World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 56 4237 3916 2363 2135 154 10919

Elena Plante publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Elena Plante between 1984 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Elena Plante published across 42 years, from 1984 to 2025, averaging 4 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2006. 4 of the 166 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2006. 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 2 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 3 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 2 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 12 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 3 publications
1984 2025

166 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Elena Plante: publications per year, 1984 to 2025
Year Publications
1984 1
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 1
1989 2
1990 1
1991 3
1992 1
1993 2
1994 4
1995 2
1996 3
1997 3
1998 6
1999 6
2000 5
2001 6
2002 5
2003 2
2004 5
2005 4
2006 12
2007 8
2008 4
2009 7
2010 6
2011 7
2012 4
2013 3
2014 12
2015 7
2016 3
2017 4
2018 3
2019 6
2020 5
2021 3
2022 3
2023 3
2024 1
2025 3
Total 166
Download as CSV

Elena Plante publications per year - data summary

  • Elena Plante, a Psychology scholar from University of Arizona, has 166 publications recorded across 42 years, from 1984 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1984 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive years are 2006 and 2014, with 12 publications each.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1984, 1988, 1990, 1992 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 3 of the 42 years in the span carry no publications at all (1985, 1986 and 1987).
  • The rate of publication averages 4.0 papers per year over the whole span, or 4.3 per year counting only the 39 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 13 publications, 8% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1984-1997: 23 publications (1.6 per year); 1998-2011: 83 publications (5.9 per year); 2012-2025: 60 publications (4.3 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Elena Plante publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elena Plante sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 151–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 154 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576 154
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Elena Plante publication distribution in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 69 ranges running from 31–40 to 705+ publications.
  • Elena Plante, a Psychology scholar from University of Arizona, records 154 publications - the 51st percentile of the discipline.
  • 51% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Elena Plante, and about 49% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 151–160 publications range, and Elena Plante falls inside that same range.
  • The most crowded range is 101–110 publications, holding 736 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 72% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 705 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Elena Plante D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elena Plante sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56–57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345 56
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Elena Plante D-index placement in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 58 ranges running from 30–31 to 144+ D-Index.
  • Elena Plante, a Psychology scholar from University of Arizona, records 56 D-Index - the 64th percentile of the discipline.
  • 64% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Elena Plante, and about 36% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 48–49 D-Index range, and Elena Plante ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32–33 D-Index, holding 702 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 68% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 58–59 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Elena Plante is affiliated with the University of Arizona in the United States and specializes in research within the field of psychology, with a focus on developmental and educational psychology. Their work spans clinical psychology, cognitive neuroscience, occupational therapy, and pediatrics, perinatology, and child health.

Their primary research topics include language development and disorders, reading and literacy development, neurobiology of language and bilingualism, stuttering research and treatment, family and disability support research, child and animal learning development, and assistive technology in communication and mobility.

Frequent publication venues for their research are:

  • Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research
  • American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
  • Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools
  • Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups

Elena Plante has collaborated regularly with several coauthors, including:

  • Alexander Tucci
  • Rebecca Vance
  • John Heilmann
  • Jon F. Miller
  • Nickola Wolf Nelson

Their recent papers include:

  • "Diagnosis of Developmental Language Disorder in Research Studies" (2020), Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research
  • "Assessing Functional Language in School-Aged Children Using Language Sample Analysis" (2020), Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups
  • "Evaluating the Equivalence of Telepractice and Traditional Administration of the Test of Integrated Language and Literacy Skills" (2022), Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools
  • "Predictors of Treatment Response for Preschool Children With Developmental Language Disorder" (2020), American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
  • "Translating Enhanced Conversational Recast to a Telepractice Setting" (2022), Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools

Best Publications

  • Selection of Preschool Language Tests

    Elena Plante;Rebecca Vance

  • Normal fMRI brain activation patterns in children performing a verb generation task.

    Scott K. Holland;Elena Plante;Anna Weber Byars;Richard H. Strawsburg

  • Time course of word identification and semantic integration in spoken language.

    Cyma Van Petten;Seana Coulson;Susan Rubin;Elena Plante

  • Eligibility Criteria for Language Impairment: Is the Low End of Normal Always Appropriate?

    Tammie J. Spaulding;Elena Plante;Kimberly A. Farinella

  • MRI findings in boys with specific language impairment.

    Elena Plante;Linda Swisher;Rebecca Vance;Steven Rapcsak

  • Functional MRI of language lateralization during development in children

    Scott K. Holland;Scott K. Holland;Jennifer Vannest;Marc Mecoli;Lisa M. Jacola

  • The Diagnostic Accuracy of Four Vocabulary Tests Administered to Preschool-Age Children

    Shelley Gray;Elena Plante;Rebecca Vance;Mary Henrichsen

  • Factors that influence lexical and semantic fast mapping of young children with specific language impairment.

    Mary Alt;Elena Plante

  • Memory and executive function in older adults: relationships with temporal and prefrontal gray matter volumes and white matter hyperintensities.

    Cyma Van Petten;Elena Plante;Patrick S.R Davidson;Trudy Y Kuo

  • Criteria for SLI: The Stark and Tallal Legacy and Beyond

    Elena Plante

  • A longitudinal functional magnetic resonance imaging study of language development in children 5 to 11 years old.

    Jerzy P. Szaflarski;Vincent J. Schmithorst;Vincent J. Schmithorst;Mekibib Altaye;Anna W. Byars

  • Semantic features in fast-mapping: performance of preschoolers with specific language impairment versus preschoolers with normal language.

    Mary Alt;Elena Plante;Marlena Creusere

  • Sustained Selective Attention Skills of Preschool Children With Specific Language Impairment: Evidence for Separate Attentional Capacities

    Tammie J. Spaulding;Elena Plante;Rebecca Vance

  • Practical Aspects of Conducting Large-Scale Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies in Children

    Anna Weber Byars;Scott K. Holland;Richard H. Strawsburg;Wendy Bommer

  • The neural substrates of writing: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study

    Pelagie M. Beeson;Steven Z. Rapcsak;Elena Plante;Jullyn Chargualaf

  • A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Investigation of Verbal Working Memory in Adolescents With Specific Language Impairment

    Susan Ellis Weismer;Elena Plante;Maura Jones;J. Bruce Tomblin

  • Left-handedness and language lateralization in children.

    Jerzy P. Szaflarski;Akila Rajagopal;Mekibib Altaye;Anna W. Byars

  • Variability in the language input to children enhances learning in a treatment context.

    Elena Plante;Trianna Ogilvie;Rebecca Vance;Jessica M. Aguilar

  • Cognitive Modules Utilized for Narrative Comprehension in Children: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

    Vincent J. Schmithorst;Scott K. Holland;Elena Plante

  • MRI findings in the parents and siblings of specifically language-impaired boys.

    Elena Plante

Frequent Co-Authors

Scott K. Holland
Scott K. Holland Medpace (United States)
Anna W. Byars
Anna W. Byars Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Vincent J. Schmithorst
Vincent J. Schmithorst University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
Jerzy P. Szaflarski
Jerzy P. Szaflarski University of Alabama at Birmingham
LouAnn Gerken
LouAnn Gerken University of Arizona
Jennifer Vannest
Jennifer Vannest Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Cyma Van Petten
Cyma Van Petten Binghamton University
Rebecca L. Gómez
Rebecca L. Gómez University of Arizona
Kenneth Hugdahl
Kenneth Hugdahl University of Bergen
Pélagie M. Beeson
Pélagie M. Beeson University of Arizona

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

A degree in psychology opens doors to a variety of online programs and career opportunities, especially in mental health and substance abuse counseling. Many students explore these pathways due to the rising demand for qualified professionals and the flexibility of remote studies.

If you’re interested in supporting individuals struggling with addiction, substance abuse counseling is a rewarding path. Requirements can vary by state and city. For instance, Philadelphia substance abuse counselor certification requirements and Phoenix substance abuse counselor certification requirements differ in terms of education, supervised experience, and licensing exams.

Similarly, many aspiring counselors investigate the steps for becoming a substance abuse counselor in Pittsburgh or learn about how to become a substance abuse counselor in Plano. These resources provide detailed information on academic credentials, required practicum hours, and local regulations.

Exploring related degrees such as counseling, social work, or clinical psychology can further expand your career options within the mental health field, both in-person and online.

Best Scientists Citing Elena Plante

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles