World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
32
Citations
9900
World Ranking
12862
National Ranking
387

Alistair Barros publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alistair Barros sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 144 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Alistair Barros D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alistair Barros sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Alistair Barros is affiliated with the Queensland University of Technology in Australia and has contributed extensively to the field of computer science. Their research spans several subfields including computer networks and communications, information systems, artificial intelligence, management information systems, and electrical and electronic engineering.

The scientist has explored a range of topics with a focus on technologies and methodologies relevant to modern computing systems. These topics include:

  • IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Cloud Computing and Resource Management
  • Software System Performance and Reliability
  • Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services
  • Business Process Modeling and Analysis
  • COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
  • Blockchain Technology Applications and Security

Alistair Barros's research outputs appear in multiple publication venues, among the most frequent being:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE Access
  • Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
  • Information
  • Applied Sciences

Their recent notable publications include:

  • LungNet: A hybrid deep-CNN model for lung cancer diagnosis using CT and wearable sensor-based medical IoT data (2021, Computers in Biology and Medicine)
  • An approach for selecting and using a method of inter-coder reliability in information management research (2020, International Journal of Information Management)
  • A Review on VANET Research: Perspective of Recent Emerging Technologies (2022, IEEE Access)
  • A Review of Emerging Technologies for IoT-Based Smart Cities (2022, Sensors)
  • A Privacy-Preserving Mobile and Fog Computing Framework to Trace and Prevent COVID-19 Community Transmission (2020, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics)

Alistair Barros frequently collaborates with several co-authors, including:

  • Md Whaiduzzaman
  • Colin Fidge
  • Md. Julkar Nayeen Mahi
  • Rajkumar Buyya
  • Shanto Roy

The scientist has authored 83 publications within the main field of computer science. Their work notably intersects applied computing disciplines, often addressing practical challenges in networked, distributed, and IoT-enabled systems. The diverse portfolio reflects engagement with both theoretical concepts and real-world applications, including AI methods for healthcare diagnostics and privacy-preserving computing frameworks.

Best Publications

  • Workflow Patterns

    W. M. P. Van Der Aalst;A. H. M. Ter Hofstede;B. Kiepuszewski;A. P. Barros

  • Service interaction patterns

    Alistair Barros;Marlon Dumas;Arthur H. M. ter Hofstede

  • Advanced Workflow Patterns

    Wil M. P. van der Aalst;Alistair P. Barros;Arthur H. M. ter Hofstede;Bartek Kiepuszewski

  • The rise of web service ecosystems

    Alistair P. Barros;Marlon Dumas

  • Towards a unified service description language for the internet of services : requirements and first developments

    Jorge Cardoso;Alistair P. Barros;Norman May;Uwe Kylau

  • Let's dance: a language for service behavior modeling

    Johannes Maria Zaha;Alistair Barros;Marlon Dumas;Arthur ter Hofstede

  • Standards for Web Service Choreography and Orchestration: Status and Perspectives

    Alistair P. Barros;Marlon Dumas;Phillipa J. Oaks

  • LungNet: A hybrid deep-CNN model for lung cancer diagnosis using CT and wearable sensor-based medical IoT data

    Nuruzzaman Faruqui;Mohammad Abu Yousuf;Whaiduzzaman;Whaiduzzaman;A.K.M. Azad

  • Service delivery framework

    Alistair Barros

  • Service Interaction Modeling: Bridging Global and Local Views

    J.M. Zaha;M. Dumas;A. ter Hofstede;A. Barros

  • Interaction modeling using BPMN

    Gero Decker;Alistair Barros

  • Service interaction patterns : towards a reference framework for service-based business process interconnection

    Alistair P. Barros;Marlon Dumas;Arthur H.M. ter Hofstede

  • An Introduction to Service Choreographies (Servicechoreographien – eine Einführung)

    Gero Decker;Oliver Kopp;Alistair P. Barros

  • Correlation patterns in service-oriented architectures

    Alistair Barros;Gero Decker;Marlon Dumas;Franz Weber

  • Handbook of Service Description

    Alistair Barros;Daniel Oberle

  • Process querying: Enabling business intelligence through query-based process analytics

    Artem Polyvyanyy;Chun Ouyang;Alistair Barros;Wil M.P. van der Aalst;Wil M.P. van der Aalst

  • An approach for selecting and using a method of inter-coder reliability in information management research

    Alireza Nili;Mary Tate;Alistair Barros;David Johnstone

  • A unified description language for human to automated services

    Daniel Oberle;Alistair Barros;Uwe Kylau;Steffen Heinzl

  • Migrating Enterprise Legacy Source Code to Microservices: On Multitenancy, Statefulness, and Data Consistency

    Andrei Furda;Colin Fidge;Olaf Zimmermann;Wayne Kelly

  • An Introduction to Service Choreographies

    Gero Decker;Oliver Kopp;Alistair Barros

  • Let's Dance: A Language for Service Behavior Modeling

    Alistair Barros;Marlon Dumas Menjivar;Arthur ter Hofstede;Johannes Zaha

  • Service Interaction Modeling: Bridging Global and Local Views

    Johannes Maria Zaha;Marlon Dumas;Arthur H.M. ter Hofstede;Alistair P. Barros

Frequent Co-Authors

Arthur H. M. ter Hofstede
Arthur H. M. ter Hofstede Queensland University of Technology
Marlon Dumas
Marlon Dumas University of Tartu
Artem Polyvyanyy
Artem Polyvyanyy University of Melbourne
Wil M. P. van der Aalst
Wil M. P. van der Aalst RWTH Aachen University
Henderik A. Proper
Henderik A. Proper Association for Computing Machinery
Ingo Weber
Ingo Weber Technical University of Berlin
Rajkumar Buyya
Rajkumar Buyya University of Melbourne
Avigdor Gal
Avigdor Gal Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Marcello La Rosa
Marcello La Rosa University of Melbourne
Michael Adams
Michael Adams University of Birmingham

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens many more opportunities in related STEM fields. If you’re interested in expanding your skills beyond traditional computer science, there are a range of flexible online programs to consider.

For those drawn to building and designing machines, an online degree in mechanical engineering offers a technical pathway with strong job prospects. Similarly, students interested in the fundamentals of matter and energy may pursue online physics degrees for advanced scientific roles.

Tech-driven industries also value proficiency in data analysis. The data science learning path equips students with in-demand skills for careers in business analytics, AI, and research. Alternatively, a technical edge can come from earning an online bachelor’s in electrical engineering, which focuses on modern electronics and systems.

Each of these online degree options is designed for flexibility, affordability, and career advancement, allowing students to explore high-growth fields from anywhere in the world.

Best Scientists Citing Alistair Barros

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles