World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze

Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
50
Citations
9817
World Ranking
5633
National Ranking
340

Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze publications per year

1992: 1 publications 1993: 1 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 1 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 18 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 19 publications 2015: 20 publications 2016: 20 publications 2017: 19 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 25 publications 2020: 20 publications 2021: 21 publications 2022: 18 publications 2023: 18 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 12 publications
1992 2025

346 publications in total across all disciplines

Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 286 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their research spans various fields predominantly in computer science and psychology. Within these main fields, they have contributed significantly to cognitive neuroscience and social psychology, as well as to artificial intelligence, experimental and cognitive psychology, and computer vision and pattern recognition.

The scientist's research focuses on areas including action observation and synchronization, tactile and sensory interactions, musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation, multisensory perception and integration, emotion and mood recognition, human pose and action recognition, and social robot interaction and human-robot interaction (HRI).

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze include:

  • The Making of Meaning through Dyadic Haptic Affective Touch, 2022, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
  • Leveraging Activity Recognition to Enable Protective Behavior Detection in Continuous Data, 2021, Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
  • Effects of pitch and musical sounds on body-representations when moving with sound, 2022, Scientific Reports
  • Touch Technology in Affective Human-, Robot-, and Virtual-Human Interactions: A Survey, 2023, Proceedings of the IEEE
  • Bridging the gap between emotion and joint action, 2021, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Frequent co-authors of this researcher include Temitayo Olugbade, Amanda C de C Williams, Ana Tajadura-Jiménez, Aneesha Singh, and Youngjun Cho. The collaboration frequency varies, with the highest being sixteen publications with Temitayo Olugbade.

The researcher often publishes in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, Scientific Reports, and Frontiers in Computer Science.

Best Publications

  • Affective Body Expression Perception and Recognition: A Survey

    Andrea Kleinsmith;Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze

  • Does Body Movement Engage You More in Digital Game Play? and Why?

    Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze;Whan Woong Kim;Darshak Patel

  • Understanding the role of body movement in player engagement

    Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze

  • Cross-cultural differences in recognizing affect from body posture

    Andrea Kleinsmith;P. Ravindra De Silva;Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze

  • Movement-based sports video games: Investigating motivation and gaming experience

    Marco Pasch;Marco Pasch;Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze;Betsy van Dijk;Anton Nijholt

  • What Does Touch Tell Us about Emotions in Touchscreen-Based Gameplay?

    Yuan Gao;Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze;Hongying Meng

  • Automatic Recognition of Non-Acted Affective Postures

    A. Kleinsmith;N. Bianchi-Berthouze;A. Steed

  • Stirring up experience through movement in game play: effects on engagement and social behaviour

    Siân E. Lindley;James Le Couteur;Nadia L. Berthouze

  • Activity tracking: barriers, workarounds and customisation

    Daniel Harrison;Paul Marshall;Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze;Jon Bird

  • As Light as your Footsteps: Altering Walking Sounds to Change Perceived Body Weight, Emotional State and Gait

    Ana Tajadura-Jiménez;Maria Basia;Ophelia Deroy;Merle Fairhurst

  • The Automatic Detection of Chronic Pain-Related Expression: Requirements, Challenges and the Multimodal EmoPain Dataset

    Min S. H. Aung;Sebastian Kaltwang;Bernardino Romera-Paredes;Brais Martinez

  • DeepBreath: Deep learning of breathing patterns for automatic stress recognition using low-cost thermal imaging in unconstrained settings

    Youngjun Cho;Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze;Simon J. Julier

  • Recognizing Affective Dimensions from Body Posture

    Andrea Kleinsmith;Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze

  • Multilinear Multitask Learning

    Bernardino Romera-Paredes;Hane Aung;Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze;Massimiliano Pontil

  • Evaluating saliency map explanations for convolutional neural networks: a user study

    Ahmed Alqaraawi;Martin Schuessler;Philipp Weiß;Enrico Costanza

  • Embodiment in a Child-Like Talking Virtual Body Influences Object Size Perception, Self-Identification, and Subsequent Real Speaking.

    Ana Tajadura-Jiménez;Ana Tajadura-Jiménez;Domna Banakou;Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze;Mel Slater

  • Modeling human affective postures: an information theoretic characterization of posture features

    P. Ravindra De Silva;Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze

  • Robust tracking of respiratory rate in high-dynamic range scenes using mobile thermal imaging

    Youngjun Cho;Simon J. Julier;Nicolai Marquardt;Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze

  • Modeling Multimodal Expression of User's Affective Subjective Experience

    Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze;Christine L. Lisetti

  • A categorical approach to affective gesture recognition

    Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze;Andrea Kleinsmith

  • Exploiting Unrelated Tasks in Multi-Task Learning

    Bernardino Romera-Paredes;Andreas Argyriou;Nadia Berthouze;Massimiliano Pontil

  • Go-with-the-Flow: Tracking, Analysis and Sonification of Movement and Breathing to Build Confidence in Activity Despite Chronic Pain

    Aneesha Singh;Stefano Piana;Davide Pollarolo;Gualtiero Volpe

Frequent Co-Authors

Ana Tajadura-Jiménez
Ana Tajadura-Jiménez Carlos III University of Madrid
Nicolai Marquardt
Nicolai Marquardt Microsoft (United States)
Simon Julier
Simon Julier University College London
Hongying Meng
Hongying Meng Brunel University London
Nicholas D. Lane
Nicholas D. Lane University of Cambridge
Ophelia Deroy
Ophelia Deroy Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Frédéric Bevilacqua
Frédéric Bevilacqua Institut de Recherche et Coordination Acoustique Musique
Monica Gori
Monica Gori Italian Institute of Technology
Paul J. Watson
Paul J. Watson University of Tennessee at Chattanooga
Michel Valstar
Michel Valstar University of Nottingham

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens up a diverse range of online degree options and career pathways. Many students choose flexible learning by enrolling in accredited accelerated computer science degree online programs. These allow learners to fast-track their studies, gaining essential skills for high-demand roles in less time.

Computer Science also shares close ties with engineering and environmental fields, making it a gateway to many tech-focused careers. For those interested in environmental impact and sustainability, there are a variety of high-paying jobs with environmental science degree options. If you’re considering the intersection of engineering and ecology, pursuing an environmental engineer degree online provides the skills to tackle real-world environmental challenges.

Another popular pathway is engineering. An online degree in mechanical engineering can equip you with the technical expertise needed for innovation in manufacturing, robotics, and energy systems. With so many online programs available, it’s easier than ever to tailor your education to your career interests.

Best Scientists Citing Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles