World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 36 9613 8993 456 449 127 4493

Ophelia Deroy publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ophelia Deroy between 2010 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ophelia Deroy published across 16 years, from 2010 to 2025, averaging 11.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2025. 43 of the 188 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2010 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2025. 2010: 2 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 17 publications 2024: 21 publications 2025: 22 publications
2010 2025

188 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ophelia Deroy: publications per year, 2010 to 2025
Year Publications
2010 2
2011 3
2012 6
2013 17
2014 13
2015 12
2016 7
2017 9
2018 7
2019 6
2020 13
2021 16
2022 17
2023 17
2024 21
2025 22
Total 188
Download as CSV

Ophelia Deroy publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ophelia Deroy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 127 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670 127
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Ophelia Deroy D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ophelia Deroy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659 36
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Ophelia Deroy is affiliated with Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München in Germany. Their research spans significant areas within neuroscience and psychology, focusing particularly on cognitive and social dimensions.

The main fields of study in which they have contributed include:

  • Neuroscience
  • Psychology

Within these broad disciplines, their work delves into several subfields, with publications reflecting engagement in:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence

The primary research topics covered by Ophelia Deroy include:

  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Multisensory perception and integration
  • Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms

Their publication record features several recent papers, illustrating a focus on the intersection of social behavior, psychology, and sensory processing. Selected recent works include:

  • Social influence matters: We follow pandemic guidelines most when our close circle does (2021), published in British Journal of Psychology
  • Pandemics and the great evolutionary mismatch (2020), published in Current Biology
  • The Diversity Gap: When Diversity Matters for Knowledge (2021), published in Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • Digital contact does not promote wellbeing, but face-to-face contact does: A cross-national survey during the COVID-19 pandemic (2021), published in New Media & Society
  • Algorithm exploitation: Humans are keen to exploit benevolent AI (2021), published in iScience

Frequently appearing publication venues for Deroy include:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • iScience
  • Scientific Reports
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Consciousness and Cognition

Collaborative work is evident through repeated coauthorship with several researchers, notably:

  • Justin Sulik
  • Bahador Bahrami
  • Guillaume Dezecache
  • Marwa El Zein

Best Publications

  • The insectivore’s dilemma, and how to take the West out of it

    Ophelia Deroy;Ben Reade;Charles Spence

  • On tasty colours and colourful tastes? Assessing, explaining, and utilizing crossmodal correspondences between colours and basic tastes

    Charles Spence;Xiaoang Wan;Andy Woods;Carlos Velasco

  • Why we are not all synesthetes (not even weakly so).

    Ophelia Deroy;Charles Spence

  • As Light as your Footsteps: Altering Walking Sounds to Change Perceived Body Weight, Emotional State and Gait

    Ana Tajadura-Jiménez;Maria Basia;Ophelia Deroy;Merle Fairhurst

  • Crossmodal correspondences between odors and contingent features: odors, musical notes, and geometrical shapes.

    Ophelia Deroy;Anne-Sylvie Crisinel;Charles Spence

  • Hedonic mediation of the crossmodal correspondence between taste and shape

    Carlos Velasco;Andy T. Woods;Ophelia Deroy;Charles Spence

  • How automatic are crossmodal correspondences

    Charles Spence;Ophelia Deroy

  • “Having a drink in a bar”: An immersive approach to explore the effects of context on drink choice

    Carole Sester;Carole Sester;Carole Sester;Ophelia Deroy;Angela Sutan;Fabrice Galia

  • Crossmodal Mental Imagery

    Charles Spence;Ophelia Deroy

  • Metacognition in Multisensory Perception

    Ophelia Deroy;Charles Spence;Uta Noppeney

  • Reading the World through the Skin and Ears: A New Perspective on Sensory Substitution.

    Ophelia Deroy;Malika Auvray

  • Investigating consumers’ representations of beers through a free association task: A comparison between packaging and blind conditions

    Carole Sester;Carole Sester;Catherine Dacremont;Ophelia Deroy;Dominique Valentin

  • Object-sensitivity versus cognitive penetrability of perception

    Ophelia Deroy

  • Tasting Liquid Shapes: Investigating the Sensory Basis of Cross-modal Correspondences

    Ophelia Deroy;Dominique Valentin

  • Social influence matters: We follow pandemic guidelines most when our close circle does.

    Bahar Tunçgenç;Bahar Tunçgenç;Marwa El Zein;Marwa El Zein;Justin Sulik;Martha Newson;Martha Newson

  • Composing with Cross-modal Correspondences: Music and Odors in Concert

    Anne-Sylvie Crisinel;Caroline Jacquier;Ophelia Deroy;Charles Spence

  • Crossmodal correspondences: Innate or learned?

    Charles Spence;Ophelia Deroy

  • The plating manifesto (I): from decoration to creation

    Ophelia Deroy;Charles Michel;Betina Piqueras-Fiszman;Charles Spence

  • Multisensory constraints on awareness

    Ophelia Deroy;Yi-Chuan Chen;Charles Spence

  • Looking for crossmodal correspondences between classical music and fine wine

    Charles Spence;Liana Richards;Emma Kjellin;Anna-Maria Huhnt

Frequent Co-Authors

Charles Spence
Charles Spence University of Oxford
Ana Tajadura-Jiménez
Ana Tajadura-Jiménez Carlos III University of Madrid
Bahador Bahrami
Bahador Bahrami Max Planck Society
Vincent Hayward
Vincent Hayward Sorbonne University
Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze
Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze University College London
Carlos Velasco
Carlos Velasco BI Norwegian Business School
Andy T. Woods
Andy T. Woods University of Oxford
Uta Noppeney
Uta Noppeney University of Birmingham
Vittorio Gallese
Vittorio Gallese University of Parma
Betina Piqueras-Fiszman
Betina Piqueras-Fiszman Wageningen University & Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a degree in Psychology can open the door to a range of online programs and rewarding career pathways. One popular choice for graduates is becoming a Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT). The path to licensure depends on the state and even specific cities, so it’s important to research requirements before pursuing this career.

For students interested in practicing in California, understanding the San Francisco mft certification requirements and mft requirements in San Jose can help you prepare for local licensure. If you are aiming to work in Southern California, learn more about how to become a marriage and family therapist in Santa Ana. For those looking beyond California, it’s helpful to also review Scottsdale mft education requirements to understand differences in educational paths and supervised experience.

As you compare online degree options, make sure to check that your chosen program aligns with your desired career pathway and meets your target location’s requirements for licensure and certification.

Best Scientists Citing Ophelia Deroy

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles