World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 33 9458 8726 3998 3614 93 4394

Steven E. Brauth publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Steven E. Brauth between 1971 and 2019, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Steven E. Brauth published across 49 years, from 1971 to 2019, averaging 2.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2017. 7 of the 101 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1971 to 2019. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2017. 1971: 1 publication 1972: 1 publication 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 2 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 2 publications 1978: 2 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 3 publications 1981: 2 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 1 publication 1984: 3 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 2 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 5 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 2 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 0 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 0 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 3 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 2 publications
1971 2019

101 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Steven E. Brauth: publications per year, 1971 to 2019
Year Publications
1971 1
1972 1
1973 0
1974 0
1975 2
1976 0
1977 2
1978 2
1979 0
1980 3
1981 2
1982 1
1983 1
1984 3
1985 2
1986 3
1987 4
1988 3
1989 1
1990 2
1991 2
1992 1
1993 1
1994 5
1995 1
1996 2
1997 4
1998 1
1999 2
2000 2
2001 4
2002 2
2003 1
2004 0
2005 2
2006 2
2007 1
2008 0
2009 0
2010 1
2011 3
2012 4
2013 0
2014 3
2015 3
2016 5
2017 9
2018 5
2019 2
Total 101
Download as CSV

Steven E. Brauth publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven E. Brauth sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 88–97 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 93 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452 93
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Steven E. Brauth D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven E. Brauth sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172 33
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Steven E. Brauth is affiliated with the University of Maryland, College Park in the United States. Their academic profile centers on research activities linked to this institution.

There are no listed recent papers or documented publications from Steven E. Brauth, so details regarding specific research outputs or their dissemination venues are not available.

Information regarding frequent co-authors, publication venues, and book publications has not been provided, thus there is no record of collaborative patterns or publishing platforms.

Details about the main fields, subfields of study, or the primary topics addressed in their work are also absent.

There are no records of awards or honors associated with Steven E. Brauth in the available data.

Steven E. Brauth is currently living, and no additional personal or professional details have been supplied.

Best Publications

  • Evolution of the amniote basal ganglia

    Anton Reiner;Steven E Brauth;Harvey J. Karten

  • Prosencephalic pathways related to the paleostriatum of the pigeon (Columba livia).

    Steven E. Brauth;John L. Ferguson;Cheryl A. Kitt

  • Projections of the paleostriatum upon the midbrain tegmentum in the pigeon

    C.A. Kitt;S.E. Brauth

  • Vocal control pathways through the anterior forebrain of a parrot (Melopsittacus undulatus)

    Sarah E. Durand;James T. Heaton;Stuart K. Amateau;Steven E. Brauth

  • Distribution of mu, delta, and kappa opiate receptor types in the forebrain and midbrain of pigeons

    Anton Reiner;Steven E. Brauth;Cheryl A. Kitt;Remi Quirion

  • Direction-selective single units in the nucleus lentiformis mesencephali of the pigeon (Columba livia).

    B. J. Winterson;S. E. Brauth

  • Basal ganglionic pathways to the tectum: studies in reptiles.

    Anton Reiner;Steven E. Brauth;Cheryl A. Kitt;Harvey J. Karten

  • Telencephalic projections from midbrain and isthmal cell groups in the pigeon. I. Locus coeruleus and subcoeruleus.

    Cheryl A. Kitt;Steven E. Brauth

  • Telencephalic projections from midbrain and isthmal cell groups in the pigeon. II. The nigral complex

    Cheryl A. Kitt;Steven E. Brauth

  • The paleostriatal system of Caiman crocodilus.

    Steven E. Brauth;Cheryl A. Kitt

  • The substance P-containing striatotegmental path in reptiles: an immunohistochemical study.

    Steven E. Brauth;Anton Reiner;Cheryl A. Kitt;Harvey J. Karten

  • Direct accessory optic projections to the vestibulo-cerebellum: A possible channel for oculomotor control systems

    Brauth Se

  • Distribution of Neurons Projecting to the Retina of Caiman crocodilus

    John L. Ferguson;Patrick J. Mulvanny;Steven E. Brauth

  • A paleostriatal-thalamic-telencephalic path in pigeons.

    C.A. Kitt;S.E. Brauth

  • Auditory Pathways in the Budgerigar

    Steven E. Brauth;Colleen M. McHale

  • Auditory evoked potentials, motor potentials and reaction time ☆

    Lawrence Karlin;Merrill J Martz;Steven E Brauth;Arnold M Mordkoff

  • Auditory Pathways in the Budgerigar (Part 1 of 2)

    Steven E. Brauth;Colleen M. McHale;Catherine A. Brasher;Robert J. Dooling

  • Core and Shell Song Systems Unique to the Parrot Brain

    Mukta Chakraborty;Solveig Walløe;Signe Nedergaard;Emma E. Fridel

  • Cholinergic neurons in the telencephalon of the reptile Caiman crocodilus

    Steven E. Brauth;Cheryl A. Kitt;Donald L. Price;Bruce H. Wainer

  • Midbrain unit activity during classical conditioning

    Steven E. Brauth;James Olds

Frequent Co-Authors

Cheryl A. Kitt
Cheryl A. Kitt Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Harvey J. Karten
Harvey J. Karten University of California, San Diego
Rémi Quirion
Rémi Quirion Douglas Mental Health University Institute
Charles R. Gerfen
Charles R. Gerfen National Institutes of Health
Bruce H. Wainer
Bruce H. Wainer Emory University
Dezhong Yao
Dezhong Yao University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
Erich D. Jarvis
Erich D. Jarvis Rockefeller University
Bente Pakkenberg
Bente Pakkenberg University of Copenhagen
Anton Reiner
Anton Reiner University of Tennessee Health Science Center
Donald L. Price
Donald L. Price Johns Hopkins University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you explore studying Neuroscience in the USA, it's valuable to consider related online degrees and career pathways. The demand for neuroscience expertise is growing, but similar fields like computer science, data science, and engineering are also among the most lucrative college degrees. These fields often overlap with neuroscience, especially in areas like neurotechnology and computational neuroscience.

For those seeking affordable options, there are several cheap online colleges offering flexible and accessible neuroscience-related programs. Some students choose to start with associate degrees or certifications to manage costs and build foundational skills.

You might also consider the value of stackable credentials. A variety of easy licenses and certifications to get online exist in fields like health informatics or research administration, providing additional expertise and job opportunities.

If flexibility is a top priority, exploring the easiest online college programs can help you balance studies with other commitments, without sacrificing career prospects in neuroscience or related domains.

Best Scientists Citing Steven E. Brauth

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles