World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
42
Citations
18027
World Ranking
19439
National Ranking
7928

Jill A. McMahon publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jill A. McMahon sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 64 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Jill A. McMahon D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jill A. McMahon sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jill A. McMahon is affiliated with the University of Southern California in the United States. Their research spans across the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, as well as Medicine. Specific subfields of focus include Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, and Genetics.

The scientist's main topics of work center on renal health and disease. These include:

  • Renal and related cancers
  • Renal cell carcinoma treatment
  • Biotin and Related Studies
  • Cellular transport and secretion
  • Genetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases
  • Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies
  • Click Chemistry and Applications

Jill A. McMahon has contributed to various academic journals, with multiple publications appearing in:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Nature Communications
  • Cell stem cell
  • Developmental Cell
  • Journal of the American Society of Nephrology

The following are selected recent papers authored or coauthored by Jill A. McMahon:

  • A scalable organoid model of human autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease for disease mechanism and drug discovery, 2022, Cell stem cell
  • Generation of patterned kidney organoids that recapitulate the adult kidney collecting duct system from expandable ureteric bud progenitors, 2021, Nature Communications
  • Proteomics of protein trafficking by in vivo tissue-specific labeling, 2021, Nature Communications
  • Spatial transcriptional mapping of the human nephrogenic program, 2021, Developmental Cell
  • Renoprotective and Immunomodulatory Effects of GDF15 following AKI Invoked by Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury, 2020, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology

Frequent coauthors in their research include:

  • Andrew P. McMahon
  • Jinjin Guo
  • Riana K. Parvez
  • Matthew E. Thornton
  • Albert D. Kim

Best Publications

  • Sonic hedgehog, a member of a family of putative signaling molecules, is implicated in the regulation of CNS polarity

    Yann Echelard;Douglas J. Epstein;Benoit St-Jacques;Liya Shen

  • Derivation of embryonic stem-cell lines from human blastocysts.

    Chad A. Cowan;Irinha Klimanskaya;Jill Mcmahon;Jocelyn Atienza

  • Conservation of the hedgehog/patched signaling pathway from flies to mice: induction of a mouse patched gene by Hedgehog.

    Lisa V. Goodrich;Ronald L. Johnson;Ljiljana Milenkovic;Jill A. McMahon

  • Noggin-mediated antagonism of BMP signaling is required for growth and patterning of the neural tube and somite

    Jill A. McMahon;Shinji Takada;Lyle B. Zimmerman;Chen-Ming Fan

  • Noggin, Cartilage Morphogenesis, and Joint Formation in the Mammalian Skeleton

    Lisa J. Brunet;Jill A. McMahon;Jill A. McMahon;Andrew P. McMahon;Andrew P. McMahon;Richard M. Harland;Richard M. Harland

  • Wnt-3a regulates somite and tailbud formation in the mouse embryo.

    Shinji Takada;Kevin L. Stark;Martin J. Shea;Galya Vassileva

  • The midbrain-hindbrain phenotype of Wnt-1−Wnt-1− mice results from stepwise deletion of engrailed-expressing cells by 9.5 days postcoitum

    A.P. McMahon;A.L. Joyner;A. Bradley;J.A. McMahon

  • Sonic hedgehog signaling is essential for hair development

    B. St-Jacques;H.R. Dassule;I. Karavanova;V.A. Botchkarev

  • Multistep signaling requirements for pituitary organogenesis in vivo

    Mathias Treier;Anatoli S. Gleiberman;Shawn M. O’Connell;Daniel P. Szeto

  • The organizer factors Chordin and Noggin are required for mouse forebrain development

    Daniel Bachiller;John Klingensmith;C. Kemp;J. A. Belo

  • Canonical Wnt Signaling Regulates Organ-Specific Assembly and Differentiation of CNS Vasculature

    Jan M. Stenman;Jay Rajagopal;Thomas J. Carroll;Makoto Ishibashi;Makoto Ishibashi

  • Essential function of Wnt-4 in mammary gland development downstream of progesterone signaling

    Cathrin Brisken;Anna Heineman;Tony Chavarria;Brian Elenbaas

  • Xwnt-8, a Xenopus Wnt-1/int-1-related gene responsive to mesoderm-inducing growth factors, may play a role in ventral mesodermal patterning during embryogenesis.

    Jan L. Christian;Jill A. McMahon;Andrew P. McMahon;Randall T. Moon

  • Wnt11 and Ret/Gdnf pathways cooperate in regulating ureteric branching during metanephric kidney development.

    Arindam Majumdar;Seppo Vainio;Andreas Kispert;Jill McMahon

  • Noggin is a mesenchymally derived stimulator of hair-follicle induction

    Vladimir A. Botchkarev;Natalia V. Botchkareva;Wera Roth;Motonobu Nakamura

  • Cholesterol Modification of Sonic Hedgehog Is Required for Long-Range Signaling Activity and Effective Modulation of Signaling by Ptc1

    Paula M. Lewis;Matthew P. Dunn;Jill A. McMahon;Malcolm Logan

  • Ihh signaling is directly required for the osteoblast lineage in the endochondral skeleton

    Fanxin Long;Ung-il Chung;Shinsuke Ohba;Jill McMahon

  • Osr1 expression demarcates a multi-potent population of intermediate mesoderm that undergoes progressive restriction to an Osr1-dependent nephron progenitor compartment within the mammalian kidney.

    Joshua W. Mugford;Petra Sipilä;Jill A. McMahon;Andrew P. McMahon

  • Wnt expression patterns in chick embryo nervous system.

    Margaret Hollyday;Jill A. McMahon;Andrew P. McMahon

  • A direct requirement for Hedgehog signaling for normal specification of all ventral progenitor domains in the presumptive mammalian spinal cord

    Mark Wijgerde;Jill A. McMahon;Michael Rule;Andrew P. McMahon

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrew P. McMahon
Andrew P. McMahon University of Southern California
Andrew D. Smith
Andrew D. Smith University of Southern California
Shinji Takada
Shinji Takada National Institutes of Natural Sciences
Olga G. Troyanskaya
Olga G. Troyanskaya Princeton University
Norbert Perrimon
Norbert Perrimon Harvard University
Melissa H. Little
Melissa H. Little Murdoch Children's Research Institute
Vladimir A. Botchkarev
Vladimir A. Botchkarev Boston University
David J. Anderson
David J. Anderson California Institute of Technology
David H. Ellison
David H. Ellison Oregon Health & Science University
Ralf Paus
Ralf Paus University of Miami

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens the door to diverse online degrees and in-demand healthcare careers. Many students are now exploring flexible learning options to qualify for roles in healthcare, research, and technology.

For those interested in the intersection of biology and healthcare data, earning a him degree online provides strong prospects in medical data management and information security.

Nutrition is another growing field blending biochemistry and health. Pursuing the cheapest online master's in nutrition can lead to fulfilling roles as dietitians, nutrition consultants, or public health experts.

Students can also explore hands-on medical technology. Accredited ultrasound tech programs online are ideal for those interested in diagnostic imaging and direct patient care.

Alternatively, enrolling in the best online radiology tech programs offers a pathway to careers in medical imaging and radiologic technology.

These online programs allow students to balance studies with other commitments while building expertise for rewarding careers in the ever-evolving healthcare industry.

Best Scientists Citing Jill A. McMahon

Trending Scientists