World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
Estonia
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
95
Citations
43298
World Ranking
456
National Ranking
1

Marlon Dumas publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marlon Dumas sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 478 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Marlon Dumas D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marlon Dumas sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 95 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Estonia Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Estonia Leader Award

Overview

Marlon Dumas is affiliated with the University of Tartu in Estonia. Their research primarily centers on topics within Business Process Modeling and Analysis, with additional focus on Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services, Data Quality and Management, Simulation Techniques and Applications, Big Data and Business Intelligence, Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms, and Robotic Process Automation Applications.

The scientist's main fields of study include Business, Management and Accounting, Computer Science, and Decision Sciences. More specifically, their work covers subfields such as Management Information Systems, Information Systems, Management Science and Operations Research, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, and Artificial Intelligence.

Frequent publication venues for Marlon Dumas comprise arXiv (Cornell University), Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Information Systems, PeerJ Computer Science, and Business & Information Systems Engineering.

Several recent papers authored or coauthored by the scientist are:

  • "The biggest business process management problems to solve before we die" (2023) published in Computers in Industry
  • "Automated discovery of business process simulation models from event logs" (2020) published in Decision Support Systems
  • "Robotic Process Mining: Vision and Challenges" (2020) published in Business & Information Systems Engineering
  • "AI-augmented Business Process Management Systems: A Research Manifesto" (2023) published in ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems
  • "Opportunities and Challenges for Process Mining in Organizations: Results of a Delphi Study" (2021) published in Business & Information Systems Engineering

Marlon Dumas has collaborated frequently with coauthors including David Chapela-Campa, Marcello La Rosa, Fredrik Milani, Artem Polyvyanyy, and Gamal Elkoumy.

The scientist has published books with Springer Science+Business Media, including:

  • "Business Process Management" (2020)
  • "Business Process Management Forum" (2020)
  • "Advances in Databases and Information Systems" (2021)

Best Publications

  • QoS-aware middleware for Web services composition

    Liangzhao Zeng;B. Benatallah;A.H.H. Ngu;M. Dumas

  • Fundamentals of Business Process Management

    Marlon Dumas;Marcello La Rosa;Jan Mendling;Hajo A. Reijers

  • Semantics and analysis of business process models in BPMN

    Remco M. Dijkman;Marlon Dumas;Chun Ouyang

  • Quality driven web services composition

    Liangzhao Zeng;Boualem Benatallah;Marlon Dumas;Jayant Kalagnanam

  • Process Mining Manifesto

    Wil van der Aalst;Wil van der Aalst;Arya Adriansyah;Ana Karla Alves de Medeiros;Franco Arcieri

  • Process Aware Information Systems: Bridging People and Software Through Process Technology

    Marlon Dumas;Wil M. van der Aalst;Arthur H. ter Hofstede

  • Similarity of business process models: Metrics and evaluation

    Remco Dijkman;Marlon Dumas;Boudewijn van Dongen;Reina Käärik

  • The Self-Serv environment for Web services composition

    B. Benatallah;Q.Z. Sheng;M. Dumas

  • Blockchains for Business Process Management - Challenges and Opportunities

    Jan Mendling;Ingo Weber;Wil Van Der Aalst;Jan Vom Brocke

  • Declarative composition and peer-to-peer provisioning of dynamic Web services

    B. Benatallah;M. Dumas;Q.Z. Sheng;A.H.H. Ngu

  • Formal semantics and analysis of control flow in WS-BPEL

    Chun Ouyang;Eric Verbeek;Wil M. P. van der Aalst;Stephan Breutel

  • UML Activity Diagrams as a Workflow Specification Language

    Marlon Dumas;Arthur H. M. ter Hofstede

  • On the suitability of BPMN for business process modelling

    P. Wohed;W. M. P. van der Aalst;M. Dumas;A. H. M. ter Hofstede

  • Predictive Business Process Monitoring with LSTM Neural Networks

    Niek Tax;Ilya Verenich;Marcello La Rosa;Marlon Dumas

  • Service interaction patterns

    Alistair Barros;Marlon Dumas;Arthur H. M. ter Hofstede

  • Graph Matching Algorithms for Business Process Model Similarity Search

    Remco Dijkman;Marlon Dumas;Luciano García-Bañuelos

  • Analysis of Web Services Composition Languages: The Case of BPEL4WS

    Petia Wohed;Wil M. P. van der Aalst;Wil M. P. van der Aalst;Marlon Dumas;Arthur H. M. ter Hofstede

  • Automated Discovery of Process Models from Event Logs: Review and Benchmark

    Adriano Augusto;Raffaele Conforti;Marlon Dumas;Marcello La Rosa

  • Design and Implementation of the YAWL System

    Wil M.P. van der Aalst;Wil M.P. van der Aalst;Lachlan J. Aldred;Marlon Dumas;Arthur H.M. ter Hofstede

  • Outcome-Oriented Predictive Process Monitoring: Review and Benchmark

    Irene Teinemaa;Marlon Dumas;Marcello La Rosa;Fabrizio Maria Maggi

  • Formal semantics and analysis of control flow in WS-BPEL

    C. Ouyang;W.M.P. van der Aalst;S. Breutel;M. Dumas

  • Service interaction patterns : towards a reference framework for service-based business process interconnection

    Alistair P. Barros;Marlon Dumas;Arthur H.M. ter Hofstede

  • Blockchains for Business Process Management - Challenges and Opportunities

    Jan Mendling;Ingo Weber;Wil van der Aalst;Jan vom Brocke

Frequent Co-Authors

Marcello La Rosa
Marcello La Rosa University of Melbourne
Arthur H. M. ter Hofstede
Arthur H. M. ter Hofstede Queensland University of Technology
Fabrizio Maria Maggi
Fabrizio Maria Maggi Free University of Bozen-Bolzano
Wil M. P. van der Aalst
Wil M. P. van der Aalst RWTH Aachen University
Jan Mendling
Jan Mendling Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Remco Dijkman
Remco Dijkman Eindhoven University of Technology
Ingo Weber
Ingo Weber Technical University of Berlin
Boualem Benatallah
Boualem Benatallah Dublin City University
Alistair Barros
Alistair Barros Queensland University of Technology
Artem Polyvyanyy
Artem Polyvyanyy University of Melbourne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Computer Science opens up several flexible and affordable options for students. Those looking for a faster route to career advancement may consider the quickest masters degree online programs, which allow students to earn their qualifications in a shorter time without compromising on quality.

When selecting a program, it’s important to look at current job market trends. Understanding which master's degree is most in demand in USA can help you align your studies with high-growth career opportunities in technology and related fields.

For those just starting their academic journey, online associates degrees offer a practical entry point. These programs can pave the way for entry-level IT roles or serve as a stepping stone toward a bachelor’s or master’s degree.

Cost is also a crucial factor to consider. Many reputable institutions offer affordable online courses, making it possible to gain a quality education without incurring significant debt.

Best Scientists Citing Marlon Dumas

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles