World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
52
Citations
10173
World Ranking
5114
National Ranking
233

Matthias Weidlich publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthias Weidlich sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 243 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Matthias Weidlich D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthias Weidlich sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Matthias Weidlich is affiliated with Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin in Germany. Their research spans the fields of computer science and business management, with a particular focus on business process modeling and analysis, semantic web and ontologies, and privacy-preserving technologies in data. Their academic contributions cover multiple subfields including artificial intelligence, management information systems, and computer networks and communications.

The scientist's publication record includes works in various prominent venues. Frequent publication venues include arXiv (Cornell University), Information Systems, Proceedings of the ACM on Management of Data, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, and KI - Künstliche Intelligenz.

Matthias Weidlich has authored papers on diverse topics related to dynamic systems, prescriptive process monitoring, and recommender systems, among others. Recent notable papers include:

  • Monotone Precision and Recall Measures for Comparing Executions and Specifications of Dynamic Systems (2020, ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology)
  • Fire now, fire later: alarm-based systems for prescriptive process monitoring (2021, Knowledge and Information Systems)
  • Manipulating Recommender Systems: A Survey of Poisoning Attacks and Countermeasures (2024, ACM Computing Surveys)
  • Large Process Models: A Vision for Business Process Management in the Age of Generative AI (2024, KI - Künstliche Intelligenz)
  • Efficient streaming subgraph isomorphism with graph neural networks (2021, Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment)

Their frequent co-authors include Stephan A. Fahrenkrog-Petersen, Quoc Viet Hung Nguyen, Han van der Aa, Hongzhi Yin, and Thành Tâm Nguyên. These collaborations reflect interdisciplinary engagement within information systems and artificial intelligence research communities.

Matthias Weidlich also contributed to book publications, notably the "Process Mining Workshops" published by Springer Science+Business Media in 2023.

The scientist's main research topics encompass:

  • Business Process Modeling and Analysis
  • Semantic Web and Ontologies
  • Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services
  • Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Data Quality and Management
  • Advanced Database Systems and Queries
  • Complex Network Analysis Techniques

Their work is situated at the intersection of technical and managerial aspects of information systems, contributing to the understanding and advancement of academic and applied research in large-scale data and process models.

Best Publications

  • Process Mining Manifesto

    Wil van der Aalst;Wil van der Aalst;Arya Adriansyah;Ana Karla Alves de Medeiros;Franco Arcieri

  • Blockchains for Business Process Management - Challenges and Opportunities

    Jan Mendling;Ingo Weber;Wil Van Der Aalst;Jan Vom Brocke

  • Conformance checking : relating processes and models, relating processes and models

    Josep Carmona;Boudewijn van Dongen;Andreas Solti;Matthias Weidlich

  • Efficient Consistency Measurement Based on Behavioral Profiles of Process Models

    M Weidlich;J Mendling;M Weske

  • The Internet of Things Meets Business Process Management: A Manifesto

    Christian Janiesch;Agnes Koschmider;Massimo Mecella;Barbara Weber

  • The ICoP framework: identification of correspondences between process models

    M. Weidlich;R.M. Dijkman;J. Mendling

  • Declarative versus imperative process modeling languages : the issue of understandability

    Dirk Fahland;Daniel Lübke;Jan Mendling;Hajo A. Reijers

  • Behavioral similarity: a proper metric

    Matthias Kunze;Matthias Weidlich;Mathias Weske

  • Process compliance analysis based on behavioural profiles

    Matthias Weidlich;Artem Polyvyanyy;Nirmit Desai;Jan Mendling

  • Queue mining for delay prediction in multi-class service processes

    Arik Senderovich;Matthias Weidlich;Avigdor Gal;Avishai Mandelbaum

  • SABER: Window-Based Hybrid Stream Processing for Heterogeneous Architectures

    Alexandros Koliousis;Matthias Weidlich;Raul Castro Fernandez;Alexander L. Wolf

  • Visually specifying compliance rules and explaining their violations for business processes

    Ahmed Awad;Matthias Weidlich;Mathias Weske

  • Traveling time prediction in scheduled transportation with journey segments

    Avigdor Gal;Avishai Mandelbaum;François Schnitzler;Arik Senderovich

  • Heterogeneous Stream Processing and Crowdsourcing for Urban Traffic Management

    Alexander Artikis;Matthias Weidlich;Francois Schnitzler;Ioannis Boutsis

  • Queue Mining – Predicting Delays in Service Processes

    Arik Senderovich;Matthias Weidlich;Avigdor Gal;Avishai Mandelbaum

  • Minimizing Efforts in Validating Crowd Answers

    Nguyen Quoc Viet Hung;Duong Chi Thang;Matthias Weidlich;Karl Aberer

  • Specification, Verification and Explanation of Violation for Data Aware Compliance Rules

    Ahmed Awad;Matthias Weidlich;Mathias Weske

  • Probabilistic optimization of semantic process model matching

    Henrik Leopold;Mathias Niepert;Matthias Weidlich;Jan Mendling

  • Styles in business process modeling: an exploration and a model

    Jakob Pinggera;Pnina Soffer;Dirk Fahland;Matthias Weidlich

  • BPEL to BPMN: The Myth of a Straight-Forward Mapping

    Matthias Weidlich;Gero Decker;Alexander Großkopf;Mathias Weske

  • Declarative versus Imperative Process Modeling Languages: The Issue of Maintainability

    Dirk Fahland;Jan Mendling;Hajo A. Reijers;Barbara Weber

  • Blockchains for Business Process Management - Challenges and Opportunities

    Jan Mendling;Ingo Weber;Wil van der Aalst;Jan vom Brocke

Frequent Co-Authors

Jan Mendling
Jan Mendling Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Avigdor Gal
Avigdor Gal Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Mathias Weske
Mathias Weske Hasso Plattner Institute
Artem Polyvyanyy
Artem Polyvyanyy University of Melbourne
Barbara Weber
Barbara Weber University of St. Gallen
Hongzhi Yin
Hongzhi Yin University of Queensland
Karl Aberer
Karl Aberer École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Boudewijn F. van Dongen
Boudewijn F. van Dongen Eindhoven University of Technology
Dirk Fahland
Dirk Fahland Eindhoven University of Technology
Avishai Mandelbaum
Avishai Mandelbaum Technion – Israel Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to various related online degrees and dynamic career paths. Many students also consider programs in engineering and scientific fields closely linked to computer science for more diverse opportunities.

For those interested in engineering and technology, pursuing the cheapest online mechanical engineering degree can be a cost-effective way to enter a high-demand sector. Similarly, a bachelor of science in physics online blends fundamental science knowledge with computational skills increasingly sought after in modern workplaces.

Data science is another booming area, combining programming, analytics, and statistics. Prospective students should consider affordable data science programs that allow for flexible, remote learning without compromising on curriculum quality.

Lastly, those intrigued by electronics and digital systems might explore online electrical engineering courses USA. These can prepare graduates for innovation in sectors like automation, telecommunications, and embedded systems.

Combining computer science with related disciplines broadens career prospects and allows for more specialized or interdisciplinary roles in today’s tech-driven job market.

Best Scientists Citing Matthias Weidlich

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles