World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
52
Citations
13099
World Ranking
16511
National Ranking
6837

James C. Willey publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James C. Willey sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 176 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

James C. Willey D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James C. Willey sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

James C. Willey is affiliated with the University of Toledo in the United States. Their research spans primarily the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with notable contributions to several subfields including Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Molecular Biology, Cancer Research, Genetics, and Environmental Chemistry.

The scientist's work covers a range of main topics, including:

  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • RNA modifications and cancer
  • Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
  • Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
  • Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics

James C. Willey has published numerous papers with frequent appearances in venues such as Cancer Research, Translation The University of Toledo Journal of Medical Sciences, Genome Biology, Annals of Emergency Medicine, and Nature Biotechnology.

Some of the recent papers include:

  • "Evaluating the analytical validity of circulating tumor DNA sequencing assays for precision oncology," 2021, Nature Biotechnology
  • "Toward best practice in cancer mutation detection with whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing," 2021, Nature Biotechnology
  • "Cross-ancestry genome-wide meta-analysis of 61,047 cases and 947,237 controls identifies new susceptibility loci contributing to lung cancer," 2022, Nature Genetics
  • "A verified genomic reference sample for assessing performance of cancer panels detecting small variants of low allele frequency," 2021, Genome Biology
  • "The importance of low-dose CT screening to identify emphysema in asymptomatic participants with and without a prior diagnosis of COPD," 2021, Clinical Imaging

The scientist has collaborated frequently with co-authors including Erin L. Crawford, Daniel J. Craig, Rebecca Kusko, Todd Richmond, and Natalia Novoradovskaya.

Best Publications

  • The MicroArray Quality Control (MAQC) project shows inter- and intraplatform reproducibility of gene expression measurements

    Leming Shi;Laura H. Reid;Wendell D. Jones;Richard Shippy

  • The Microarray Quality Control (MAQC)-II study of common practices for the development and validation of microarray-based predictive models

    Leming Shi;Gregory Campbell;Wendell D. Jones;Fabien Campagne

  • A comprehensive assessment of RNA-seq accuracy, reproducibility and information content by the Sequencing Quality Control Consortium

    Zhenqiang Su;Paweł P. Łabaj;Sheng Li;Jean Thierry-Mieg

  • Evaluation of DNA microarray results with quantitative gene expression platforms.

    Roger D Canales;Yuling Luo;James C Willey;Bradley Austermiller

  • The balance of reproducibility, sensitivity, and specificity of lists of differentially expressed genes in microarray studies

    Leming Shi;Wendell D. Jones;Roderick V. Jensen;Stephen C. Harris

  • Bombesin and the C-terminal tetradecapeptide of gastrin-releasing peptide are growth factors for normal human bronchial epithelial cells

    J.C. Willey;J.F. Lechner;C.C. Harris

  • Differential DNA sequence deletions from chromosomes 3, 11, 13, and 17 in squamous-cell carcinoma, large-cell carcinoma, and adenocarcinoma of the human lung.

    A Weston;J C Willey;R Modali;H Sugimura

  • Transformation of human bronchial epithelial cells transfected by Harvey ras oncogene

    George H. Yoakum;John F. Lechner;Edward W. Gabrielson;Brent E. Korba

  • Method for quantitative measurement of gene expression using multiplex competitive reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction

    James C. Willey

  • Variation in transcriptional regulation of cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor p21waf1/cip1 among human bronchogenic carcinomas

    Michael W Harr;Timothy G Graves;Erin L Crawford;Kristy A Warner

  • ABCC5, ERCC2, XPA and XRCC1 transcript abundance levels correlate with cisplatin chemoresistance in non-small cell lung cancer cell lines

    David A Weaver;Erin L Crawford;Kristy A Warner;Fadel Elkhairi

  • Using RNA sample titrations to assess microarray platform performance and normalization techniques

    Richard Shippy;Stephanie Fulmer-Smentek;Roderick V Jensen;Wendell D Jones

  • Extracellular glutathione peroxidase in human lung epithelial lining fluid and in lung cells

    N. Avissar;J. N. Finkelstein;S. Horowitz;J. C. Willey

  • Evaluating the analytical validity of circulating tumor DNA sequencing assays for precision oncology

    Ira W. Deveson;Binsheng Gong;Kevin Lai;Jennifer S. LoCoco

  • Immortalization of normal human bronchial epithelial cells by human papillomaviruses 16 or 18.

    James C. Willey;Alberec Broussoud;Ambereen Sleemi;William P. Bennett

  • Quantitative RT-PCR measurement of cytochromes p450 1A1, 1B1, and 2B7, microsomal epoxide hydrolase, and NADPH oxidoreductase expression in lung cells of smokers and nonsmokers

    James C. Willey;Erin L. Coy;Mark W. Frampton;Alfonso Torres

  • Pathobiological Effects of Acrolein in Cultured Human Bronchial Epithelial Cells

    Roland C. Grafström;Jeannette M. Dypbukt;James C. Willey;Kristina Sundqvist

  • Stable low-level expression of p21WAF1/CIP1 in A549 human bronchogenic carcinoma cell line-derived clones down-regulates E2F1 mRNA and restores cell proliferation control.

    Timothy G Graves;Michael W Harr;Erin L Crawford;James C Willey

  • Xenobiotic metabolism enzyme gene expression in human bronchial epithelial and alveolar macrophage cells.

    James C. Willey;Erin Coy;Colleen Brolly;Mark J. Utell

  • Expression measurement of many genes simultaneously by quantitative RT-PCR using standardized mixtures of competitive templates.

    James C. Willey;Erin L. Crawford;Clara M. Jackson;David A. Weaver

Frequent Co-Authors

Curtis C. Harris
Curtis C. Harris National Institutes of Health
Leming Shi
Leming Shi Fudan University
Quan Zhen Li
Quan Zhen Li The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Weida Tong
Weida Tong National Center for Toxicological Research
Mei Lu
Mei Lu Henry Ford Health System
Tom K. Hei
Tom K. Hei Columbia University
Huixiao Hong
Huixiao Hong United States Food and Drug Administration
Wenzhong Xiao
Wenzhong Xiao Harvard University
Pierre P. Massion
Pierre P. Massion Vanderbilt University Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees related to Biology and Biochemistry can open up diverse and rewarding career options. Many students choose to build on a science background by moving into healthcare management, nutrition, or nursing. For those seeking leadership roles, programs like the fastest online master's in healthcare administration enable graduates to efficiently enter managerial positions in healthcare organizations.

If your interests include mental health, consider the shortest pmhnp program—an accelerated pathway to become a Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner (PMHNP). Nutrition science is another growing field, and you can streamline your entry with an accelerated nutrition degree online, preparing you for roles in wellness, education, or clinical settings.

For those focused on the business side of healthcare, an affordable online mba healthcare management blends advanced business skills with sector-specific knowledge, expanding your career horizons. Each path leverages online study flexibility and can be completed faster or more affordably than traditional options, making them excellent complements to a background in Biology or Biochemistry.

Best Scientists Citing James C. Willey

Trending Scientists