World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 46 6749 6555 405 400 251 10943

Anna L. Cox publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Anna L. Cox between 2000 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Anna L. Cox published across 27 years, from 2000 to 2026, averaging 11 papers a year. Output peaked at 31 publications in 2014. 15 of the 296 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 31. Peak 31 publications in 2014. 2000: 3 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 2 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 17 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 30 publications 2014: 31 publications 2015: 23 publications 2016: 28 publications 2017: 18 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 13 publications 2026: 2 publications
2000 2026

296 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Anna L. Cox: publications per year, 2000 to 2026
Year Publications
2000 3
2001 3
2002 3
2003 1
2004 2
2005 2
2006 10
2007 3
2008 17
2009 7
2010 7
2011 6
2012 14
2013 30
2014 31
2015 23
2016 28
2017 18
2018 13
2019 12
2020 10
2021 11
2022 9
2023 7
2024 11
2025 13
2026 2
Total 296
Download as CSV

Anna L. Cox publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anna L. Cox sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 242–251 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 251 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408 251
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Anna L. Cox D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anna L. Cox sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689 46
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Anna L. Cox is a researcher affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their academic work spans multiple disciplines, predominantly focusing on Psychology, Social Sciences, and Computer Science, with notable attention to subfields such as Sociology and Political Science, Human-Computer Interaction, Applied Psychology, Information Systems and Management, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

Their research covers several key topics including the impact of technology on adolescents, innovative human-technology interaction, digital mental health interventions, personal information management and user behavior, mental health research topics, usability and user interface design, as well as studies related to perfectionism, procrastination, and anxiety.

Anna L. Cox has contributed to numerous publications with recent papers including:

  • Ecological momentary interventions for mental health: A scoping review, 2021, PLoS ONE
  • Understanding users' perspectives on mobile apps for anxiety management, 2022, Frontiers in Digital Health
  • Evaluation of a novel intervention to reduce burnout in doctors-in-training using self-care and digital wellbeing strategies: a mixed-methods pilot, 2020, BMC Medical Education
  • What influences the selection of contextual cues when starting a new routine behaviour? An exploratory study, 2020, BMC Psychology
  • Designing gamified rewards to encourage repeated app selection: Effect of reward placement, 2021, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies

Frequent co-authors of Anna L. Cox include Duncan P. Brumby, Sandy J. J. Gould, Andreas Balaskas, Stephen M. Schueller, and Gavin Doherty, indicating collaborative work with experts in related fields.

Their research has appeared in respected venues such as:

  • CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts
  • International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
  • Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
  • Frontiers in Digital Health
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Best Publications

  • Measuring and defining the experience of immersion in games

    Charlene Jennett;Anna L. Cox;Paul Cairns;Samira Dhoparee

  • Questionnaires, in-depth interviews and focus groups

    Anne Adams;Anna L. Cox

  • Research Methods for Human-Computer Interaction

    Paul Cairns;Anna L. Cox

  • Beyond Self-Tracking and Reminders: Designing Smartphone Apps That Support Habit Formation

    Katarzyna Stawarz;Anna L. Cox;Ann Blandford

  • Assessing the Core Elements of the Gaming Experience.

    Eduardo H. Calvillo Gámez;Paul A. Cairns;Anna L. Cox

  • Immersion in Digital Games: Review of Gaming Experience Research

    P Cairns;A Cox;A Imran Nordin

  • Designing for dabblers and deterring drop-outs in citizen science

    Alexandra Eveleigh;Charlene Jennett;Ann Blandford;Philip Brohan

  • Cognitive Dimensions of Notations: Design Tools for Cognitive Technology

    Alan F. Blackwell;Carol Britton;Anna Louise Cox;Thomas R. G. Green

  • Motivations, learning and creativity in online citizen science

    Charlene Jennett;Laure Kloetzer;Daniel Schneider;Ioanna Iacovides

  • Don't forget your pill!: designing effective medication reminder apps that support users' daily routines

    Katarzyna Stawarz;Anna L. Cox;Ann Blandford

  • Design Frictions for Mindful Interactions: The Case for Microboundaries

    Anna L. Cox;Sandy J.J. Gould;Marta E. Cecchinato;Ioanna Iacovides

  • CHI '19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

    S. Brewster;G. Fitzpatrick;A. Cox;V. Kostakos

  • Investigating the information-seeking behaviour of academic lawyers: From Ellis's model to design

    Stephann Makri;Ann Blandford;Anna L. Cox

  • Not doing but thinking: the role of challenge in the gaming experience

    Anna Cox;Paul Cairns;Pari Shah;Michael Carroll

  • ‘At least they’re learning something’: the hazy line between collaboration and collusion

    Ruth Barrett;Anna L. Cox

  • Assessing the Core Elements of the Gaming Experience

    Eduardo H. Calvillo-Gámez;Paul Cairns;Anna L. Cox

  • Quantifying the Body and Caring for the Mind: Self-Tracking in Multiple Sclerosis

    Amid Ayobi;Paul Marshall;Anna L. Cox;Yunan Chen

  • “I want to be a captain! I want to be a captain!”: gamification in the old weather citizen science project

    Alexandra Eveleigh;Charlene Jennett;Stuart Lynn;Anna L. Cox

  • Do games attract or sustain engagement in citizen science?: a study of volunteer motivations

    Ioanna Iacovides;Charlene Jennett;Cassandra Cornish-Trestrail;Anna L. Cox

  • Smartwatches: the Good, the Bad and the Ugly?

    Marta E. Cecchinato;Anna L. Cox;Jon Bird

  • Recovering from an interruption: investigating speed-accuracy trade-offs in task resumption behavior.

    Duncan P. Brumby;Anna L. Cox;Jonathan Back;Sandy J. J. Gould

Frequent Co-Authors

Ann Blandford
Ann Blandford University College London
Paul Cairns
Paul Cairns University of York
Paul Marshall
Paul Marshall University of Bristol
Harold Thimbleby
Harold Thimbleby Swansea University
Regan L. Mandryk
Regan L. Mandryk University of Victoria
David W. Bates
David W. Bates Brigham and Women's Hospital
Sonia Johnson
Sonia Johnson University College London
Jorge Goncalves
Jorge Goncalves University of Melbourne
Paul Tae-Woo Lee
Paul Tae-Woo Lee Zhejiang University
Stephen M. Schueller
Stephen M. Schueller University of California, Irvine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Expanding your opportunities in computer science is now more accessible than ever, thanks to numerous online programs and certifications. Many students begin by exploring options such as an affordable data science degree, which can help you gain valuable analytical skills at a lower cost.

If you are interested in technology beyond software, consider an engineering pathway. Comparing electrical engineering online tuition costs can help you select an accredited program that fits your budget and career goals.

Looking for a shorter commitment? There are easy certifications that pay well, which can quickly boost your employability in tech, business, data analysis, and more.

For those ready to advance their careers rapidly, the quickest masters degree online options provide graduate credentials in under two years—sometimes even faster—so you can move up in your field without a lengthy study period.

Best Scientists Citing Anna L. Cox

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles