World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Giuseppe Schillaci

Giuseppe Schillaci

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 81 16424 15446 649 620 419 33160

Giuseppe Schillaci publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Giuseppe Schillaci between 1963 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Giuseppe Schillaci published across 62 years, from 1963 to 2024, averaging 7.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 30 publications in 2008. 1 of the 438 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1963 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 30. Peak 30 publications in 2008. 1963: 1 publication 1964: 1 publication 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 4 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 1 publication 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 10 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 8 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 17 publications 2001: 19 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 13 publications 2004: 20 publications 2005: 14 publications 2006: 24 publications 2007: 26 publications 2008: 30 publications 2009: 23 publications 2010: 23 publications 2011: 18 publications 2012: 22 publications 2013: 26 publications 2014: 20 publications 2015: 23 publications 2016: 19 publications 2017: 18 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 1 publication 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication
1963 2024

438 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Giuseppe Schillaci: publications per year, 1963 to 2024
Year Publications
1963 1
1964 1
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 4
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 1
1979 1
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 4
1991 4
1992 2
1993 2
1994 4
1995 7
1996 10
1997 6
1998 8
1999 8
2000 17
2001 19
2002 8
2003 13
2004 20
2005 14
2006 24
2007 26
2008 30
2009 23
2010 23
2011 18
2012 22
2013 26
2014 20
2015 23
2016 19
2017 18
2018 6
2019 3
2020 1
2021 1
2022 0
2023 0
2024 1
Total 438
Download as CSV

Giuseppe Schillaci publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Giuseppe Schillaci sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 401–420 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 419 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918 419
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Giuseppe Schillaci D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Giuseppe Schillaci sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 80–81 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972 81
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Giuseppe Schillaci is affiliated with the University of Perugia in Italy. Their research is focused primarily within the field of Medicine, with particular contributions to subfields such as Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine as well as Surgery.

The main research topics explored by Giuseppe Schillaci include:

  • Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
  • Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
  • Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

Throughout their career, Giuseppe Schillaci has collaborated frequently with several peers, including:

  • Gianfranco Parati
  • Juan Eugenio Ochoa
  • Paolo Salvi

Their academic output includes contributions to three publications within the broader domain of Medicine. Within subfields, two publications relate specifically to Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, and one publication involves Surgical topics.

Best Publications

  • Circadian blood pressure changes and left ventricular hypertrophy in essential hypertension.

    P Verdecchia;G Schillaci;M Guerrieri;C Gatteschi

  • Ambulatory blood pressure. An independent predictor of prognosis in essential hypertension.

    Paolo Verdecchia;Carlo Porcellati;Giuseppe Schillaci;Claudia Borgioni

  • Expert consensus document on the measurement of aortic stiffness in daily practice using carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity.

    Luc M. Van Bortel;Stephane Laurent;Pierre Boutouyrie;Phil Chowienczyk

  • Prognostic significance of endothelial dysfunction in hypertensive patients.

    Francesco Perticone;Roberto Ceravolo;Arturo Pujia;Giorgio Ventura

  • Ambulatory Pulse Pressure A Potent Predictor of Total Cardiovascular Risk in Hypertension

    Paolo Verdecchia;Giuseppe Schillaci;Claudia Borgioni;Antonella Ciucci

  • Relation Between Serum Uric Acid and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease in Essential Hypertension: The PIUMA Study

    Paolo Verdecchia;Giuseppe Schillaci;GianPaolo Reboldi;Fausto Santeusanio

  • Prognostic significance of serial changes in left ventricular mass in essential hypertension.

    Paolo Verdecchia;Giuseppe Schillaci;Claudia Borgioni;Antonella Ciucci

  • A Call to Action and a Lifecourse Strategy to Address the Global Burden of Raised Blood Pressure on Current and Future Generations: The Lancet Commission on Hypertension

    Michael H. Olsen;Michael H. Olsen;Sonia Y. Angell;Samira Asma;Pierre Boutouyrie

  • Lack of association between blood pressure variability and left ventricular mass in essential hypertension.

    Giuseppe Schillaci;Paolo Verdecchia;Claudia Borgioni;Antonella Ciucci

  • The role of vascular biomarkers for primary and secondary prevention. A position paper from the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on peripheral circulation: Endorsed by the Association for Research into Arterial Structure and Physiology (ARTERY) Society.

    Charalambos Vlachopoulos;Panagiotis Xaplanteris;Victor Aboyans;Marianne Brodmann

  • Adverse prognostic significance of concentric remodeling of the left ventricle in hypertensive patients with normal left ventricular mass.

    Paolo Verdecchia;Giuseppe Schillaci;Claudia Borgioni;Antonella Ciucci

  • Awake systolic blood pressure variability correlates with target-organ damage in hypertensive subjects

    Alfonso Tatasciore;Giulia Renda;Marco Zimarino;Manola Soccio

  • Different Prognostic Impact of 24-Hour Mean Blood Pressure and Pulse Pressure on Stroke and Coronary Artery Disease in Essential Hypertension

    Paolo Verdecchia;Giuseppe Schillaci;Gianpaolo Reboldi;Stanley S. Franklin

  • Blunted nocturnal fall in blood pressure in hypertensive women with future cardiovascular morbid events.

    P Verdecchia;G Schillaci;C Gatteschi;I Zampi

  • Prognostic significance of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in essential hypertension

    Giuseppe Schillaci;Leonella Pasqualini;Paolo Verdecchia;Gaetano Vaudo

  • Short- and long-term incidence of stroke in white-coat hypertension.

    Paolo Verdecchia;Gian Paolo Reboldi;Fabio Angeli;Giuseppe Schillaci

  • Prognostic Value of a New Electrocardiographic Method for Diagnosis of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Essential Hypertension

    Paolo Verdecchia;Giuseppe Schillaci;Claudia Borgioni;Antonella Ciucci

  • CD4+CD28− T Lymphocytes Contribute to Early Atherosclerotic Damage in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients

    Roberto Gerli;Giuseppe Schillaci;Andrea Giordano;Elena Bartoloni Bocci

  • Relationship Between Short-Term Blood Pressure Variability and Large-Artery Stiffness in Human Hypertension Findings From 2 Large Databases

    Giuseppe Schillaci;Grzegorz Bilo;Giacomo Pucci;Stéphane Laurent

  • Improved electrocardiographic diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy.

    Giuseppe Schillaci;Paolo Verdecchia;Claudia Borgioni;Antonella Ciucci

Frequent Co-Authors

Matteo Pirro
Matteo Pirro University of Perugia
Paolo Verdecchia
Paolo Verdecchia University of Perugia
Roberto Gerli
Roberto Gerli University of Perugia
Gianfranco Parati
Gianfranco Parati University of Milano-Bicocca
Alessia Alunno
Alessia Alunno University of L'Aquila
Giuseppe Ambrosio
Giuseppe Ambrosio University of Perugia
Tamas L. Horvath
Tamas L. Horvath Yale University
Aldo P. Maggioni
Aldo P. Maggioni Heart Care Foundation, ANMCO Research Center, Florence
Yehuda Shoenfeld
Yehuda Shoenfeld Sheba Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a career in medicine or healthcare, there are flexible online pathways that can help you achieve your goals. For registered nurses who want to become nurse practitioners, exploring adn to np programs online can be a practical way to advance your career while maintaining your current job.

Nutrition is another rapidly growing field. The best online food science degree programs combine coursework in biology, chemistry, and the science of nutrition, opening up opportunities in healthcare, food industry, and research.

For those interested in healthcare leadership roles, earning a master’s degree from top cahme-accredited mha programs can provide a strong foundation in healthcare management, preparing graduates for roles in hospitals, public health organizations, and more.

If you are already an RN looking to complete your bachelor’s degree, you can benefit from rn to bsn programs no clinicals, which offer convenient online options that typically do not require in-person clinical hours.

These online degrees offer flexible learning and open doors to a wide range of rewarding healthcare careers.

Best Scientists Citing Giuseppe Schillaci

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles