World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
43
Citations
9199
World Ranking
7894
National Ranking
383

Ingo Weber publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ingo Weber sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 189 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Ingo Weber D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ingo Weber sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2020 - ACM Senior Member

Overview

Ingo Weber is affiliated with the Technical University of Berlin in Germany. Their research spans several interconnected fields within computer science and business management, focusing primarily on the intersection of technology and organizational processes.

The main fields of study for Ingo Weber include:

  • Computer Science
  • Business, Management and Accounting

Within these fields, their work delves deeply into subfields such as:

  • Information Systems
  • Management Information Systems
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Management Science and Operations Research

Key research topics covered by Weber comprise:

  • Business Process Modeling and Analysis
  • Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Cloud Data Security Solutions
  • Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services
  • Cloud Computing and Resource Management
  • Cryptography and Data Security
  • Big Data and Business Intelligence

The scientist has a significant publication record with notable papers, including:

  • "The biggest business process management problems to solve before we die", published in 2023 in Computers in Industry
  • "AI-augmented Business Process Management Systems: A Research Manifesto", published in 2023 in ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems
  • "BPMN in healthcare: Challenges and best practices", published in 2022 in Information Systems
  • "Controlled flexibility in blockchain-based collaborative business processes", published in 2020 in Information Systems
  • "Hyper-parameter optimization in classification: To-do or not-to-do", published in 2020 in Pattern Recognition

Ingo Weber's frequent collaborators include:

  • Luise Pufahl
  • Fabian Stiehle
  • Claudio Di Ciccio
  • Edoardo Marangone
  • Richard Hobeck

The scientist regularly publishes in various academic venues, with a focus on:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Information Systems
  • KI - Künstliche Intelligenz
  • Digital Finance
  • Computers in Industry

Ingo Weber has also contributed to academic literature through book publications, including a volume published by Springer Science+Business Media titled Business Process Management: Blockchain and Robotic Process Automation Forum in 2021.

Recognition of Weber's professional standing includes the award of ACM Senior Member status in 2020, denoting a certain level of achievement within the computing community.

Best Publications

  • A Taxonomy of Blockchain-Based Systems for Architecture Design

    Xiwei Xu;Ingo Weber;Mark Staples;Liming Zhu

  • Devops: A Software Architect's Perspective

    Len Bass;Ingo Weber;Liming Zhu

  • Blockchains for Business Process Management - Challenges and Opportunities

    Jan Mendling;Ingo Weber;Wil Van Der Aalst;Jan Vom Brocke

  • Untrusted business process monitoring and execution using blockchain

    Ingo Weber;Ingo Weber;Xiwei Xu;Xiwei Xu;Régis Riveret;Guido Governatori

  • Architecture for Blockchain Applications

    Xiwei Xu;Ingo Weber;Mark Staples

  • Optimized Execution of Business Processes on Blockchain

    Luciano García-Bañuelos;Alexander Ponomarev;Marlon Dumas;Ingo Weber;Ingo Weber

  • How do machine learning, robotic process automation, and blockchains affect the human factor in business process management?

    Jan Mendling;Gero Decker;Richard Hull;Richard Hull;Hajo A. Reijers

  • Caterpillar: A business process execution engine on the Ethereum blockchain

    Orlenys López‐Pintado;Luciano García‐Bañuelos;Luciano García‐Bañuelos;Marlon Dumas;Ingo Weber;Ingo Weber

  • On Availability for Blockchain-Based Systems

    Ingo Weber;Vincent Gramoli;Alex Ponomarev;Mark Staples

  • Runtime verification for business processes utilizing the Bitcoin blockchain

    Christoph Prybila;Stefan Schulte;Christoph Hochreiner;Ingo Weber

  • Detecting Regulatory Compliance for Business Process Models through Semantic Annotations

    Guido Governatori;Jörg Hoffmann;Shazia Wasim Sadiq;Ingo Weber

  • Foundational Oracle Patterns: Connecting Blockchain to the Off-Chain World

    Roman Mühlberger;Stefan Bachhofner;Eduardo Castelló Ferrer;Claudio Di Ciccio

  • A Pattern Collection for Blockchain-based Applications

    Xiwei Xu;Cesare Pautasso;Liming Zhu;Qinghua Lu

  • Beyond soundness: on the verification of semantic business process models

    Ingo Weber;Jörg Hoffmann;Jan Mendling

  • Caterpillar: A Blockchain-Based Business Process Management System.

    Orlenys López-Pintado;Luciano García-Bañuelos;Marlon Dumas;Ingo Weber

  • User-friendly semantic annotation in business process modeling

    Matthias Born;Florian Dörr;Ingo Weber

  • Elastic Business Process Management

    Stefan Schulte;Christian Janiesch;Srikumar Venugopal;Ingo Weber

  • Risks and opportunities for systems using blockchain and smart contracts

    Mark Staples;Shiping Chen;Sara Falamaki;Alex Ponomarev

  • Comparing Blockchain and Cloud Services for Business Process Execution

    Paul Rimba;An Binh Tran;Ingo Weber;Mark Staples

  • Integrated model-driven engineering of blockchain applications for business processes and asset management

    Qinghua Lu;An Binh Tran;Ingo Weber;Hugo O'Connor

  • Lorikeet: A Model-Driven Engineering Tool for Blockchain-Based Business Process Execution and Asset Management.

    An Binh Tran;Qinghua Lu;Ingo Weber

  • Blockchains for Business Process Management - Challenges and Opportunities

    Jan Mendling;Ingo Weber;Wil van der Aalst;Jan vom Brocke

  • Blockchains for Business Process Management - Challenges and Opportunities.

    Jan Mendling;Ingo Weber

Frequent Co-Authors

Liming Zhu
Liming Zhu Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Jan Mendling
Jan Mendling Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Jörg Hoffmann
Jörg Hoffmann Saarland University
Len Bass
Len Bass Carnegie Mellon University
Marlon Dumas
Marlon Dumas University of Tartu
Claudio Di Ciccio
Claudio Di Ciccio Utrecht University
Boualem Benatallah
Boualem Benatallah Dublin City University
Mathias Weske
Mathias Weske Hasso Plattner Institute
Guido Governatori
Guido Governatori Central Queensland University
Xiwei Xu
Xiwei Xu Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a Computer Science degree opens doors across various industries. Many students combine their technical skills with other growing fields through online education.

If you’re interested in law and public service, a criminal justice major can give you insight into cybersecurity, digital forensics, and ethical hacking. Likewise, understanding business operations can be enhanced by pursuing an accounting degree, helping graduates specialize in financial technology or data auditing roles.

Those seeking leadership in emerging technologies can advance with the best data science masters programs online. This pathway builds advanced analytical and AI skills, aligning well with careers in big data, machine learning, and automation.

Moreover, if you’re interested in technology’s role in the built environment, a 2 year construction management degree online allows for combining project management, digital tools, and engineering basics.

These related degrees and career pathways empower students to customize their studies for diverse roles—from IT security and digital marketing to data analysis and project management—making the most of your computer science foundation.

Best Scientists Citing Ingo Weber

Trending Scientists