World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
Germany
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
93
Citations
32798
World Ranking
521
National Ranking
24

Jan Mendling publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Mendling sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 250 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 560 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 424 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 378 scientists 262–271 publications: 300 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 565 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Jan Mendling D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Mendling sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 984 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 969 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 765 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 517 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 93 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Germany Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Computer Science in Germany Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Germany Leader Award

Overview

Jan Mendling is affiliated with Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin in Germany. Their research primarily spans the fields of Business, Management and Accounting as well as Computer Science. Within these broader domains, Mendling has contributed notably to subfields including Management Information Systems, Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, Management Science and Operations Research, and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering.

Their work focuses on key topics such as Business Process Modeling and Analysis, Big Data and Business Intelligence, Semantic Web and Ontologies, Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services, Data Quality and Management, Software Engineering Research, and Information Technology Governance and Strategy.

Recent publications by Mendling include:

  • Building a complementary agenda for business process management and digital innovation, 2020, European Journal of Information Systems

Mendling often collaborates with a set of frequent co-authors, including Thomas Grisold, Jan vom Brocke, Bastian Wurm, Saimir Bala, and Maxim Vidgof.

The researcher's work has appeared in various publication venues, with multiple contributions to:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Business & Information Systems Engineering
  • Information Systems
  • Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
  • Business Process Management Journal

In addition to journal articles, Mendling has contributed to book publications as well. For example, the volume Service-Oriented Computing - ICSOC 2020 Workshops was published by Springer Science+Business Media in 2021.

Best Publications

  • Fundamentals of Business Process Management

    Marlon Dumas;Marcello La Rosa;Jan Mendling;Hajo A. Reijers

  • Process Mining Manifesto

    Wil van der Aalst;Wil van der Aalst;Arya Adriansyah;Ana Karla Alves de Medeiros;Franco Arcieri

  • Seven process modeling guidelines (7PMG)

    J. Mendling;H. A. Reijers;W. M. P. van der Aalst

  • Similarity of business process models: Metrics and evaluation

    Remco Dijkman;Marlon Dumas;Boudewijn van Dongen;Reina Käärik

  • Blockchains for Business Process Management - Challenges and Opportunities

    Jan Mendling;Ingo Weber;Wil Van Der Aalst;Jan Vom Brocke

  • Measuring Similarity between Business Process Models

    Boudewijn Dongen;Remco Dijkman;Jan Mendling

  • Untrusted business process monitoring and execution using blockchain

    Ingo Weber;Ingo Weber;Xiwei Xu;Xiwei Xu;Régis Riveret;Guido Governatori

  • What makes process models understandable

    Jan Mendling;Hajo A. Reijers;Jorge Cardoso

  • A Study Into the Factors That Influence the Understandability of Business Process Models

    H A Reijers;J Mendling

  • Activity labeling in process modeling: Empirical insights and recommendations

    J. Mendling;H. A. Reijers;J. Recker

  • A discourse on complexity of process models

    J. Cardoso;J. Mendling;G. Neumann;H. A. Reijers

  • Conceptualizing smart service systems

    Daniel Beverungen;Oliver Müller;Martin Matzner;Jan Mendling

  • Metrics for Process Models: Empirical Foundations of Verification, Error Prediction, and Guidelines for Correctness

    Jan Mendling

  • Survey paper: Refactoring large process model repositories

    Barbara Weber;Manfred Reichert;Jan Mendling;Hajo A. Reijers

  • Efficient Consistency Measurement Based on Behavioral Profiles of Process Models

    M Weidlich;J Mendling;M Weske

  • From business process models to process-oriented software systems

    Chun Ouyang;Marlon Dumas;Wil M. P. Van Der Aalst;Arthur H. M. Ter Hofstede

  • APROMORE : an advanced process model repository

    Marcello La Rosa;Hajo A. Reijers;Wil M.P. van der Aalst;Remco M. Dijkman

  • Configurable multi-perspective business process models

    Marcello La Rosa;Marlon Dumas;Arthur H. M. ter Hofstede;Jan Mendling

  • Process model generation from natural language text

    Fabian Friedrich;Jan Mendling;Frank Puhlmann

  • Detection and prediction of errors in EPCs of the SAP reference model

    J. Mendling;H. M. W. Verbeek;B. F. van Dongen;W. M. P. van der Aalst

  • Blockchains for Business Process Management - Challenges and Opportunities

    Jan Mendling;Ingo Weber;Wil van der Aalst;Jan vom Brocke

  • Seven Process Modeling Guidelines (7PMG)

    Jan Mendling;Hajo Reijers;Wil M. van der Aalst

  • Business Process Execution Language for Web Services.

    Jan Mendling

  • Blockchains for Business Process Management - Challenges and Opportunities.

    Jan Mendling;Ingo Weber

Frequent Co-Authors

Claudio Di Ciccio
Claudio Di Ciccio Utrecht University
Jan C. Recker
Jan C. Recker Universität Hamburg
Matthias Weidlich
Matthias Weidlich Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Mathias Weske
Mathias Weske Hasso Plattner Institute
Marlon Dumas
Marlon Dumas University of Tartu
Barbara Weber
Barbara Weber University of St. Gallen
Marcello La Rosa
Marcello La Rosa University of Melbourne
Wil M. P. van der Aalst
Wil M. P. van der Aalst RWTH Aachen University
Ingo Weber
Ingo Weber Technical University of Berlin
Remco Dijkman
Remco Dijkman Eindhoven University of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Expanding your education in computer science can open countless doors across diverse industries. Many students now consider advancing their qualifications with convenient, flexible online programs. Choosing from accredited online colleges is crucial for ensuring that your degree is recognized by employers and meets rigorous academic standards.

Specialized online pathways, such as a game design online masters, equip graduates with creative and technical skills needed for fast-growing sectors in entertainment and technology. If digital security interests you, a cyber security online degree cost is a key factor to research, with programs offering valuable training in protecting sensitive information for organizations of all sizes.

Computer science backgrounds are also highly applicable to project-oriented fields such as construction. For those seeking leadership roles, a masters in construction management combines technology, planning, and management education, fully accessible through online learning. Carefully exploring these online degree options ensures alignment with your career goals and budget.

Best Scientists Citing Jan Mendling

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles