World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Psychology
Hungary
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 83 1255 1108 2 2 224 31103

Gergely Csibra publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Gergely Csibra between 1989 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Gergely Csibra published across 37 years, from 1989 to 2025, averaging 6.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2007. 11 of the 247 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2007. 1989: 1 publication 1990: 2 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 3 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 4 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 12 publications 2007: 18 publications 2008: 16 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 6 publications
1989 2025

247 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Gergely Csibra: publications per year, 1989 to 2025
Year Publications
1989 1
1990 2
1991 4
1992 2
1993 1
1994 1
1995 3
1996 6
1997 5
1998 7
1999 1
2000 4
2001 7
2002 2
2003 6
2004 4
2005 5
2006 12
2007 18
2008 16
2009 13
2010 9
2011 7
2012 3
2013 4
2014 5
2015 13
2016 6
2017 4
2018 12
2019 10
2020 14
2021 17
2022 6
2023 6
2024 5
2025 6
Total 247
Download as CSV

Gergely Csibra publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gergely Csibra sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 221–230 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 224 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283 224
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Gergely Csibra D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gergely Csibra sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 82–83 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112 83
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Psychology in Hungary Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Psychology in Hungary Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Psychology in Hungary Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Psychology in Hungary Leader Award
  • 2017 - Member of the National Academy of Sciences

Overview

Gergely Csibra is affiliated with the Central European University in Hungary. The primary fields of their research are Psychology and Social Sciences, with a focus on several subfields such as Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Cultural Studies.

The main topics of Csibra's work include Child and Animal Learning Development, Language and Cultural Evolution, Language Development and Disorders, Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation, Action Observation and Synchronization, Neuroendocrine Regulation and Behavior, and Autism Spectrum Disorder Research.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Csibra encompass diverse subjects and have been published across various academic venues. These include:

  • Do 15-month-old infants prefer helpers? A replication of Hamlin et al. (2007), 2020, Royal Society Open Science
  • A two-lab direct replication attempt of Southgate, Senju and Csibra (2007), 2021, Royal Society Open Science
  • Twelve-month-olds disambiguate new words using mutual-exclusivity inferences, 2021, Cognition
  • Witnessing, Remembering, and Testifying: Why the Past Is Special for Human Beings, 2020, Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • Computing Joint Action Costs: Co-Actors Minimize the Aggregate Individual Costs in an Action Sequence, 2021, Open Mind

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Csibra include:

  • Denis Tatone
  • Johannes Mahr
  • Barbu Revencu
  • Laura Schlingloff
  • Barbara Pomiechowska

The scientist has published notably in journals such as Open Mind, Royal Society Open Science, Cognition, Memory & Cognition, and Scientific Reports.

Among the awards received, Gergely Csibra was made a Member of the National Academy of Sciences in 2017.

Best Publications

  • Taking the intentional stance at 12 months of age

    György Gergely;Zoltán Nádasdy;Gergely Csibra;Szilvia Bíró

  • Eye contact detection in humans from birth

    Teresa Farroni;Gergely Csibra;Francesca Simion;Mark H. Johnson

  • Natural pedagogy

    Unknown

  • Teleological reasoning in infancy: the naı̈ve theory of rational action

    György Gergely;Gergely Csibra

  • Action Anticipation Through Attribution of False Belief by 2-Year-Olds

    Victoria Southgate;Atsushi Senju;Gergely Csibra

  • Natural pedagogy as evolutionary adaptation

    Gergely Csibra;György Gergely

  • Goal attribution without agency cues: the perception of ‘pure reason’ in infancy

    Gergely Csibra;György Gergely;György Gergely;Szilvia Bı́ró;Szilvia Bı́ró;Orsolya Koós

  • Gaze Following in Human Infants Depends on Communicative Signals

    Atsushi Senju;Gergely Csibra

  • Social learning and social cognition: The case for pedagogy

    Gergely Csibra;György Gergely

  • Sylvia's recipe: The role of imitation and pedagogy in the transmission of cultural knowledge

    György Gergely;Gergely Csibra

  • Newborns' preference for face-relevant stimuli: Effects of contrast polarity

    Teresa Farroni;Mark H. Johnson;Enrica Menon;Luisa Zulian

  • 'Obsessed with goals': functions and mechanisms of teleological interpretation of actions in humans.

    Gergely Csibra;György Gergely

  • Recognizing Communicative Intentions in Infancy

    Gergely Csibra

  • One-year-old infants use teleological representations of actions productively

    Gergely Csibra;Szilvia Bíró;Orsolya Koós;György Gergely

  • Seventeen‐month‐olds appeal to false beliefs to interpret others’ referential communication

    Victoria Southgate;Coralie Chevallier;Gergely Csibra;Gergely Csibra

  • Disordered visual processing and oscillatory brain activity in autism and Williams syndrome.

    Sarah J. Grice;Michael W. Spratling;Annette Karmiloff-Smith;Hanife Halit

  • Goal Attribution to Inanimate Agents by 6.5-Month-Old Infants.

    Gergely Csibra

  • Action mirroring and action understanding: an alternative account

    Gergely Csibra

  • The emergence of the social brain network: Evidence from typical and atypical development

    Mark H Johnson;Richard Griffin;Gergely Csibra;Hanife Halit

  • Why do we remember? the communicative function of episodic memory

    Johannes B. Mahr;Gergely Csibra

  • The social construction of the cultural mind: Imitative learning as a mechanism of human pedagogy

    György Gergely;Gergely Csibra

  • Action Anticipation Through Attribution of False Belief by

    Year-Olds Southgate;A. Senju;G. Csibra

Frequent Co-Authors

György Gergely
György Gergely Central European University
Victoria Southgate
Victoria Southgate University of Copenhagen
István Czigler
István Czigler Hungarian Academy of Sciences
Atsushi Senju
Atsushi Senju Birkbeck, University of London
Teresa Farroni
Teresa Farroni University of Padua
Tobias Grossmann
Tobias Grossmann University of Virginia
Teodora Gliga
Teodora Gliga University of East Anglia
Annette Karmiloff-Smith
Annette Karmiloff-Smith Birkbeck, University of London
Denis Mareschal
Denis Mareschal Birkbeck, University of London
Ádám Miklósi
Ádám Miklósi Eötvös Loránd University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are interested in studying psychology, you may also want to explore related disciplines such as social work, which share a strong focus on helping individuals and communities. Online degree options in these fields offer flexibility for students balancing work or family commitments.

For those considering a career in social work, there are excellent regional programs available. For example, you can review the best social work degree programs in Virginia and compare these to the best social work degrees in West Virginia. Both states provide accredited programs that fit a variety of educational and career goals.

If you are aiming for advanced credentials, explore the easiest online doctorate in social work degree programs in America, which could open doors to leadership roles or academic careers. For those who want to build on their undergraduate study, the easiest online social work master's programs in the US are designed to help you gain advanced skills while managing your current responsibilities.

Exploring these related degrees can help you find the right path to achieve your professional goals in psychology, social work, or other helping professions.

Best Scientists Citing Gergely Csibra

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles