World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Mante S. Nieuwland

Mante S. Nieuwland

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
37
Citations
5637
World Ranking
9204
National Ranking
434

Mante S. Nieuwland publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mante S. Nieuwland sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 111 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Mante S. Nieuwland D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mante S. Nieuwland sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mante S. Nieuwland is affiliated with the Max Planck Society in Germany. Their research spans primarily across neuroscience and psychology, with a strong focus on cognitive neuroscience and developmental and educational psychology. Additional subfields in their work include artificial intelligence, experimental and cognitive psychology, and social psychology.

Their research topics cover several areas related to language and cognition, including:

  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Reading and Literacy Development
  • Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
  • Speech and dialogue systems
  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Language Development and Disorders
  • Text Readability and Simplification

Recent publications authored or co-authored by Nieuwland demonstrate contributions to the understanding of language comprehension and brain mechanisms. Notable papers include:

  • "Prediction during language comprehension: what is next?" (2023), published in Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • "Definitely saw it coming? The dual nature of the pre-nominal prediction effect" (2020), published in Cognition
  • "Dissociating activation and integration of discourse referents: Evidence from ERPs and oscillations" (2020), published in Radboud Repository (Radboud University)
  • "Anticipating words during spoken discourse comprehension: A large-scale, pre-registered replication study using brain potentials" (2020), published in Cortex
  • "Concurrent use of animacy and event-knowledge during comprehension: Evidence from event-related potentials" (2021), published in Neuropsychologia

Nieuwland has frequently published in journals such as Cognition, Cortex, Neuropsychologia, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, and the Radboud Repository (Radboud University).

The scientist collaborates with several frequent co-authors, including:

  • Cas W. Coopmans
  • Rachel Ryskin
  • Damien S. Fleur
  • Monique Flecken
  • Joost Rommers

Best Publications

  • When Peanuts Fall in Love: N400 Evidence for the Power of Discourse

    Mante S. Nieuwland;Jos J. A. Van Berkum;Jos J. A. Van Berkum

  • Large-scale replication study reveals a limit on probabilistic prediction in language comprehension

    Mante S. Nieuwland;Mante S. Nieuwland;Stephen Politzer-Ahles;Stephen Politzer-Ahles;Evelien Heyselaar;Katrien Segaert

  • When the Truth Is Not Too Hard to Handle: An Event-Related Potential Study on the Pragmatics of Negation

    Mante S. Nieuwland;Mante S. Nieuwland;Gina R. Kuperberg;Gina R. Kuperberg;Gina R. Kuperberg

  • Establishing reference in language comprehension: An electrophysiological perspective

    Jos J. A. Van Berkum;Arnout W. Koornneef;Marte Otten;Mante S. Nieuwland

  • Right or Wrong? The Brain's Fast Response to Morally Objectionable Statements

    Jos J. A. Van Berkum;Bregje Holleman;Mante S. Nieuwland;Mante S. Nieuwland;Marte Otten;Marte Otten

  • On the incrementality of pragmatic processing: An ERP investigation of informativeness and pragmatic abilities.

    Mante S. Nieuwland;Tali Ditman;Tali Ditman;Gina R. Kuperberg;Gina R. Kuperberg;Gina R. Kuperberg

  • Dissociable effects of prediction and integration during language comprehension: evidence from a large-scale study using brain potentials

    Mante S. Nieuwland;Mante S. Nieuwland;Dale J. Barr;Federica Bartolozzi;Federica Bartolozzi;Simon Busch-Moreno

  • Individual differences and contextual bias in pronoun resolution: Evidence from ERPs

    Mante S. Nieuwland;Jos J. A. Van Berkum

  • Using Theory of Mind to represent and take part in social interactions: Comparing individuals with high-functioning autism and typically developing controls

    Sander Begeer;Bertram F. Malle;Mante S. Nieuwland;Boaz Keysar

  • Testing the limits of the semantic illusion phenomenon: ERPs reveal temporary semantic change deafness in discourse comprehension

    Mante S. Nieuwland;Jos J. A. Van Berkum

  • Predicting form and meaning: Evidence from brain potentials

    Aine Ito;Martin Corley;Martin J. Pickering;Andrea E. Martin

  • Who are You Talking About? Tracking Discourse-level Referential Processing with Event-related Brain Potentials

    Mante S. Nieuwland;Marte Otten;Jos J. A. Van Berkum

  • Great expectations: Specific lexical anticipation influences the processing of spoken language

    Marte Otten;Mante S. Nieuwland;Mante S. Nieuwland;Mante S. Nieuwland;Jos J. A. Van Berkum

  • On sense and reference: examining the functional neuroanatomy of referential processing.

    Mante S. Nieuwland;Mante S. Nieuwland;Mante S. Nieuwland;Karl Magnus Petersson;Jos J. A. Van Berkum

  • Do 'early' brain responses reveal word form prediction during language comprehension? A critical review.

    Mante S. Nieuwland

  • If the real world were irrelevant, so to speak: The role of propositional truth-value in counterfactual sentence comprehension.

    Mante S. Nieuwland;Andrea E. Martin

  • The interplay between semantic and referential aspects of anaphoric noun phrase resolution: Evidence from ERPs

    Mante S. Nieuwland;Mante S. Nieuwland;Mante S. Nieuwland;Jos J. A. Van Berkum

  • Prediction during language comprehension: what is next?

    Unknown

  • How robust are prediction effects in language comprehension? Failure to replicate article-elicited N400 effects

    Aine Ito;Andrea E. Martin;Mante S. Nieuwland

  • Event-related brain potential evidence for animacy processing asymmetries during sentence comprehension

    Mante S. Nieuwland;Andrea E. Martin;Manuel Carreiras;Manuel Carreiras

  • “Who’s he?” Event-related brain potentials and unbound pronouns

    Mante S. Nieuwland

  • Quantification, prediction, and the online impact of sentence truth-value: Evidence from event-related potentials.

    Mante S. Nieuwland

  • Understanding Counterfactuality: A Review of Experimental Evidence for the Dual Meaning of Counterfactuals

    Eugenia Kulakova;Mante S. Nieuwland

Frequent Co-Authors

Jos J. A. Van Berkum
Jos J. A. Van Berkum Utrecht University
Manuel Carreiras
Manuel Carreiras Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language
Gina R. Kuperberg
Gina R. Kuperberg Tufts University
Martin J. Pickering
Martin J. Pickering University of Edinburgh
Falk Huettig
Falk Huettig Max Planck Society
David I. Donaldson
David I. Donaldson University of Stirling
Guillaume A. Rousselet
Guillaume A. Rousselet University of Glasgow
Martin Corley
Martin Corley University of Edinburgh
Wendy Johnson
Wendy Johnson University of Edinburgh
Thomas H. Bak
Thomas H. Bak University of Edinburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology in the USA opens doors to diverse online learning options and rewarding career pathways. Many students choose online bachelor's and master's programs to fit their studies into busy lives, often leading to careers as licensed therapists or counselors.

If you’re interested in clinical roles, each state has unique requirements for licensure. For example, those wondering how to become a licensed therapist in Gilbert will need to follow specific education and supervision guidelines. Similarly, reviewing licensed therapist requirements in Glendale is crucial for local compliance.

Education paths typically start with a relevant bachelor's degree, followed by a master's in counseling or psychology. Those interested in North Carolina should examine Greensboro licensed therapist education requirements. Likewise, for those aiming to practice in Nevada, understanding the Henderson licensed therapist requirements will be essential.

With accredited online programs and clear career pathways, students can flexibly meet state-specific requirements and move toward meaningful roles in mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Mante S. Nieuwland

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles