World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
89
Citations
33548
World Ranking
12571
National Ranking
6433

Peter M. Okin publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter M. Okin sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 453 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Peter M. Okin D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter M. Okin sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 89 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter M. Okin is affiliated with Cornell University in the United States and is active in the field of medicine with a focus on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine. Their research spans several subfields including radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, surgery, infectious diseases, and pulmonary and respiratory medicine.

The scientist's recent publications cover a range of topics related to heart health and cardiovascular conditions. Notable papers include Electrocardiographic Findings in Coronavirus Disease-19: Insights on Mortality and Underlying Myocardial Processes (2020) published in the Journal of Cardiac Failure, Machine Learning Prediction of Stroke Mechanism in Embolic Strokes of Undetermined Source (2020) in Stroke, Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Adults With a History of Heart Failure Hospitalized for COVID-19 (2021) in Circulation Heart Failure, Atrial fibrillation onset before heart failure or vice versa: what is worst? A nationwide register study (2022) in EP Europace, and Silent Myocardial Infarction and Subsequent Ischemic Stroke in the Cardiovascular Health Study (2021) in Neurology.

The main topics addressed in their work include:

  • Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Long-Term Effects of COVID-19

Frequent collaborators in the scientist's work include:

  • Richard B. Devereux
  • Kristian Wachtell
  • Stevo Julius
  • Sverre E. Kjeldsen
  • Hooman Kamel

Peter M. Okin has published extensively in several prominent journals. The publication venues with multiple contributions include:

  • Stroke
  • Exploration of Medicine
  • European Heart Journal
  • Circulation
  • UNC Libraries

Their work contributes primarily to the medical field with a strong emphasis on the cardiovascular system and related diagnostic and treatment strategies. The varied subfields and topics indicate interdisciplinary involvement, spanning clinical and imaging research as well as the study of infectious disease impacts on cardiovascular health.

Best Publications

  • Prognostic value of multidetector coronary computed tomographic angiography for prediction of all-cause mortality.

    James K. Min;Leslee J. Shaw;Richard B. Devereux;Peter M. Okin

  • Angiogenesis Gene Therapy Phase I Assessment of Direct Intramyocardial Administration of an Adenovirus Vector Expressing VEGF121 cDNA to Individuals With Clinically Significant Severe Coronary Artery Disease

    Todd K. Rosengart;Leonard Y. Lee;Shailen R. Patel;Timothy A. Sanborn

  • Prognostic implications of left ventricular hypertrophy.

    Babak A. Vakili;Peter M. Okin;Richard B. Devereux

  • Recommendations for the Standardization and Interpretation of the Electrocardiogram: Part I: The Electrocardiogram and Its Technology A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology

    Paul Kligfield;Leonard S. Gettes;James J. Bailey;Rory Childers

  • Regression of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy during antihypertensive treatment and the prediction of major cardiovascular events.

    Peter M. Okin;Richard B. Devereux;Sverker Jern;Sverre E. Kjeldsen

  • Albuminuria and Cardiovascular Risk in Hypertensive Patients with Left Ventricular Hypertrophy: The LIFE Study

    Kristian Wachtell;Hans Ibsen;Michael H. Olsen;Knut Borch-Johnsen

  • Recommendations for the Standardization and Interpretation of the Electrocardiogram

    Paul Kligfield;Leonard S. Gettes;James J. Bailey;Rory Childers

  • Impaired chronotropic response to exercise stress testing as a predictor of mortality.

    Michael S. Lauer;Gary S. Francis;Peter M. Okin;Fredric J. Pashkow

  • Impaired Heart Rate Response to Graded Exercise Prognostic Implications of Chronotropic Incompetence in the Framingham Heart Study

    Michael S. Lauer;Peter M. Okin;Martin G. Larson;Jane C. Evans

  • Atrial Fibrillation and Mechanisms of Stroke: Time for a New Model.

    Hooman Kamel;Peter M. Okin;Mitchell S.V. Elkind;Costantino Iadecola

  • Risk of Arterial Thromboembolism in Patients With Cancer

    Babak B. Navi;Anne S. Reiner;Hooman Kamel;Costantino Iadecola

  • Assessment of QT interval and QT dispersion for prediction of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in American Indians: The Strong Heart Study.

    Peter M. Okin;Richard B. Devereux;Barbara V. Howard;Richard R. Fabsitz

  • Electrocardiographic identification of increased left ventricular mass by simple voltage-duration products

    Peter M. Okin;Mary J. Roman;Richard B. Devereux;Paul Kligfield

  • Electrocardiographic detection of left ventricular hypertrophy by the simple QRS voltage-duration product.

    Thomas J. Molloy;Peter M. Okin;Richard B. Devereux;Paul Kligfield

  • Assessment of the 12-lead electrocardiogram as a screening test for detection of cardiovascular disease in healthy general populations of young people (12-25 years of age): a scientific statement from the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology.

    Barry J. Maron;Richard A. Friedman;Paul Kligfield;Benjamin D. Levine

  • Cerebral Vascular Disease and Neurovascular Injury in Ischemic Stroke

    Xiaoming Hu;T. Michael De Silva;Jun Chen;Frank M. Faraci

  • AHA/ACCF/HRS Recommendations for the Standardization and Interpretation of the Electrocardiogram Part V: Electrocardiogram Changes Associated With Cardiac Chamber Hypertrophy: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society: Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology

    E. William Hancock;Barbara J. Deal;David M. Mirvis;Peter Okin

  • HIGH CENTRAL PULSE PRESSURE IS INDEPENDENTLY ASSOCIATED WITH ADVERSE CARDIOVASCULAR OUTCOME: THE STRONG HEART STUDY

    Mary J. Roman;Richard B. Devereux;Jorge R. Kizer;Peter M. Okin

  • Regression of Electrocardiographic Left Ventricular Hypertrophy by Losartan Versus Atenolol The Losartan Intervention For Endpoint Reduction in Hypertension (LIFE) Study

    Peter M. Okin;Richard B. Devereux;Sverker Jern;Sverre E. Kjeldsen

  • Albuminuria and cardiovascular risk in hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy: The LIFE Study

    Hans Ibsen;Kristian Wachtell;Michael H. Olsen;Knut Borch-JohnseN

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard B. Devereux
Richard B. Devereux Cornell University
Sverre E. Kjeldsen
Sverre E. Kjeldsen University of Oslo
Björn Dahlöf
Björn Dahlöf Sahlgrenska University Hospital
Paul Kligfield
Paul Kligfield Cornell University
Kristian Wachtell
Kristian Wachtell Cornell University
Markku S. Nieminen
Markku S. Nieminen University of Helsinki
Hooman Kamel
Hooman Kamel Cornell University
Stevo Julius
Stevo Julius University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Mary J. Roman
Mary J. Roman Cornell University
Elsayed Z. Soliman
Elsayed Z. Soliman Wake Forest University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in medicine opens up various online educational paths, each catering to diverse interests and career goals. For registered nurses aiming to become nurse practitioners, there are rn to np programs that provide seamless transitions from ADN to MSN, supporting career advancement in advanced practice nursing.

If your interest lies in the intersection of health and nutrition, exploring the best online food science degree options can lead to opportunities in food technology, public health, or clinical nutrition roles.

For those interested in health administration, choosing a cahme accredited online mha ensures you graduate from a program recognized for its quality, giving you a way to advance into healthcare leadership positions.

Finally, if you’re looking for flexible options to build on your nursing education, the best online rn to bsn programs without clinical requirements can help you earn a bachelor’s degree conveniently, particularly for working nurses with tight schedules.

Each of these pathways supports different aspects of healthcare, helping you tailor your education to your desired career outcome.

Best Scientists Citing Peter M. Okin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles