World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Best Female Scientists
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Best Female Scientists 121 518 491 305 286 508 76753
Medicine 121 3541 3310 1950 1801 508 78051

Mary J. Roman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mary J. Roman between 1984 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mary J. Roman published across 42 years, from 1984 to 2025, averaging 12.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 36 publications in 2006. 13 of the 520 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 36. Peak 36 publications in 2006. 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 4 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 8 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 8 publications 1992: 10 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 9 publications 1995: 27 publications 1996: 17 publications 1997: 17 publications 1998: 23 publications 1999: 16 publications 2000: 11 publications 2001: 26 publications 2002: 16 publications 2003: 25 publications 2004: 13 publications 2005: 16 publications 2006: 36 publications 2007: 18 publications 2008: 25 publications 2009: 19 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 8 publications
1984 2025

520 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mary J. Roman: publications per year, 1984 to 2025
Year Publications
1984 1
1985 0
1986 1
1987 4
1988 4
1989 8
1990 5
1991 8
1992 10
1993 7
1994 9
1995 27
1996 17
1997 17
1998 23
1999 16
2000 11
2001 26
2002 16
2003 25
2004 13
2005 16
2006 36
2007 18
2008 25
2009 19
2010 14
2011 6
2012 11
2013 14
2014 13
2015 11
2016 17
2017 13
2018 3
2019 4
2020 12
2021 14
2022 6
2023 7
2024 5
2025 8
Total 520
Download as CSV

Mary J. Roman publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary J. Roman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 501–520 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 508 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617 508
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Mary J. Roman D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary J. Roman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 120–121 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 121 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287 121
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Best Female Scientists Award

Overview

Mary J. Roman is a researcher affiliated with Cornell University in the United States. Their academic work primarily focuses on medicine, with a concentration in cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, as well as pulmonary and respiratory medicine. The scope of their studies also includes epidemiology, genetics, and surgery.

The main topics of their research include:

  • Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Aortic aneurysm repair treatments
  • Congenital Heart Disease Studies
  • Connective tissue disorders research
  • Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
  • Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity

Mary J. Roman has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Richard B. Devereux
  • Leonard N. Girardi
  • Jonathan W. Weinsaft
  • Federico M. Asch
  • Siddharth K. Prakash

Their research has been published extensively in a variety of scientific venues. The most frequent publication journals include:

  • Circulation
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
  • Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
  • The Annals of Thoracic Surgery

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Mary J. Roman (with year and venue) include:

  • International consensus statement on nomenclature and classification of the congenital bicuspid aortic valve and its aortopathy, for clinical, surgical, interventional and research purposes, 2021, European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
  • International consensus statement on nomenclature and classification of the congenital bicuspid aortic valve and its aortopathy, for clinical, surgical, interventional and research purposes, 2021, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
  • International Consensus Statement on Nomenclature and Classification of the Congenital Bicuspid Aortic Valve and Its Aortopathy, for Clinical, Surgical, Interventional and Research Purposes, 2021, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
  • Pregnancy-Related Aortic Complications in Women With Marfan Syndrome, 2021, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Aortic hemodynamics assessment prior and after valve sparing reconstruction: A patient-specific 4D flow-based FSI model, 2021, Computers in Biology and Medicine

Best Publications

  • Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology.

    Roberto M. Lang;Michelle Bierig;Richard B. Devereux;Frank A. Flachskampf

  • Recommendations for chamber quantification

    Roberto M. Lang;Michelle Bierig;Richard B Devereux;Frank A Flachskampf

  • Patterns of left ventricular hypertrophy and geometric remodeling in essential hypertension

    Antonello Ganau;Richard B. Devereux;Mary J. Roman;Giovanni de Simone

  • Left ventricular mass and body size in normotensive children and adults: assessment of allometric relations and impact of overweight.

    Giovanni de Simone;Stephen R. Daniels;Stephen R. Daniels;Richard B. Devereux;Richard A. Meyer;Richard A. Meyer

  • Prevalence and correlates of accelerated atherosclerosis in systemic lupus erythematosus

    Mary J Roman;Beth-Ann Shanker;Adrienne Davis;Michael D Lockshin

  • Central pressure more strongly relates to vascular disease and outcome than does brachial pressure: the Strong Heart Study.

    Mary J. Roman;Richard B. Devereux;Jorge R. Kizer;Elisa T. Lee

  • Two-dimensional echocardiographic aortic root dimensions in normal children and adults.

    Mary J. Roman;Richard B. Devereux;Randi Kramer-Fox;John O'Loughlin

  • Impact of Diabetes on Cardiac Structure and Function The Strong Heart Study

    Richard B. Devereux;Mary J. Roman;Mary Paranicas;Michael J. O’Grady

  • Central Blood Pressure Measurements and Antihypertensive Therapy: A Consensus Document

    Enrico Agabiti-Rosei;Giuseppe Mancia;Michael F. O'Rourke;Mary J. Roman

  • Central blood pressure: current evidence and clinical importance

    Carmel M. McEniery;John R. Cockcroft;Mary J. Roman;Stanley S. Franklin

  • Assessment of left ventricular function by the midwall fractional shortening/end-systolic stress relation in human hypertension

    Giovanni de Simone;Richard B. Devereux;Mary J. Roman;Antonello Ganau

  • Life expectancy in the Marfan syndrome

    David I. Silverman;Kevin J. Burton;Jonathon Gray;Matthew S. Bosner

  • Role of Pulse Pressure Amplification in Arterial Hypertension: Experts’ Opinion and Review of the Data

    Alberto P. Avolio;Luc M. Van Bortel;Pierre Boutouyrie;John R. Cockcroft

  • Central but not brachial blood pressure predicts cardiovascular events in an unselected geriatric population: the ICARe Dicomano Study.

    Riccardo Pini;M. Chiara Cavallini;Vittorio Palmieri;Niccolò Marchionni

  • Mitral Ratio of Peak Early to Late Diastolic Filling Velocity as a Predictor of Mortality in Middle-Aged and Elderly Adults The Strong Heart Study

    Jonathan N. Bella;Vittorio Palmieri;Mary J. Roman;Jennifer E. Liu

  • Electrocardiographic identification of increased left ventricular mass by simple voltage-duration products

    Peter M. Okin;Mary J. Roman;Richard B. Devereux;Paul Kligfield

  • Atenolol versus Losartan in Children and Young Adults with Marfan's Syndrome

    Ronald V. Lacro;Harry C. Dietz;Lynn A. Sleeper;Anji T. Yetman

  • Relation of obesity and gender to left ventricular hypertrophy in normotensive and hypertensive adults.

    G de Simone;R B Devereux;M J Roman;M H Alderman

  • Cardiac and arterial target organ damage in adults with elevated ambulatory and normal office blood pressure.

    Jennifer E. Liu;Mary J. Roman;Riccardo Pini;Joseph E. Schwartz

  • Association of aortic dilation with regurgitant, stenotic and functionally normal bicuspid aortic valves.

    Rebecca T. Hahn;Mary J. Roman;Allen H. Mogtadek;Richard B. Devereux

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard B. Devereux
Richard B. Devereux Cornell University
Barbara V. Howard
Barbara V. Howard MedStar Health
Elisa T. Lee
Elisa T. Lee University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
Giovanni de Simone
Giovanni de Simone University of Naples Federico II
Richard R. Fabsitz
Richard R. Fabsitz George Mason University
Thomas G. Pickering
Thomas G. Pickering Columbia University
Paul Kligfield
Paul Kligfield Cornell University
Peter M. Okin
Peter M. Okin Cornell University
Joseph E. Schwartz
Joseph E. Schwartz Stony Brook University
Jeffrey S. Borer
Jeffrey S. Borer SUNY Downstate Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Medicine in the USA opens up a variety of online degree options and career pathways, especially in the nursing field. Prospective students who already hold a registered nurse (RN) license can consider rn to bsn online programs to build on their credentials and open avenues to leadership roles or advanced clinical practice.

For those aiming to move quickly into nursing with a non-nursing bachelor's degree, accelerated options like an online direct entry msn program are available. These offer a fast track into the nursing profession and can be ideal for career changers.

Individuals looking to achieve the highest level of nursing education might explore an online phd in nursing. This degree can unlock opportunities in research, academia, or advanced clinical roles.

Additionally, many students inquire about whats the easiest nursing program to get into? to help streamline their entry into nursing careers and secure a place in a reputable school.

Best Scientists Citing Mary J. Roman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles