World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Best Female Scientists
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Best Female Scientists

D-Index
121
Citations
76753
World Ranking
518
National Ranking
305

Medicine

D-Index
121
Citations
78051
World Ranking
3541
National Ranking
1950

Mary J. Roman publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary J. Roman sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 508 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Mary J. Roman D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary J. Roman sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 121 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Best Female Scientists Award

Overview

Mary J. Roman is a researcher affiliated with Cornell University in the United States. Their academic work primarily focuses on medicine, with a concentration in cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, as well as pulmonary and respiratory medicine. The scope of their studies also includes epidemiology, genetics, and surgery.

The main topics of their research include:

  • Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Aortic aneurysm repair treatments
  • Congenital Heart Disease Studies
  • Connective tissue disorders research
  • Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
  • Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity

Mary J. Roman has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Richard B. Devereux
  • Leonard N. Girardi
  • Jonathan W. Weinsaft
  • Federico M. Asch
  • Siddharth K. Prakash

Their research has been published extensively in a variety of scientific venues. The most frequent publication journals include:

  • Circulation
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
  • Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
  • The Annals of Thoracic Surgery

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Mary J. Roman (with year and venue) include:

  • International consensus statement on nomenclature and classification of the congenital bicuspid aortic valve and its aortopathy, for clinical, surgical, interventional and research purposes, 2021, European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
  • International consensus statement on nomenclature and classification of the congenital bicuspid aortic valve and its aortopathy, for clinical, surgical, interventional and research purposes, 2021, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
  • International Consensus Statement on Nomenclature and Classification of the Congenital Bicuspid Aortic Valve and Its Aortopathy, for Clinical, Surgical, Interventional and Research Purposes, 2021, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
  • Pregnancy-Related Aortic Complications in Women With Marfan Syndrome, 2021, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Aortic hemodynamics assessment prior and after valve sparing reconstruction: A patient-specific 4D flow-based FSI model, 2021, Computers in Biology and Medicine

Best Publications

  • Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology.

    Roberto M. Lang;Michelle Bierig;Richard B. Devereux;Frank A. Flachskampf

  • Recommendations for chamber quantification

    Roberto M. Lang;Michelle Bierig;Richard B Devereux;Frank A Flachskampf

  • Patterns of left ventricular hypertrophy and geometric remodeling in essential hypertension

    Antonello Ganau;Richard B. Devereux;Mary J. Roman;Giovanni de Simone

  • Left ventricular mass and body size in normotensive children and adults: assessment of allometric relations and impact of overweight.

    Giovanni de Simone;Stephen R. Daniels;Stephen R. Daniels;Richard B. Devereux;Richard A. Meyer;Richard A. Meyer

  • Prevalence and correlates of accelerated atherosclerosis in systemic lupus erythematosus

    Mary J Roman;Beth-Ann Shanker;Adrienne Davis;Michael D Lockshin

  • Central pressure more strongly relates to vascular disease and outcome than does brachial pressure: the Strong Heart Study.

    Mary J. Roman;Richard B. Devereux;Jorge R. Kizer;Elisa T. Lee

  • Two-dimensional echocardiographic aortic root dimensions in normal children and adults.

    Mary J. Roman;Richard B. Devereux;Randi Kramer-Fox;John O'Loughlin

  • Impact of Diabetes on Cardiac Structure and Function The Strong Heart Study

    Richard B. Devereux;Mary J. Roman;Mary Paranicas;Michael J. O’Grady

  • Central Blood Pressure Measurements and Antihypertensive Therapy: A Consensus Document

    Enrico Agabiti-Rosei;Giuseppe Mancia;Michael F. O'Rourke;Mary J. Roman

  • Central blood pressure: current evidence and clinical importance

    Carmel M. McEniery;John R. Cockcroft;Mary J. Roman;Stanley S. Franklin

  • Assessment of left ventricular function by the midwall fractional shortening/end-systolic stress relation in human hypertension

    Giovanni de Simone;Richard B. Devereux;Mary J. Roman;Antonello Ganau

  • Life expectancy in the Marfan syndrome

    David I. Silverman;Kevin J. Burton;Jonathon Gray;Matthew S. Bosner

  • Role of Pulse Pressure Amplification in Arterial Hypertension: Experts’ Opinion and Review of the Data

    Alberto P. Avolio;Luc M. Van Bortel;Pierre Boutouyrie;John R. Cockcroft

  • Central but not brachial blood pressure predicts cardiovascular events in an unselected geriatric population: the ICARe Dicomano Study.

    Riccardo Pini;M. Chiara Cavallini;Vittorio Palmieri;Niccolò Marchionni

  • Mitral Ratio of Peak Early to Late Diastolic Filling Velocity as a Predictor of Mortality in Middle-Aged and Elderly Adults The Strong Heart Study

    Jonathan N. Bella;Vittorio Palmieri;Mary J. Roman;Jennifer E. Liu

  • Electrocardiographic identification of increased left ventricular mass by simple voltage-duration products

    Peter M. Okin;Mary J. Roman;Richard B. Devereux;Paul Kligfield

  • Atenolol versus Losartan in Children and Young Adults with Marfan's Syndrome

    Ronald V. Lacro;Harry C. Dietz;Lynn A. Sleeper;Anji T. Yetman

  • Relation of obesity and gender to left ventricular hypertrophy in normotensive and hypertensive adults.

    G de Simone;R B Devereux;M J Roman;M H Alderman

  • Cardiac and arterial target organ damage in adults with elevated ambulatory and normal office blood pressure.

    Jennifer E. Liu;Mary J. Roman;Riccardo Pini;Joseph E. Schwartz

  • Association of aortic dilation with regurgitant, stenotic and functionally normal bicuspid aortic valves.

    Rebecca T. Hahn;Mary J. Roman;Allen H. Mogtadek;Richard B. Devereux

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard B. Devereux
Richard B. Devereux Cornell University
Barbara V. Howard
Barbara V. Howard MedStar Health
Elisa T. Lee
Elisa T. Lee University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
Giovanni de Simone
Giovanni de Simone University of Naples Federico II
Richard R. Fabsitz
Richard R. Fabsitz George Mason University
Thomas G. Pickering
Thomas G. Pickering Columbia University
Paul Kligfield
Paul Kligfield Cornell University
Peter M. Okin
Peter M. Okin Cornell University
Joseph E. Schwartz
Joseph E. Schwartz Stony Brook University
Jeffrey S. Borer
Jeffrey S. Borer SUNY Downstate Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Medicine in the USA opens up a variety of online degree options and career pathways, especially in the nursing field. Prospective students who already hold a registered nurse (RN) license can consider rn to bsn online programs to build on their credentials and open avenues to leadership roles or advanced clinical practice.

For those aiming to move quickly into nursing with a non-nursing bachelor's degree, accelerated options like an online direct entry msn program are available. These offer a fast track into the nursing profession and can be ideal for career changers.

Individuals looking to achieve the highest level of nursing education might explore an online phd in nursing. This degree can unlock opportunities in research, academia, or advanced clinical roles.

Additionally, many students inquire about whats the easiest nursing program to get into? to help streamline their entry into nursing careers and secure a place in a reputable school.

Best Scientists Citing Mary J. Roman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles