World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
80
Citations
23015
World Ranking
1615
National Ranking
791

Amy J. Bastian publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amy J. Bastian sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 198 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Amy J. Bastian D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amy J. Bastian sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Amy J. Bastian is affiliated with the Kennedy Krieger Institute in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Neuroscience, with extensive contributions in related subfields including Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology, Biomedical Engineering, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, and Developmental and Educational Psychology.

The scientist's work covers several interconnected topics within neuroscience and rehabilitation:

  • Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Vestibular and auditory disorders
  • Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Children's Physical and Motor Development

Recent publications by Amy J. Bastian demonstrate the scope and focus of their research:

  • "Mechanisms of proprioceptive realignment in human motor learning," 2021, published in Current Opinion in Physiology
  • "Cerebellar patients have intact feedback control that can be leveraged to improve reaching," 2020, published in eLife
  • "Dissociation between abnormal motor synergies and impaired reaching dexterity after stroke," 2022, published in Journal of Neurophysiology
  • "Reinforcement Signaling Can Be Used to Reduce Elements of Cerebellar Reaching Ataxia," 2020, published in The Cerebellum
  • "Joint-level coordination patterns for split-belt walking across different speed ratios," 2023, published in Journal of Neurophysiology

The scientist frequently collaborates with several co-authors, showing important partnerships in their research community. Notable frequent co-authors include:

  • Jennifer Keller
  • Pablo Celnik
  • Ryan T. Roemmich
  • Nayo M. Hill
  • Laura A. Malone

Amy J. Bastian has contributed to a variety of scientific journals and publication venues, with multiple papers appearing in these key outlets:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • eLife
  • Journal of Neurophysiology
  • npj Science of Learning
  • Physical Therapy

Best Publications

  • Sensory Prediction Errors Drive Cerebellum-Dependent Adaptation of Reaching

    Ya-weng Tseng;Joern Diedrichsen;John W Krakauer;Reza Shadmehr

  • Throwing while looking through prisms. I. Focal olivocerebellar lesions impair adaptation.

    T. A. Martin;J. G. Keating;H. P. Goodkin;A. J. Bastian

  • Learning to predict the future: the cerebellum adapts feedforward movement control.

    Amy J Bastian

  • Cerebellar Contributions to Locomotor Adaptations during Splitbelt Treadmill Walking

    Susanne M. Morton;Amy J. Bastian

  • Cerebellar ataxia: abnormal control of interaction torques across multiple joints

    A. J. Bastian;T. A. Martin;J. G. Keating;W. T. Thach

  • Interlimb Coordination During Locomotion: What Can be Adapted and Stored?

    Darcy S. Reisman;Hannah J. Block;Hannah J. Block;Amy J. Bastian

  • Locomotor adaptation on a split-belt treadmill can improve walking symmetry post-stroke

    Darcy S. Reisman;Robert Wityk;Kenneth Silver;Amy J. Bastian

  • Cerebellar Control of Balance and Locomotion

    Susanne M. Morton;Amy J. Bastian

  • Throwing while looking through prisms II. Specificity and storage of multiple gaze-throw calibrations

    T. A. Martin;J. G. Keating;H. P. Goodkin;A. J. Bastian

  • Understanding sensorimotor adaptation and learning for rehabilitation

    Amy J. Bastian

  • Adaptation reveals independent control networks for human walking.

    Julia T Choi;Amy J Bastian;Amy J Bastian

  • Consensus Paper: Revisiting the Symptoms and Signs of Cerebellar Syndrome

    Florian Bodranghien;Amy Bastian;Carlo Casali;Mark Hallett

  • Sensory and motor deficits in children with cerebral palsy born preterm correlate with diffusion tensor imaging abnormalities in thalamocortical pathways

    Alexander H. Hoon;Elaine E. Stashinko;Lidia M. Nagae;Doris D.M. Lin

  • Split-belt treadmill adaptation transfers to overground walking in persons poststroke.

    Darcy S. Reisman;Robert J Wityk;Kenneth Silver;Amy J. Bastian

  • Repeated Split-Belt Treadmill Training Improves Poststroke Step Length Asymmetry

    Darcy S. Reisman;Heather McLean;Jennifer Keller;Kelly A. Danks

  • Thinking about walking: effects of conscious correction versus distraction on locomotor adaptation.

    Laura A. Malone;Amy J. Bastian;Amy J. Bastian

  • Definition and classification of negative motor signs in childhood

    Terence D. Sanger;Daofen Chen;Mauricio R. Delgado;Deborah Gaebler-Spira

  • Size of Error Affects Cerebellar Contributions to Motor Learning

    Sarah E. Criscimagna-Hemminger;Amy J. Bastian;Amy J. Bastian;Reza Shadmehr

  • Modulating locomotor adaptation with cerebellar stimulation

    Gowri Jayaram;Byron Tang;Rani Pallegadda;Erin Virgina Lamont Vasudevan

  • How do strength, sensation, spasticity and joint individuation relate to the reaching deficits of people with chronic hemiparesis?

    Kathleen M. Zackowski;A. W. Dromerick;S. A. Sahrmann;W. T. Thach

Frequent Co-Authors

Allison M. Okamura
Allison M. Okamura Stanford University
Pablo Celnik
Pablo Celnik Johns Hopkins University
Jonathan W. Mink
Jonathan W. Mink University of Rochester
Noah J. Cowan
Noah J. Cowan Johns Hopkins University
Stewart H. Mostofsky
Stewart H. Mostofsky Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Reza Shadmehr
Reza Shadmehr Johns Hopkins University
Jaynie F. Yang
Jaynie F. Yang University of Alberta
Mauricio R. Delgado
Mauricio R. Delgado The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Mario Manto
Mario Manto University of Mons
Joel S. Perlmutter
Joel S. Perlmutter Washington University in St. Louis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Amy J. Bastian

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles