World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Psychology
Hungary
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 90 968 846 1 1 382 25970

Ádám Miklósi publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ádám Miklósi between 1989 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ádám Miklósi published across 37 years, from 1989 to 2025, averaging 12.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 38 publications in 2014. 35 of the 464 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 38. Peak 38 publications in 2014. 1989: 2 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 3 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 8 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 12 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 23 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 32 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 24 publications 2013: 29 publications 2014: 38 publications 2015: 21 publications 2016: 20 publications 2017: 24 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 25 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 21 publications 2024: 18 publications 2025: 17 publications
1989 2025

464 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ádám Miklósi: publications per year, 1989 to 2025
Year Publications
1989 2
1990 0
1991 0
1992 1
1993 0
1994 1
1995 1
1996 3
1997 7
1998 4
1999 4
2000 1
2001 8
2002 8
2003 7
2004 8
2005 12
2006 9
2007 23
2008 10
2009 32
2010 14
2011 14
2012 24
2013 29
2014 38
2015 21
2016 20
2017 24
2018 16
2019 11
2020 25
2021 18
2022 13
2023 21
2024 18
2025 17
Total 464
Download as CSV

Ádám Miklósi publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ádám Miklósi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 381–390 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 382 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58 382
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Ádám Miklósi D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ádám Miklósi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 90–91 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 90 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77 90
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Psychology in Hungary Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Psychology in Hungary Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Psychology in Hungary Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Psychology in Hungary Leader Award
  • 2020 - Member of Academia Europaea

Overview

Ádám Miklósi is affiliated with Eötvös Loránd University in Hungary. Their research predominantly lies at the intersection of biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and psychology, with extensive work covering multiple related subfields such as genetics, social psychology, developmental and educational psychology, small animal studies, and molecular biology.

The main topics Ádám Miklósi focuses on include human-animal interaction studies, child and animal learning development, animal behavior and welfare studies, animal vocal communication and behavior, evolutionary psychology and human behavior, neuroendocrine regulation and behavior, and primate behavior and ecology.

The scientist has a significant number of publications in well-known venues. Frequent publication outlets include Scientific Reports, Animal Cognition, Biologia Futura, Research Square (Research Square), and Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research).

Notable recent papers by Ádám Miklósi feature a diverse range of subjects and publication years:

  • "JAK inhibition reduces SARS-CoV-2 liver infectivity and modulates inflammatory responses to reduce morbidity and mortality," 2020, Science Advances
  • "Genome-wide methylation profiling of glioblastoma cell-derived extracellular vesicle DNA allows tumor classification," 2021, Neuro-Oncology
  • "Challenges of machine learning model validation using correlated behaviour data: Evaluation of cross-validation strategies and accuracy measures," 2020, PLoS ONE
  • "Age influences domestic dog cognitive performance independent of average breed lifespan," 2020, Animal Cognition
  • "Comparative Brain Imaging Reveals Analogous and Divergent Patterns of Species and Face Sensitivity in Humans and Dogs," 2020, Journal of Neuroscience

Collaboration is a noticeable aspect of Ádám Miklósi's work, with frequent co-authors including Márta Gácsi, Enikő Kubinyi, Claudia Fugazza, Attila Andics, and Judit Abdai.

Among their recognitions, Ádám Miklósi was awarded membership of Academia Europaea in 2020.

Best Publications

  • A Simple Reason for a Big Difference: Wolves Do Not Look Back at Humans, but Dogs Do.

    Ádám Miklósi;Enikö Kubinyi;József Topál;Márta Gácsi

  • Dog Behaviour, Evolution, and Cognition

    Adam Miklosi

  • Attachment behavior in dogs (Canis familiaris): A new application of Ainsworth's (1969) Strange Situation Test.

    József Topál;Ádám Miklósi;Vilmos Csányi;Antal Dóka

  • Use of experimenter-given cues in dogs.

    Á. Miklösi;R. Polgárdi;J. Topál;V. Csányi

  • A comparative analysis of animals' understanding of the human pointing gesture

    Ádam Miklósi;Krisztina Soproni

  • Comprehension of human communicative signs in pet dogs (Canis familiaris).

    Krisztina Soproni;Adám Miklósi;József Topál;Vilmos Csányi

  • Intentional behaviour in dog-human communication: an experimental analysis of “showing” behaviour in the dog

    Ádám Miklósi;R. Polgárdi;József Topál;Vilmos Csányi

  • Comparative social cognition: what can dogs teach us?

    Á. Miklósi;J. Topál;V. Csányi

  • Dogs' (Canis familiaris) responsiveness to human pointing gestures.

    Krisztina Soproni;Ádám Miklósi;József Topál;Vilmos Csányi

  • Attachment to humans: a comparative study on hand-reared wolves and differently socialized dog puppies

    József Topál;Márta Gácsi;Ádám Miklósi;Zsófia Virányi

  • A comparative study of the use of visual communicative signals in interactions between dogs (Canis familiaris) and humans and cats (Felis catus) and humans

    Ádam Miklósi;Péter Pongrácz;Gabriella Lakatos;József Topál

  • Are readers of our face readers of our minds? Dogs (Canis familiaris) show situation-dependent recognition of human’s attention

    Márta Gácsi;Ádám Miklósi;Orsolya Varga;József Topál

  • Comprehension of human pointing gestures in young human-reared wolves (Canis lupus) and dogs (Canis familiaris)

    Zsófia Virányi;Márta Gácsi;Enikő Kubinyi;József Topál

  • What does it take to become 'best friends'? Evolutionary changes in canine social competence.

    Ádám Miklósi;József Topál

  • Differential sensitivity to human communication in dogs, wolves, and human infants

    József Topál;György Gergely;Ágnes Erdőhegyi;Gergely Csibra

  • Voice-Sensitive Regions in the Dog and Human Brain Are Revealed by Comparative fMRI

    Attila Andics;Márta Gácsi;Tamás Faragó;Anna Kis

  • Dogs respond appropriately to cues of humans’ attentional focus

    Zsófia Virányi;József Topál;Márta Gácsi;Ádám Miklósi

  • Dog and owner demographic characteristics and dog personality trait associations.

    Enikő Kubinyi;Borbála Turcsán;Ádám Miklósi

  • Human listeners are able to classify dog (Canis familiaris) barks recorded in different situations.

    Péter Pongrácz;Csaba Molnár;Ádám Miklósi;Vilmos Csányi

  • Infants' perseverative search errors are induced by pragmatic misinterpretation.

    József Topál;György Gergely;Ádám Miklósi;Ágnes Erdőhegyi

  • Attachment behavior of adult dogs (Canis familiaris) living at rescue centers: forming new bonds.

    Márta Gácsi;József Topál;Ádám Miklósi;Antal Dóka

Frequent Co-Authors

Márta Gácsi
Márta Gácsi Eötvös Loránd University
József Topál
József Topál Hungarian Academy of Sciences
Vilmos Csányi
Vilmos Csányi Eötvös Loránd University
Friederike Range
Friederike Range University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna
Richard J. Andrew
Richard J. Andrew University of Sussex
Zsófia Virányi
Zsófia Virányi University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna
Tamás Székely
Tamás Székely University of Bath
Ludwig Huber
Ludwig Huber University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna
György Gergely
György Gergely Central European University
Josep Call
Josep Call University of St Andrews

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a psychology degree opens doors to a wide range of online programs and specialized career pathways. Many students pursue advanced roles like marriage and family therapist (MFT), which can lead to rewarding opportunities in counseling, social work, and mental health support.

If you are interested in guidance on how to become a marriage and family therapist in Boise, there are unique licensure and education requirements to consider. Similarly, it’s important to research regional requirements—students in Massachusetts, for example, can explore the steps on how to become an mft in Boston.

Those hoping to practice in New York will find useful information on how to become a marriage and family therapist in Buffalo. Meanwhile, candidates in Arizona may refer to how to become an mft in Chandler for state-specific guidelines. Choosing the right online psychology degree and understanding local certification rules are vital first steps for anyone considering a career in therapy or counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Ádám Miklósi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles