World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Quentin Noirhomme

Quentin Noirhomme

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
51
Citations
12363
World Ranking
5457
National Ranking
64

Quentin Noirhomme publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Quentin Noirhomme sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 147 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Quentin Noirhomme D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Quentin Noirhomme sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Quentin Noirhomme is affiliated with the University of Liège in Belgium. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience, with a focus on multiple subfields including Cognitive Neuroscience, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, and Emergency Medicine.

The main topics covered by Noirhomme's work include:

  • Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
  • Emergency and Acute Care Studies
  • Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
  • Congenital Heart Disease Studies
  • Intraoperative Neuromonitoring and Anesthetic Effects

Noirhomme has published in several venues, with recurring contributions to:

  • TUGraz OPEN Library (Graz University of Technology)
  • American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Journal of Statistical Mechanics Theory and Experiment
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

Their recent papers include:

  • "Validation of a new electrophysiological fetal heart rate monitor: comparison with cardiotocography," 2021, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • "Improved Classification Of Auditory Evoked Event-Related Potentials," 2020, TUGraz OPEN Library (Graz University of Technology)
  • "Assessing the feasibility of long term home electrophysiological fetal heart rate monitoring," 2021, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • "Steady-State Somatosensory Evoked Potentials In Minimally Conscious Patients - Challenges And Perspectives," 2020, TUGraz OPEN Library (Graz University of Technology)
  • "Implementation of a New Independent SSVEP-Based BCI," 2020, TUGraz OPEN Library (Graz University of Technology)

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Steven Laureys
  • Christoph Pokorny
  • Gernot Müller-Putz
  • Elisa Rossetti
  • Hanne Mariën

Best Publications

  • Traumatic brain injury: integrated approaches to improve prevention, clinical care, and research

    Andrew I R Maas;David K Menon;P David Adelson;Nada Andelic

  • Default network connectivity reflects the level of consciousness in non-communicative brain- damaged patients

    Audrey Vanhaudenhuyse;Quentin Noirhomme;Luaba J.-F. Tshibanda;Marie-Aurelie Bruno

  • Breakdown of within- and between-network Resting State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Connectivity during Propofol-induced Loss of Consciousness

    Pierre Boveroux;Audrey Vanhaudenhuyse;Marie-Aurélie Bruno;Quentin Noirhomme

  • Two distinct neuronal networks mediate the awareness of environment and of self

    Audrey Vanhaudenhuyse;Athena Demertzi;Manuel Schabus;Quentin Noirhomme

  • Case-mix, care pathways, and outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injury in CENTER-TBI: a European prospective, multicentre, longitudinal, cohort study

    Ewout W. Steyerberg;Ewout W. Steyerberg;Eveline Wiegers;Charlie Sewalt;Andras Buki

  • Propofol anesthesia and sleep: a high-density EEG study

    Michael J.J. Murphy;Marie-Aurélie Bruno;Brady A. Riedner;Pierre Boveroux

  • Functional connectivity in the default network during resting state is preserved in a vegetative but not in a brain dead patient

    Mélanie Boly;Luaba Tshibanda;Audrey Vanhaudenhuyse;Quentin Noirhomme

  • Connectivity Changes Underlying Spectral EEG Changes during Propofol-Induced Loss of Consciousness

    Mélanie Boly;Rosalyn J Moran;Michael Murphy;Pierre Boveroux

  • Complexity of multi-dimensional spontaneous EEG decreases during propofol induced general anaesthesia

    Michael Schartner;Anil Seth;Quentin Noirhomme;Melanie Boly

  • Multiple fMRI system-level baseline connectivity is disrupted in patients with consciousness alterations

    Athena Demertzi;Francisco Gómez;Julia Sophia Crone;Audrey Vanhaudenhuyse

  • Resting-state EEG study of comatose patients: a connectivity and frequency analysis to find differences between vegetative and minimally conscious states.

    Rémy Lehembre;Marie-Aurélie Bruno;Audrey Vanhaudenhuyse;Camille Chatelle

  • Probing command following in patients with disorders of consciousness using a brain-computer interface.

    Dorothée Lulé;Quentin Noirhomme;Sonja C. Kleih;Sonja C. Kleih;Camille Chatelle

  • Large-scale signatures of unconsciousness are consistent with a departure from critical dynamics

    Enzo Tagliazucchi;Dante R. Chialvo;Michael Siniatchkin;Enrico Amico

  • Automated EEG entropy measurements in coma, vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome and minimally conscious state.

    Olivia Gosseries;Caroline Schnakers;Didier Ledoux;Audrey Vanhaudenhuyse

  • Electrophysiological correlates of behavioural changes in vigilance in vegetative state and minimally conscious state

    Eric Landsness;Marie Aurélie Bruno;Quentin Noirhomme;Brady Riedner

  • Granger causality analysis of steady-state electroencephalographic signals during propofol-induced anaesthesia.

    Adam B. Barrett;Michael Murphy;Marie-Aurélie Bruno;Quentin Noirhomme

  • Hypnotic modulation of resting state fMRI default mode and extrinsic network connectivity

    A. Demertzi;A. Soddu;M.-E. Faymonville;M.A. Bahri

  • Identifying the default-mode component in spatial IC analyses of patients with disorders of consciousness.

    Andrea Soddu;Audrey Vanhaudenhuyse;Mohamed Ali Bahri;Marie-Aurelie Bruno

  • Dynamic change of global and local information processing in propofol-induced loss and recovery of consciousness.

    Martin M. Monti;Evan S. Lutkenhoff;Mikail Rubinov;Pierre Boveroux

  • An independent SSVEP-based brain-computer interface in locked-in syndrome

    D. Lesenfants;D. Habbal;Z. Lugo;Z. Lugo;M. Lebeau

  • Large-scale signatures of unconsciousness are consistent with a departure from critical dynamics

    Enzo Tagliazucchi;Dante R. Chialvo;Michael Siniatchkin;Jean-Francois Brichant

Frequent Co-Authors

Steven Laureys
Steven Laureys University of Liège
Andrea Soddu
Andrea Soddu University of Western Ontario
Mélanie Boly
Mélanie Boly University of Wisconsin–Madison
Audrey Vanhaudenhuyse
Audrey Vanhaudenhuyse University of Liège
Marie-Aurélie Bruno
Marie-Aurélie Bruno University of Liège
Olivia Gosseries
Olivia Gosseries University of Liège
Camille Chatelle
Camille Chatelle Harvard Medical School
Christophe Phillips
Christophe Phillips University of Liège
Athena Demertzi
Athena Demertzi University of Liège
Pierre Maquet
Pierre Maquet University of Liège

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Quentin Noirhomme

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles