World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
42
Citations
7871
World Ranking
7337
National Ranking
2616

Herbert L. Windom publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Herbert L. Windom sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 111 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Herbert L. Windom D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Herbert L. Windom sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Herbert L. Windom is affiliated with the Skidaway Institute of Oceanography in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science and earth and planetary sciences, with notable contributions to the understanding of coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics and coastal and marine dynamics. Their work frequently addresses the interactions between sediment transport, geochemistry, and ecological sustainability in coastal and estuarine environments.

The scientist's recent publications include:

  • Changing River Discharge and Suspended Sediment Transport to the Georgia Bight: Implications to Saltmarsh Sustainability, 2022, Journal of Coastal Research
  • Fluvial Transport of Suspended Sediments in the Apalachicola Basin to Apalachicola Bay: Implications to Salt Marsh Sustainability, 2023, Journal of Coastal Research
  • Sources and transport pathways of trace metals to the outer continental shelf off South Carolina and Georgia, USA revealed from the otoliths of moray eels, 2024, Continental Shelf Research

Windom has collaborated with several researchers across their publications, including frequent co-authors such as Jonathan D. Palmer, Richard F. Lee, Kurunthachalam Kannan, and William B. Savidge.

Key topics explored in their research encompass:

  • Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
  • Coastal and Marine Dynamics
  • Aeolian processes and effects
  • Mercury impact and mitigation studies
  • Marine animal studies overview
  • Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
  • Heavy metals in environment

Publication venues where their work is commonly seen include:

  • Journal of Coastal Research
  • Marine Pollution Bulletin
  • Continental Shelf Research

Their subfields of study involve earth-surface processes, ecology, health, toxicology and mutagenesis, artificial intelligence applications, and pollution-related research. This multidisciplinary approach supports investigations into sediment dynamics, contaminant transport, and ecological implications in coastal regions.

Best Publications

  • The distribution of clay minerals in the World Ocean

    John J. Griffin;Herbert Windom;Edward D. Goldberg

  • Natural trace metal concentrations in estuarine and coastal marine sediments of the southeastern United States

    Herbert L. Windom;Steven J. Schropp;Fred D. Calder;Joseph D. Ryan

  • Interpretation of metal concentrations in estuarine sediments of Florida using aluminum as a reference element

    Steven J. Schropp;F. Graham Lewis;Herbert L. Windom;Joe D. Ryan

  • Distribution of total mercury and methyl mercury in water, sediment, and fish from south Florida estuaries.

    K. Kannan;R. G. Smith;R. F. Lee;H. L. Windom

  • Distribution of particulate trace metal in Patos Lagoon estuary (Brazil)

    L.F. Niencheski;H.L. Windom;R. Smith

  • The uptake and reduction of arsenic species by marine algae

    James G. Sanders;Herbert L. Windom

  • Submarine groundwater discharge : A large, previously unrecognized source of dissolved iron to the South Atlantic Ocean

    Herbert L. Windom;Willard S. Moore;L. Felipe H. Niencheski;Richard A. Jahnke

  • Sediment quality assessment studies of Tampa bay, Florida

    Scott R. Carr;Duane C. Chapman;Edward R. Long;Herbert L. Windom

  • Inadequacy of NASQAN data for assessing metal trends in the nation's rivers

    Herbert L. Windom;James T. Byrd;Ralph G. Smith;Feng Huan

  • Pollution history of the Savannah River estuary

    Edward D. Goldberg;John J. Griffin;Vern Hodge;Minoru Koide

  • Atmospheric Dust Records in Permanent Snowfields: Implications to Marine Sedimentation

    Unknown

  • Eolian contributions to marine sediments

    Unknown

  • Submarine groundwater discharge of nutrients to the ocean along a coastal lagoon barrier, Southern Brazil

    L. Felipe H. Niencheski;Herbert L. Windom;Willard S. Moore;Richard A. Jahnke

  • General guidelines for using the sediment quality triad

    Peter M. Chapman;Brian Anderson;Scott Carr;Virginia Engle

  • The historical record of metal enrichment in two Florida estuaries

    Clark R. Alexander;Ralph G. Smith;Fred D. Calder;Steven J. Schropp

  • Arsenic, Cadmium, Copper, Mercury, and Zinc in Some Species of North Atlantic Finfish

    H. Windom;R. Stickney;R. Smith;D. White

  • Behavior of copper in southeastern United States estuaries

    H. Windom;G. Wallace;R. Smith;N. Dudek

  • Biogeochemical processes in a freshwater–seawater mixing zone in permeable sediments along the coast of Southern Brazil

    H. Windom;F. Niencheski

  • Trace metal-nutrient relationships in estuaries

    H Windom;J Byrd;R Smith;M Hungspreugs

  • The distribution of methyl mercury in a contaminated salt marsh ecosystem

    Wayne S Gardner;D. R. Kendall;R. R. Odom;H. L. Windom

  • A Guide to the interpretation of metal concentrations in estuarine sediments

    Steven J. Schropp;Herbert L. Windom

  • Contamination of the marine environment from land-based sources

    H.L. Windom

  • Interpretation of Metal Concentrations in Estuarine Sediments of Florida Using

    Steven J. Schropp;F. Graham Lewis;Herbert L. Windom;Joe D. Ryan

Frequent Co-Authors

Willard S. Moore
Willard S. Moore University of South Carolina
Richard A. Jahnke
Richard A. Jahnke Skidaway Institute of Oceanography
Richard F. Lee
Richard F. Lee Skidaway Institute of Oceanography
Edward R. Long
Edward R. Long Washington Department of Ecology
Christopher G. Ingersoll
Christopher G. Ingersoll United States Geological Survey
Peter M. Chapman
Peter M. Chapman Golder Associates (Canada)
Wayne S. Gardner
Wayne S. Gardner The University of Texas at Austin
Paul K. Sibley
Paul K. Sibley University of Guelph
Patrick J. Mulholland
Patrick J. Mulholland Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Gilberto Fillmann
Gilberto Fillmann Federal University of Rio Grande

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in advancing their education in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career pathways. Many professionals benefit from accredited Eds to EdD programs that provide advanced knowledge in education and leadership, useful for environmental education roles. Discovering reputable programs can be made easier by researching accredited eds to edd programs.

Those aiming to combine social work with environmental advocacy might consider pursuing a Doctorate in Social Work, especially if cost is a concern. The availability of the cheapest dsw program options makes this path more accessible for many students seeking to impact community and environmental well-being.

For learners seeking flexibility and broad foundations, the cheapest online general studies degree programs offer affordable alternatives that can complement environmental studies and help pivot careers efficiently.

Additionally, those new to higher education or looking for a less demanding route may explore the easy bachelor's degree options to start building relevant skills. These degrees provide a practical stepping stone toward specialized environmental fields and sustainable career growth.

Best Scientists Citing Herbert L. Windom

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles