World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mathematics 56 751 644 40 39 189 9048

Xiaojun Chen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Xiaojun Chen between 1988 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Xiaojun Chen published across 38 years, from 1988 to 2025, averaging 6.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2022. 30 of the 264 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2022. 1988: 2 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 2 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 22 publications 2023: 18 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 18 publications
1988 2025

264 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Xiaojun Chen: publications per year, 1988 to 2025
Year Publications
1988 2
1989 2
1990 3
1991 1
1992 2
1993 2
1994 2
1995 5
1996 4
1997 5
1998 5
1999 5
2000 9
2001 5
2002 3
2003 6
2004 3
2005 4
2006 5
2007 4
2008 9
2009 5
2010 6
2011 12
2012 9
2013 5
2014 9
2015 8
2016 5
2017 11
2018 10
2019 7
2020 9
2021 12
2022 22
2023 18
2024 12
2025 18
Total 264
Download as CSV

Xiaojun Chen publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Xiaojun Chen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 42–46 to 537+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 112. Most scientists, 112, have 142–146 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 187–191 publications, is where this scientist sits. 42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientist 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientist 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientist 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42–46 publications 537+

This scientist: 189 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mathematics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,584 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
42–46 3
47–51 5
52–56 7
57–61 20
62–66 14
67–71 25
72–76 19
77–81 35
82–86 50
87–91 60
92–96 86
97–101 84
102–106 83
107–111 90
112–116 99
117–121 90
122–126 91
127–131 109
132–136 110
137–141 98
142–146 112
147–151 102
152–156 88
157–161 106
162–166 83
167–171 102
172–176 77
177–181 81
182–186 78
187–191 71 189
192–196 92
197–201 64
202–206 69
207–211 64
212–216 62
217–221 58
222–226 53
227–231 50
232–236 46
237–241 46
242–246 46
247–251 43
252–256 29
257–261 45
262–266 30
267–271 33
272–276 34
277–281 30
282–286 31
287–291 21
292–296 34
297–301 26
302–306 10
307–311 17
312–316 23
317–321 13
322–326 16
327–331 26
332–336 13
337–341 13
342–346 16
347–351 17
352–356 12
357–361 18
362–366 18
367–371 9
372–376 11
377–381 8
382–386 8
387–391 9
392–396 9
397–401 8
402–406 11
407–411 6
412–416 6
417–421 9
422–426 8
427–431 5
432–436 8
437–441 8
442–446 4
447–451 4
452–456 4
457–461 2
462–466 2
467–471 4
472–476 3
477–481 3
482–486 6
487–491 3
492–496 5
497–501 5
502–506 1
507–511 6
512–516 4
517–521 1
522–526 3
527–531 1
532–536 4
537+ 100
Download as CSV

Xiaojun Chen D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Xiaojun Chen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 57 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 86+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 174. Most scientists, 174, have 30 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mathematics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,584 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 174
31 151
32 174
33 117
34 136
35 127
36 145
37 153
38 150
39 150
40 138
41 136
42 93
43 108
44 115
45 112
46 103
47 75
48 59
49 67
50 60
51 57
52 59
53 62
54 60
55 50
56 42 56
57 54
58 50
59 42
60 41
61 35
62 40
63 21
64 31
65 27
66 29
67 19
68 25
69 17
70 18
71 12
72 14
73 13
74 18
75 9
76 11
77 10
78 9
79 16
80 12
81 10
82 5
83 5
84 13
85 6
86+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Xiaojun Chen is affiliated with the Hong Kong Polytechnic University in China. Their research spans multiple disciplines including Mathematics, Computer Science, and Engineering, with a strong focus on areas such as Computational Mechanics, Artificial Intelligence, and Numerical Analysis.

Their scholarly output reflects a concentration on topics including Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques, Advanced Optimization Algorithms Research, and Optimization and Variational Analysis. Other notable topics include Risk and Portfolio Optimization, Matrix Theory and Algorithms, Numerical Methods in Inverse Problems, and Image and Signal Denoising Methods.

Frequent coauthors in their research collaborations include Jie Jiang, Leilei Liu, Sirui Yu, Jieheng Zeng, and Chao Li.

The most common publication venues where Xiaojun Chen has contributed are:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • SIAM Journal on Optimization
  • SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing
  • Mathematical Programming
  • SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis

Recent research papers authored or coauthored by Xiaojun Chen include:

  • "Dietary Patterns and Cognitive Health in Older Adults: Findings from the Sydney Memory and Ageing Study," 2020, published in The Journal of Nutrition Health & Aging
  • "A Smoothing Proximal Gradient Algorithm for Nonsmooth Convex Regression with Cardinality Penalty," 2020, published in SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis
  • "Anderson Acceleration for a Class of Nonsmooth Fixed-Point Problems," 2021, published in SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing
  • "Choroid Segmentation of Retinal OCT Images Based on CNN Classifier and l₂-lq Fitter," 2021, published in Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine
  • "Is it real or illusory? An empirical examination of the impact of open government data on innovation capability in the case of China," 2023, published in Technology in Society

Best Publications

  • Lower Bound Theory of Nonzero Entries in Solutions of $ll_2$-$ll_p$ Minimization

    Xiaojun Chen;Fengmin Xu;Yinyu Ye

  • Global and superlinear convergence of the smoothing Newton method and its application to general box constrained variational inequalities

    X. Chen;L. Qi;D. Sun

  • Smoothing methods for nonsmooth, nonconvex minimization

    Xiaojun Chen

  • Smoothing Methods and Semismooth Methods for Nondifferentiable Operator Equations

    Xiaojun Chen;Zuhair Nashed;Liqun Qi

  • A penalized Fischer-Burmeister NCP-function

    Bintong Chen;Xiaojun Chen;Christian Kanzow

  • Expected Residual Minimization Method for Stochastic Linear Complementarity Problems

    Xiaojun Chen;Masao Fukushima

  • Convergence of Newton-like methods for singular operator equations using outer inverses

    M. Z. Nashed;X. Chen

  • Computation of Error Bounds for P-matrix Linear Complementarity Problems

    Xiaojun Chen;Shuhuang Xiang

  • A proximal difference-of-convex algorithm with extrapolation

    Bo Wen;Bo Wen;Bo Wen;Xiaojun Chen;Ting Kei Pong

  • Complexity of unconstrained L_2-L_p minimization

    Xiaojun Chen;Dongdong Ge;Zizhuo Wang;Yinyu Ye

  • Robust solution of monotone stochastic linear complementarity problems

    Xiaojun Chen;Chao Zhang;Masao Fukushima

  • Convergence domains of certain iterative methods for solving nonlinear equations

    Xiaojun Chen;Tetsuro Yamamoto

  • Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers for a Class of Nonconvex and Nonsmooth Problems with Applications to Background/Foreground Extraction

    Lei Yang;Ting Kei Pong;Xiaojun Chen

  • On Homotopy-Smoothing Methods for Box-Constrained Variational Inequalities

    Xiaojun Chen;Yinyu Ye

  • A Global and Local Superlinear Continuation-Smoothing Method for P 0 and R 0 NCP or Monotone NCP

    Bintong Chen;Xiaojun Chen

  • Smoothing Nonlinear Conjugate Gradient Method for Image Restoration Using Nonsmooth Nonconvex Minimization

    Xiaojun Chen;Weijun Zhou

  • Non-Lipschitz $ll_{p}$ -Regularization and Box Constrained Model for Image Restoration

    Xiaojun Chen;M. K. Ng;Chao Zhang

  • STOCHASTIC VARIATIONAL INEQUALITIES: RESIDUAL MINIMIZATION SMOOTHING SAMPLE AVERAGE APPROXIMATIONS

    Xiaojun Chen;Roger J.-B. Wets;Yanfang Zhang

  • Optimality conditions and a smoothing trust region newton method for nonlipschitz optimization

    Xiaojun Chen;Lingfeng Niu;Yaxiang Yuan

  • Differential variational inequality approach to dynamic games with shared constraints

    Xiaojun Chen;Zhengyu Wang

  • Stochastic $R_0$ Matrix Linear Complementarity Problems

    Haitao Fang;Xiaojun Chen;Masao Fukushima

Frequent Co-Authors

Liqun Qi
Liqun Qi Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Robert S. Womersley
Robert S. Womersley University of New South Wales
Masao Fukushima
Masao Fukushima Kyoto University
Yinyu Ye
Yinyu Ye Stanford University
Carl Tim Kelley
Carl Tim Kelley North Carolina State University
Yong Shi
Yong Shi Chinese Academy of Sciences
Jane J. Ye
Jane J. Ye University of Victoria
Ian H. Sloan
Ian H. Sloan University of New South Wales
Yingjie Tian
Yingjie Tian University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
Roger J.-B. Wets
Roger J.-B. Wets University of California, Davis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students studying Mathematics in the USA, expanding their expertise through complementary online degrees can open diverse career pathways. Many consider pursuing an MBA to enhance leadership and business skills. Those exploring this option often look for the easiest mba to get into, which balances accessibility with quality education.

Online learning offers flexibility, making programs like the easiest online mba attractive for working professionals or those seeking a smoother transition from undergraduate studies. For advanced leadership roles, the 1 year dba program online delivers a focused curriculum that can be completed quickly, ideal for math graduates aiming to fast-track their business acumen.

Additionally, careers in finance are a natural fit for mathematics graduates. The best online masters in finance programs combine quantitative skills with financial theory, preparing students for roles in investment banking, financial analysis, or risk management.

Choosing the right online degree depends on individual career goals, time commitment, and financial considerations. Exploring these pathways can significantly expand opportunities beyond traditional mathematics roles.

Best Scientists Citing Xiaojun Chen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles