World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
46
Citations
10079
World Ranking
6777
National Ranking
12

Jorge Cardoso publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jorge Cardoso sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 247 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Jorge Cardoso D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jorge Cardoso sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2009 - ACM Senior Member

Overview

Jorge Cardoso is affiliated with the University of Coimbra in Portugal and focuses primarily on computer science research. Their work spans multiple subfields including computer networks and communications, information systems, artificial intelligence, management science and operations research, and software.

The scientist's research topics cover various aspects of software and systems engineering. Key areas include software system performance and reliability, software engineering research and techniques, anomaly detection techniques and applications, cloud computing and resource management, network security and intrusion detection, and software reliability and analysis research.

Jorge Cardoso has contributed to academic literature through several papers. Notable recent publications include:

  • Automated Analysis of Distributed Tracing: Challenges and Research Directions (2021), published in Journal of Grid Computing
  • LogRule: Efficient Structured Log Mining for Root Cause Analysis (2023), published in IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management
  • Improving Observability in Event Sourcing Systems (2021), published in Journal of Systems and Software
  • Impacte do acidente de trabalho grave na vida do trabalhador (2020), published in Universidade Nova de Lisboa's Repository
  • Artificial Intelligence for IT Operations (AIOPS) Workshop White Paper (2021), published in arXiv (Cornell University)

Frequent co-authors in Jorge Cardoso's research include Jasmin Bogatinovski, Odej Kao, Sasho Nedelkoski, Michael Gerndt, and Fernando Brito e Abreu. The scientist's publications often appear in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), Journal of Grid Computing, IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, Universidade Nova de Lisboa's Repository, and Journal of Systems and Software.

Jorge Cardoso holds the distinction of ACM Senior Member since 2009, reflecting involvement within professional computing organizations.

Best Publications

  • Quality of Service for Workflows and Web Service Processes

    Jorge Cardoso;Amit P. Sheth;John A. Miller;Jonathan Arnold

  • Semantic E-Workflow Composition

    Jorge Cardoso;Amit Sheth

  • What makes process models understandable

    Jan Mendling;Hajo A. Reijers;Jorge Cardoso

  • The Semantic Web Vision: Where Are We?

    J. Cardoso

  • A discourse on complexity of process models

    J. Cardoso;J. Mendling;G. Neumann;H. A. Reijers

  • The Semantic Web and Its Applications

    Jorge S. Cardoso;Amit P. Sheth

  • Semantic Web Services and Web Process Composition

    Jorge Cardoso;Amit P. Sheth

  • Modeling Quality of Service for Workflows and Web Service Processes

    Jorge Cardoso;John A. Miller;Amit P. Sheth;Jonathan Arnold

  • Quality metrics for business process models

    Itp Irene Vanderfeesten;J Cardoso;J Mendling;HA Hajo Reijers

  • Towards a unified service description language for the internet of services : requirements and first developments

    Jorge Cardoso;Alistair P. Barros;Norman May;Uwe Kylau

  • Semantic Web Services: Theory, Tools and Applications

    Jorge Cardoso

  • Service Engineering for the Internet of Services

    Jorge S. Cardoso;Konrad Voigt;Matthias Winkler

  • Semantic Web Services Processes And Applications

    Jorge Cardoso;Amit P. Sheth

  • On a Quest for Good Process Models: The Cross-Connectivity Metric

    Irene Vanderfeesten;Hajo A. Reijers;Jan Mendling;Wil M. Aalst

  • Workflow Quality of Service

    Jorge Cardoso;Amit P. Sheth;John Miller

  • Workflow Management Systems and ERP Systems: Differences, Commonalities, and Applications

    Jorge Cardoso;Robert P. Bostrom;Amit Sheth

  • Process control-flow complexity metric: An empirical validation

    Jorge Cardoso

  • Healthcare Enterprise Process Development and Integration

    Kemafor Anyanwu;Amit Sheth;Jorge Cardoso;John Miller

  • How to Measure the Control-flow Complexity of Web Processes and Workflows

    Jorge Cardoso

  • Self-Attentive Classification-Based Anomaly Detection in Unstructured Logs

    Sasho Nedelkoski;Jasmin Bogatinovski;Alexander Acker;Jorge Cardoso

  • OWL: Web Ontology Language

    Adélia Gouveia;Jorge Cardoso

Frequent Co-Authors

Amit P. Sheth
Amit P. Sheth University of South Carolina
John A. Miller
John A. Miller University of Georgia
Geert Poels
Geert Poels Ghent University
Jan Mendling
Jan Mendling Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Wil M. P. van der Aalst
Wil M. P. van der Aalst RWTH Aachen University
Marten van Sinderen
Marten van Sinderen University of Twente
Jasbir S. Arora
Jasbir S. Arora University of Iowa
Miltiadis D. Lytras
Miltiadis D. Lytras American College of Greece
Manfred Hauswirth
Manfred Hauswirth Technical University of Berlin
Hervé Panetto
Hervé Panetto University of Lorraine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you explore studying Computer Science in the USA, it's important to consider related degrees and career paths that can boost your options. Many students opt for top online electrical engineering schools to expand into fields like robotics, embedded systems, or hardware development.

If you want a quicker route to a high-paying job, look into certificate programs that pay well. These short-term programs can lead to roles in IT support, cybersecurity, or network administration—complementing your computer science background.

For advanced learners seeking flexibility, quickest online masters degree programs enable you to earn a respected graduate credential in just 12 to 18 months. This can accelerate your career progression, preparing you for specialized or leadership roles in tech.

Finally, choosing one of the most useful graduate degrees—such as artificial intelligence, data science, or software engineering—ensures long-term demand for your skills across industries.

Best Scientists Citing Jorge Cardoso

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles