World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Environmental Sciences
Canada
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
70
Citations
16591
World Ranking
1696
National Ranking
57

Peter M. Chapman publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter M. Chapman sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 278 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Peter M. Chapman D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter M. Chapman sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in Canada Leader Award

Overview

Peter M. Chapman was affiliated with Golder Associates (Canada) in Canada. Their professional work was associated with this organization throughout their career.

There are no records of recent papers authored by Peter M. Chapman, and there is no information available on frequent co-authors, publication venues, book publications, main fields of study, subfields of study, or main topics of research.

There is also no information regarding awards won or specific years of recognition.

As Peter M. Chapman is deceased, all information is presented in past tense and focuses solely on the established affiliation and lack of detailed available data on publications or research topics.

Best Publications

  • Assessing sediment contamination in estuaries.

    Peter M. Chapman;Feiyue Wang

  • Ecotoxicology of metals in aquatic sediments: binding and release, bioavailability, risk assessment, and remediation

    Peter M Chapman;Feiyue Wang;Colin Janssen;Guido Persoone

  • A Sediment Quality Triad: Measures of sediment contamination, toxicity and infaunal community composition in Puget Sound

    Edward R Long;Peter M Chapman

  • The sediment quality triad approach to determining pollution-induced degradation

    Peter M. Chapman

  • Determining when contamination is pollution - weight of evidence determinations for sediments and effluents.

    Peter M. Chapman

  • A critical evaluation of safety (uncertainty) factors for ecological risk assessment

    Peter M. Chapman;Anne Fairbrother;Derek Brown

  • Integrating toxicology and ecology: putting the "eco" into ecotoxicology.

    Peter M Chapman

  • Current approaches to developing sediment quality criteria

    Peter M. Chapman

  • Sediment quality criteria from the sediment quality triad: An example

    Peter M. Chapman

  • Synoptic measures of sediment contamination, toxicity and infaunal community composition (the Sediment Quality Triad) in San Francisco Bay

    PM Chapman;RN Dexter;Er Long

  • Biological implications of sulfide in sediment—a review focusing on sediment toxicity

    Feiyue Wang;Peter M. Chapman

  • Selenium Toxicity to Aquatic Organisms

    David Janz;David DeForest;Marjorie Brooks;Peter Chapman

  • Whole effluent toxicity testing - usefulness, level of protection, and risk assessment.

    Peter M. Chapman

  • Weight-of-Evidence Issues and Frameworks for Sediment Quality (And Other) Assessments

    Peter M. Chapman;Blair G. McDonald;Gary S. Lawrence

  • A warning: NOECs are inappropriate for regulatory use

    Peter M. Chapman;Richard S. Caldwell;Peter F. Chapman

  • Relative tolerances of selected aquatic oligochaetes to individual pollutants and environmental factors

    Peter M. Chapman;Melody A. Farrell;Ralph O. Brinkhurst

  • Appropriate applications of sediment quality values for metals and metalloids

    Peter M. Chapman;Feiyue Wang;William J. Adams;Andrew Green

  • Conducting Ecological Risk Assessments of Inorganic Metals and Metalloids: Current Status

    Peter M. Chapman;Feiyue Wang;Colin R. Janssen;Richard R. Goulet

  • A Decision-Making Framework for Sediment Contamination

    Peter M. Chapman;Janette Anderson

  • Ecological Assessment of Selenium in the Aquatic Environment

    Peter M. Chapman;William J. Adams;Marjorie Brooks;Charles G. Delos

Frequent Co-Authors

Fei-Yue Wang
Fei-Yue Wang Chinese Academy of Sciences
G. Allen Burton
G. Allen Burton University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
David S. Page
David S. Page Bowdoin College
Peter F. Landrum
Peter F. Landrum Southern Illinois University Carbondale
Thomas Backhaus
Thomas Backhaus University of Gothenburg
Edward R. Long
Edward R. Long Washington Department of Ecology
Martin J. Riddle
Martin J. Riddle Australian Antarctic Division
Glenn W. Suter
Glenn W. Suter Environmental Protection Agency
Graeme E. Batley
Graeme E. Batley Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Herbert E. Allen
Herbert E. Allen University of Delaware

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can provide valuable interdisciplinary skills that enhance career prospects. Public administration plays a crucial role in environmental policy and regulation. Programs like the best online MPA programs offer focused training for managing environmental projects and public resources effectively.

Understanding societal impacts on the environment is another important aspect. An online sociology bachelor degree online empowers students with insights into social behavior, which is valuable in community-based environmental initiatives and research.

For those aiming to advance their qualifications in education with an environmental focus, online programs like EdD no dissertation options provide flexible pathways without the traditional research burden. This can accelerate career growth in academic or administrative roles.

Additionally, educators holding a master's degree can explore the seamless transition offered by EdS to EdD bridge program, which allows for continued professional development and specialization in environmental education leadership.

Best Scientists Citing Peter M. Chapman