel Jansen;Axel Unger

  • Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

    Izdihar B Jamil;Kenton P A O'Hara;Mark Perry;Abe A Karnik

Frequent Co-Authors

Abigail Sellen
Abigail Sellen Microsoft (United States)
Richard Harper
Richard Harper Social Shaping Research
Jesper Kjeldskov
Jesper Kjeldskov Monash University
Sriram Subramanian
Sriram Subramanian University College London
Frank Vetere
Frank Vetere University of Melbourne
Antonio Criminisi
Antonio Criminisi Microsoft (United States)
Mikael B. Skov
Mikael B. Skov Aalborg University
Barry Brown
Barry Brown Stockholm University
Alex S. Taylor
Alex S. Taylor City, University of London
Mark S. Marshall
Mark S. Marshall Indiana University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring career paths in Computer Science can start at different levels of education. Many students begin with associate degrees, which offer foundational knowledge and can be completed quickly and affordably online. For those seeking advanced roles or deeper expertise, pursuing one of the affordable master's degrees online is a popular option and may lead to higher earning potential.

Doctoral programs also offer unique opportunities. The organizational leadership PhD is ideal for those interested in leading teams or driving innovation within tech-focused organizations. On the other hand, educators or professionals passionate about teaching might consider one of the best online edd programs in education leadership.

Online programs provide flexibility for both working professionals and full-time students, making career advancement in computer science more accessible than ever. Each degree pathway supports specific career goals, so choosing the right one is important for long-term success.

Best Scientists Citing Kenton O'Hara

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles