World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky

Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
41
Citations
7125
World Ranking
7895
National Ranking
467

Neuroscience

D-Index
41
Citations
7139
World Ranking
7836
National Ranking
229

Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 143 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky is affiliated with the University of South Australia in Australia. Their research is situated primarily within the field of neuroscience, with a focus on cognitive neuroscience. Their scholarly work spans multiple subfields including developmental and educational psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, language and linguistics, and artificial intelligence.

The scientist has contributed extensively to topics such as the neurobiology of language and bilingualism, neural dynamics and brain function, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, neural and behavioral psychology studies, functional brain connectivity studies, language development and disorders, as well as syntax, semantics, and linguistic variation.

Recent publications include these works:

  • "Oscillatory and Aperiodic Neural Activity Jointly Predict Language Learning," 2022, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
  • "Resting-state aperiodic neural dynamics predict individual differences in visuomotor performance and learning," 2021, Human Movement Science
  • "Neural signatures of syntactic variation in speech planning," 2021, PLoS Biology
  • "EEG and behavioral correlates of attentional processing while walking and navigating naturalistic environments," 2021, Scientific Reports
  • "Rapid adaptation of predictive models during language comprehension: Aperiodic EEG slope, individual alpha frequency and idea density modulate individual differences in real-time model updating," 2022, Frontiers in Psychology

Frequent co-authors working with Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky include:

  • Matthias Schlesewsky
  • Zachariah R. Cross
  • Maarten A. Immink
  • Alex Chatburn
  • Andrew W. Corcoran

Publication venues where this scientist has multiple contributions are:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Scientific Reports
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics

Best Publications

  • Two routes to actorhood: lexicalized potency to act and identification of the actor role

    Sabine Frenzel;Matthias Schlesewsky;Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky

  • An alternative perspective on "semantic P600" effects in language comprehension.

    Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky;Matthias Schlesewsky

  • The role of prominence information in the real time comprehension of transitive constructions: A cross-linguistic approach

    Ina D. Bornkessel-Schlesewsky;Matthias Schlesewsky

  • Reconciling time, space and function: A new dorsal–ventral stream model of sentence comprehension

    Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky;Matthias Schlesewsky

  • Neurobiological roots of language in primate audition: common computational properties.

    Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky;Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky;Matthias Schlesewsky;Steven L. Small;Josef P. Rauschecker

  • Subjective Impressions Do Not Mirror Online Reading Effort: Concurrent EEG-Eyetracking Evidence from the Reading of Books and Digital Media

    Franziska Kretzschmar;Dominique Pleimling;Jana Hosemann;Stephan Füssel

  • To Predict or Not to Predict: Influences of Task and Strategy on the Processing of Semantic Relations

    Dietmar Roehm;Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky;Frank Rösler;Matthias Schlesewsky

  • The P600-as-P3 hypothesis revisited: single-trial analyses reveal that the late EEG positivity following linguistically deviant material is reaction time aligned.

    Jona Sassenhagen;Jona Sassenhagen;Matthias Schlesewsky;Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky;Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky

  • Processing Syntax and Morphology: A Neurocognitive Perspective

    Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky;Matthias Schlesewsky

  • Toward a reliable, automated method of individual alpha frequency (IAF) quantification.

    Andrew W. Corcoran;Phillip M. Alday;Matthias Schlesewsky;Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky

  • Toward a Neurobiologically Plausible Model of Language-Related, Negative Event-Related Potentials.

    Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky;Matthias Schlesewsky

  • Think globally: cross-linguistic variation in electrophysiological activity during sentence comprehension.

    Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky;Franziska Kretzschmar;Franziska Kretzschmar;Sarah Tune;Luming Wang

  • The status of subject-object reanalyses in the language comprehension architecture

    Friederike S. Haupt;Matthias Schlesewsky;Dietmar Roehm;Angela D. Friederici

  • The Neurophysiology of Language Processing Shapes the Evolution of Grammar: Evidence from Case Marking

    Balthasar Bickel;Alena Witzlack-Makarevich;Kamal K. Choudhary;Matthias Schlesewsky

  • The neural mechanisms of word order processing revisited: electrophysiological evidence from Japanese.

    Susann Wolff;Matthias Schlesewsky;Masako Hirotani;Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky

  • The role of animacy in the real time comprehension of Mandarin Chinese: Evidence from auditory event-related brain potentials.

    Markus Philipp;Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky;Walter Bisang;Matthias Schlesewsky

  • The processing of German word stress: evidence for the prosodic hierarchy*

    Ulrike Domahs;Richard Wiese;Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky;Matthias Schlesewsky

  • On the universality of language comprehension strategies: evidence from Turkish.

    Şükrü Barış Demiral;Matthias Schlesewsky;Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky

  • The role of the posterior superior temporal sulcus in the processing of unmarked transitivity

    Tanja Grewe;Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky;Stefan Zysset;Richard Wiese

  • Linguistic prominence and Broca's area: the influence of animacy as a linearization principle.

    Tanja Grewe;Ina Bornkessel;Stefan Zysset;Richard Wiese

  • The N400 as a correlate of interpretively relevant linguistic rules: Evidence from Hindi

    Kamal Kumar Choudhary;Matthias Schlesewsky;Dietmar Roehm;Dietmar Roehm;Ina D. Bornkessel-Schlesewsky;Ina D. Bornkessel-Schlesewsky

Frequent Co-Authors

Matthias Schlesewsky
Matthias Schlesewsky University of South Australia
Tilo Kircher
Tilo Kircher Philipp University of Marburg
Martin Meyer
Martin Meyer University of Zurich
Steven L. Small
Steven L. Small The University of Texas at Dallas
Balthasar Bickel
Balthasar Bickel University of Zurich
Josef P. Rauschecker
Josef P. Rauschecker Georgetown University Medical Center
M. Gareth Gaskell
M. Gareth Gaskell University of York
Robert T. Knight
Robert T. Knight University of California, Berkeley
Angela D. Friederici
Angela D. Friederici Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences
Stefanie Hoehl
Stefanie Hoehl University of Vienna

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Earning a degree in psychology opens doors to a variety of rewarding careers, both in and beyond traditional therapy roles. Many students pursue psychology to become social workers, counselors, or mental health professionals. With growing demand for support services, states have specific requirements and study paths for aspiring social workers.

For example, learning the requirements to be a social worker in Indiana or understanding the requirements to be a social worker in Iowa can help you plan your education and license process. Similarly, those interested in practicing in Kansas should review Kansas social work education requirements. Aspiring professionals in Kentucky can find guidance on becoming a social worker in Kentucky.

Online psychology programs can also provide flexible pathways to these careers, allowing students to balance studies with other commitments. As you consider your next steps, be sure to research state-specific requirements and online degree opportunities tailored to your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles