World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
56
Citations
9048
World Ranking
751
National Ranking
40

Xiaojun Chen publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Xiaojun Chen sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 189 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Xiaojun Chen D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Xiaojun Chen sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Overview

Xiaojun Chen is affiliated with the Hong Kong Polytechnic University in China. Their research spans multiple disciplines including Mathematics, Computer Science, and Engineering, with a strong focus on areas such as Computational Mechanics, Artificial Intelligence, and Numerical Analysis.

Their scholarly output reflects a concentration on topics including Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques, Advanced Optimization Algorithms Research, and Optimization and Variational Analysis. Other notable topics include Risk and Portfolio Optimization, Matrix Theory and Algorithms, Numerical Methods in Inverse Problems, and Image and Signal Denoising Methods.

Frequent coauthors in their research collaborations include Jie Jiang, Leilei Liu, Sirui Yu, Jieheng Zeng, and Chao Li.

The most common publication venues where Xiaojun Chen has contributed are:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • SIAM Journal on Optimization
  • SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing
  • Mathematical Programming
  • SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis

Recent research papers authored or coauthored by Xiaojun Chen include:

  • "Dietary Patterns and Cognitive Health in Older Adults: Findings from the Sydney Memory and Ageing Study," 2020, published in The Journal of Nutrition Health & Aging
  • "A Smoothing Proximal Gradient Algorithm for Nonsmooth Convex Regression with Cardinality Penalty," 2020, published in SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis
  • "Anderson Acceleration for a Class of Nonsmooth Fixed-Point Problems," 2021, published in SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing
  • "Choroid Segmentation of Retinal OCT Images Based on CNN Classifier and l₂-lq Fitter," 2021, published in Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine
  • "Is it real or illusory? An empirical examination of the impact of open government data on innovation capability in the case of China," 2023, published in Technology in Society

Best Publications

  • Lower Bound Theory of Nonzero Entries in Solutions of $ll_2$-$ll_p$ Minimization

    Xiaojun Chen;Fengmin Xu;Yinyu Ye

  • Global and superlinear convergence of the smoothing Newton method and its application to general box constrained variational inequalities

    X. Chen;L. Qi;D. Sun

  • Smoothing methods for nonsmooth, nonconvex minimization

    Xiaojun Chen

  • Smoothing Methods and Semismooth Methods for Nondifferentiable Operator Equations

    Xiaojun Chen;Zuhair Nashed;Liqun Qi

  • A penalized Fischer-Burmeister NCP-function

    Bintong Chen;Xiaojun Chen;Christian Kanzow

  • Expected Residual Minimization Method for Stochastic Linear Complementarity Problems

    Xiaojun Chen;Masao Fukushima

  • Convergence of Newton-like methods for singular operator equations using outer inverses

    M. Z. Nashed;X. Chen

  • Computation of Error Bounds for P-matrix Linear Complementarity Problems

    Xiaojun Chen;Shuhuang Xiang

  • A proximal difference-of-convex algorithm with extrapolation

    Bo Wen;Bo Wen;Bo Wen;Xiaojun Chen;Ting Kei Pong

  • Complexity of unconstrained L_2-L_p minimization

    Xiaojun Chen;Dongdong Ge;Zizhuo Wang;Yinyu Ye

  • Robust solution of monotone stochastic linear complementarity problems

    Xiaojun Chen;Chao Zhang;Masao Fukushima

  • Convergence domains of certain iterative methods for solving nonlinear equations

    Xiaojun Chen;Tetsuro Yamamoto

  • Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers for a Class of Nonconvex and Nonsmooth Problems with Applications to Background/Foreground Extraction

    Lei Yang;Ting Kei Pong;Xiaojun Chen

  • On Homotopy-Smoothing Methods for Box-Constrained Variational Inequalities

    Xiaojun Chen;Yinyu Ye

  • A Global and Local Superlinear Continuation-Smoothing Method for P 0 and R 0 NCP or Monotone NCP

    Bintong Chen;Xiaojun Chen

  • Smoothing Nonlinear Conjugate Gradient Method for Image Restoration Using Nonsmooth Nonconvex Minimization

    Xiaojun Chen;Weijun Zhou

  • Non-Lipschitz $ll_{p}$ -Regularization and Box Constrained Model for Image Restoration

    Xiaojun Chen;M. K. Ng;Chao Zhang

  • STOCHASTIC VARIATIONAL INEQUALITIES: RESIDUAL MINIMIZATION SMOOTHING SAMPLE AVERAGE APPROXIMATIONS

    Xiaojun Chen;Roger J.-B. Wets;Yanfang Zhang

  • Optimality conditions and a smoothing trust region newton method for nonlipschitz optimization

    Xiaojun Chen;Lingfeng Niu;Yaxiang Yuan

  • Differential variational inequality approach to dynamic games with shared constraints

    Xiaojun Chen;Zhengyu Wang

  • Stochastic $R_0$ Matrix Linear Complementarity Problems

    Haitao Fang;Xiaojun Chen;Masao Fukushima

Frequent Co-Authors

Liqun Qi
Liqun Qi Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Robert S. Womersley
Robert S. Womersley University of New South Wales
Masao Fukushima
Masao Fukushima Kyoto University
Yinyu Ye
Yinyu Ye Stanford University
Carl Tim Kelley
Carl Tim Kelley North Carolina State University
Yong Shi
Yong Shi Chinese Academy of Sciences
Jane J. Ye
Jane J. Ye University of Victoria
Ian H. Sloan
Ian H. Sloan University of New South Wales
Yingjie Tian
Yingjie Tian University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
Roger J.-B. Wets
Roger J.-B. Wets University of California, Davis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students studying Mathematics in the USA, expanding their expertise through complementary online degrees can open diverse career pathways. Many consider pursuing an MBA to enhance leadership and business skills. Those exploring this option often look for the easiest mba to get into, which balances accessibility with quality education.

Online learning offers flexibility, making programs like the easiest online mba attractive for working professionals or those seeking a smoother transition from undergraduate studies. For advanced leadership roles, the 1 year dba program online delivers a focused curriculum that can be completed quickly, ideal for math graduates aiming to fast-track their business acumen.

Additionally, careers in finance are a natural fit for mathematics graduates. The best online masters in finance programs combine quantitative skills with financial theory, preparing students for roles in investment banking, financial analysis, or risk management.

Choosing the right online degree depends on individual career goals, time commitment, and financial considerations. Exploring these pathways can significantly expand opportunities beyond traditional mathematics roles.

Best Scientists Citing Xiaojun Chen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles