World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Stefanie Hoehl

Stefanie Hoehl

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
41
Citations
5066
World Ranking
8012
National Ranking
38

Stefanie Hoehl publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stefanie Hoehl sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 186 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Stefanie Hoehl D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stefanie Hoehl sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stefanie Hoehl is affiliated with the University of Vienna in Austria and has a research focus primarily in psychology and neuroscience. Their work spans several interconnected fields including cognitive neuroscience, developmental and educational psychology, and social psychology.

The main research topics covered by Stefanie Hoehl include:

  • Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Infant Health and Development
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies

The scientist has contributed to various publication venues, reflecting a strong focus on developmental and cognitive neuroscience and psychology. Frequent venues include:

  • Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • NeuroImage
  • Child Development
  • Frontiers in Psychology

Stefanie Hoehl has collaborated extensively with other researchers. Frequent coauthors are:

  • Trinh Nguyen
  • Ezgi Kayhan
  • Moritz Köster
  • Miriam Langeloh
  • Christine Michel

Significant recent papers authored or coauthored by Stefanie Hoehl include:

  • Interactional synchrony: signals, mechanisms and benefits (2020), published in Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
  • Neural synchrony in mother-child conversation: Exploring the role of conversation patterns (2020), published in Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
  • Making Sense of the World: Infant Learning From a Predictive Processing Perspective (2020), published in Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • Interpersonal Neural Synchrony During Father-Child Problem Solving: An fNIRS Hyperscanning Study (2021), published in Child Development
  • Proximity and touch are associated with neural but not physiological synchrony in naturalistic mother-infant interactions (2021), published in NeuroImage

Best Publications

  • ‘Over-imitation’: A review and appraisal of a decade of research

    Stephanie Hoehl;Stephanie Hoehl;Stefanie Keupp;Hanna Schleihauf;Nicola McGuigan

  • Neural mechanisms of joint attention in infancy.

    Tricia Striano;Vincent M. Reid;Stefanie Hoehl

  • The effects of interaction quality on neural synchrony during mother-child problem solving.

    Trinh Nguyen;Hanna Schleihauf;Hanna Schleihauf;Hanna Schleihauf;Ezgi Kayhan;Ezgi Kayhan;Daniel Matthes

  • Interactional synchrony: signals, mechanisms and benefits.

    Stefanie Hoehl;Merle Fairhurst;Merle Fairhurst;Annett Schirmer

  • Recording infant ERP data for cognitive research.

    Stefanie Hoehl;Sebastian Wahl

  • Neural Processing of Eye Gaze and Threat‐Related Emotional Facial Expressions in Infancy

    Stefanie Hoehl;Tricia Striano

  • The neural correlates of infant and adult goal prediction: evidence for semantic processing systems.

    Vincent M. Reid;Stefanie Hoehl;Maren Grigutsch;Anna Groendahl

  • Neural synchrony in mother-child conversation: Exploring the role of conversation patterns.

    Trinh Nguyen;Hanna Schleihauf;Hanna Schleihauf;Hanna Schleihauf;Ezgi Kayhan;Ezgi Kayhan;Daniel Matthes

  • Young Infants' Neural Processing of Objects Is Affected by Eye Gaze Direction and Emotional Expression

    Stefanie Hoehl;Lisa Wiese;Tricia Striano

  • Interpersonal Neural Synchrony During Father–Child Problem Solving: An fNIRS Hyperscanning Study

    Unknown

  • The perception of biological motion by infants: An event-related potential study

    Vincent M. Reid;Stefanie Hoehl;Tricia Striano;Tricia Striano;Tricia Striano

  • Itsy Bitsy Spider…: Infants React with Increased Arousal to Spiders and Snakes.

    Stefanie Hoehl;Stefanie Hoehl;Kahl Hellmer;Maria Johansson;Gustaf Gredebäck

  • The development of emotional face and eye gaze processing

    Stefanie Hoehl;Tricia Striano;Tricia Striano

  • What are you looking at?:infants' neural processing of an adult's object-directed eye gaze

    Stefanie Hoehl;Vincent M. Reid;Jeanette Mooney;Tricia Striano

  • Making Sense of the World: Infant Learning From a Predictive Processing Perspective.

    Moritz Köster;Ezgi Kayhan;Ezgi Kayhan;Miriam Langeloh;Miriam Langeloh;Stefanie Hoehl

  • Setting the Frame: The Human Brain Activates a Basic Low-Frequency Network for Language Processing

    Gabriele Lohmann;Stefanie Hoehl;Stefanie Hoehl;Jens Brauer;Claudia Danielmeier

  • Proximity and touch are associated with neural but not physiological synchrony in naturalistic mother-infant interactions.

    Trinh Nguyen;Drew H. Abney;Dina Salamander;Bennett I. Bertenthal

  • Looking at eye gaze processing and its neural correlates in infancy-implications for social development and autism spectrum disorder.

    Stefanie Hoehl;Vincent M. Reid;Eugenio Parise;Andrea Handl

  • Sensitivity to triadic attention in early infancy

    Allison Cleveland;Daniel Stahl;Stefanie Hoehl;Arek Bialek

  • Neurobehavioral Interpersonal Synchrony in Early Development: The Role of Interactional Rhythms.

    Gabriela Markova;Trinh Nguyen;Stefanie Hoehl

  • Eye contact during live social interaction modulates infants' oscillatory brain activity.

    Stefanie Hoehl;Christine Michel;Vincent M. Reid;Eugenio Parise

  • Neural correlates of human-animal distinction: an ERP-study on early categorical differentiation with 4- and 7-month-old infants and adults.

    Vesna Marinović;Vesna Marinović;Stefanie Hoehl;Sabina Pauen

  • The early development of face processing – What makes faces special?

    Stefanie Hoehl

Frequent Co-Authors

Tricia Striano
Tricia Striano Hunter College
Bennett I. Bertenthal
Bennett I. Bertenthal Indiana University
Daniel Stahl
Daniel Stahl King's College London
Angela D. Friederici
Angela D. Friederici Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences
Bruno Rossion
Bruno Rossion University of Lorraine
Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky
Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky University of South Australia
Christian K. Tamnes
Christian K. Tamnes University of Oslo
Annett Schirmer
Annett Schirmer University of Innsbruck
Nelson Cowan
Nelson Cowan University of Missouri
Gary Lupyan
Gary Lupyan University of Wisconsin–Madison

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a psychology degree opens doors to a range of fulfilling careers, especially in mental health. One rapidly growing specialty is marriage and family therapy (MFT). Online psychology and counseling degrees can help you begin this path, but becoming a licensed therapist involves additional steps.

Each state has specific certification and education requirements if you want to specialize as a marriage and family therapist. For example, Raleigh mft certification requirements emphasize earning a master's degree, completing supervised clinical hours, and passing a national exam. The Reno mft certification requirements are similar, but may differ in the number of hours and specific coursework needed.

If you’re aiming to practice in Virginia, the Richmond mft education requirements also require specialized graduate study with practicum experience. Meanwhile, the Riverside mft education requirements in California highlight the importance of state-approved programs and unique licensure procedures.

Pursuing an online degree in psychology or counseling is an excellent first step, providing you with the academic foundation needed for further specialization and state-specific licensure.

Best Scientists Citing Stefanie Hoehl

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles