World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
61
Citations
11656
World Ranking
3713
National Ranking
322

Peter Thier publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Thier sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 229 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Peter Thier D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Thier sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter Thier is affiliated with the University of Tübingen in Germany and is an active researcher in the field of neuroscience.

The primary focus of their work lies in several subfields, including cognitive neuroscience, neurology, social psychology, sensory systems, and cellular and molecular neuroscience.

Their research covers various main topics, such as:

  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Face recognition and perception
  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Vestibular and auditory disorders
  • Hearing, cochlea, tinnitus, genetics
  • Action observation and synchronization
  • Retinal development and disorders

Peter Thier has published extensively, with frequent appearances in venues including:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Neurophysiology
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • eNeuro

Some of their recent papers are:

  • Decoding of the other's focus of attention by a temporal cortex module, 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Using deep neural networks to detect complex spikes of cerebellar Purkinje cells, 2020, Journal of Neurophysiology
  • Cerebellar complex spikes multiplex complementary behavioral information, 2021, PLoS Biology
  • Multidimensional cerebellar computations for flexible kinematic control of movements, 2023, Nature Communications
  • Non-shared coding of observed and executed actions prevails in macaque ventral premotor mirror neurons, 2023, eLife

Peter Thier collaborates regularly with other researchers, frequently co-authoring with:

  • Peter W. Dicke
  • Silvia Spadacenta
  • Akshay Markanday
  • Junya Inoue
  • Hamidreza Ramezanpour

Best Publications

  • Parietal Lobe Contributions to Orientation in 3D Space

    Peter Thier;Hans-Otto Karnath

  • Gain Modulation: A Major Computational Principle of the Central Nervous System

    Emilio Salinas;Peter Thier

  • Neuron-specific contribution of the superior colliculus to overt and covert shifts of attention.

    Alla Ignashchenkova;Peter W Dicke;Thomas Haarmeier;Peter Thier

  • Mirror neurons differentially encode the peripersonal and extrapersonal space of monkeys

    Vittorio Caggiano;Leonardo Fogassi;Leonardo Fogassi;Leonardo Fogassi;Giacomo Rizzolatti;Giacomo Rizzolatti;Giacomo Rizzolatti;Peter Thier;Peter Thier;Peter Thier

  • Misattributions of agency in schizophrenia are based on imprecise predictions about the sensory consequences of one's actions

    Matthis Synofzik;Peter Thier;Dirk T. Leube;Peter Schlotterbeck

  • Saccadic Dysmetria and Adaptation after Lesions of the Cerebellar Cortex

    Shabtai Barash;Armenuhi Melikyan;Alexey Sivakov;Mingsha Zhang

  • The cerebellum updates predictions about the visual consequences of one's behavior.

    Matthis Synofzik;Axel Lindner;Peter Thier

  • Electrical Microstimulation Distinguishes Distinct Saccade-Related Areas in the Posterior Parietal Cortex

    Peter Thier;Richard A. Andersen

  • View-Based Encoding of Actions in Mirror Neurons of Area F5 in Macaque Premotor Cortex

    Vittorio Caggiano;Leonardo Fogassi;Leonardo Fogassi;Giacomo Rizzolatti;Giacomo Rizzolatti;Joern K. Pomper

  • Disorders of Agency in Schizophrenia Correlate with an Inability to Compensate for the Sensory Consequences of Actions

    Axel Lindner;Peter Thier;Tilo T.J. Kircher;Thomas Haarmeier

  • The neural basis of smooth-pursuit eye movements.

    Peter Thier;Uwe J Ilg

  • Specific influences of cerebellar dysfunctions on gait.

    Winfried Ilg;Heidrun Golla;Peter Thier;Martin A. Giese

  • False perception of motion in a patient who cannot compensate for eye movements

    Thomas Haarmeier;Peter Thier;Marc Repnow;Dirk Petersen

  • Reduced saccadic resilience and impaired saccadic adaptation due to cerebellar disease.

    Heidrun Golla;Konstantin Tziridis;Thomas Haarmeier;Nicolas Catz

  • A neuronal correlate of spatial stability during periods of self-induced visual motion

    R. G. Erickson;P. Thier

  • Encoding of movement time by populations of cerebellar Purkinje cells.

    Peter Thier;Peter W. Dicke;Roman Haas;Shabtai Barash

  • Responses of Visual-Tracking Neurons from Cortical Area MST-I to Visual, Eye and Head Motion.

    P. Thier;R. G. Erickson

  • Mirror neurons encode the subjective value of an observed action

    Vittorio Caggiano;Leonardo Fogassi;Giacomo Rizzolatti;Antonino Casile

  • Posterior parietal cortex neurons encode target motion in world-centered coordinates.

    Uwe J Ilg;Stefan Schumann;Peter Thier

  • Cerebellar complex spike firing is suitable to induce as well as to stabilize motor learning.

    Nicolas Catz;Peter W. Dicke;Peter Thier

  • The neural basis of smooth pursuit eye movements in the rhesus monkey brain.

    Uwe J. Ilg;Peter Thier

  • Unravelling cerebellar pathways with high temporal precision targeting motor and extensive sensory and parietal networks

    Fahad Sultan;Mark Augath;Salah Hamodeh;Yusuke Murayama

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin A. Giese
Martin A. Giese University of Tübingen
Cornelius Schwarz
Cornelius Schwarz University of Tübingen
Jürgen Bolz
Jürgen Bolz Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Erik De Schutter
Erik De Schutter Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology
Leonardo Fogassi
Leonardo Fogassi University of Parma
Giacomo Rizzolatti
Giacomo Rizzolatti University of Parma
Hans-Otto Karnath
Hans-Otto Karnath University of Tübingen
Johannes Dichgans
Johannes Dichgans University of Tübingen
Werner Lutzenberger
Werner Lutzenberger University of Tübingen
Ziad M. Hafed
Ziad M. Hafed University of Tübingen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Peter Thier

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles