World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
62
Citations
11426
World Ranking
2658
National Ranking
1064

Chemistry

D-Index
62
Citations
10963
World Ranking
9034
National Ranking
2555

Peter F. Landrum publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter F. Landrum sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 192 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Peter F. Landrum D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter F. Landrum sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter F. Landrum is affiliated with Southern Illinois University Carbondale in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Environmental Science, with notable work in related subfields such as Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Ecology, and Pollution.

Their recent scholarly contributions include a paper titled "Effects of temperature and salinity on bioconcentration and toxicokinetics of permethrin in pyrethroid-resistant Hyalella azteca", published in 2022 in the journal Chemosphere. This work addresses key aspects of environmental toxicology, particularly involving aquatic invertebrates and pesticide effects.

Peter F. Landrum's work concentrates on specific topical areas including:

  • Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
  • Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior
  • Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies

The scientist's collaboration network features frequent co-authors such as:

  • Andrew P. Derby
  • Kara E. Huff Hartz
  • Neil Fuller
  • John D. Reeve
  • Helen C. Poynton

The preferred publication venue for recent work includes the journal Chemosphere, reflecting engagement with interdisciplinary environmental and chemical research areas.

Best Publications

  • Reverse-phase separation method for determining pollutant binding to Aldrich humic acid and dissolved organic carbon of natural waters

    Peter F. Landrum;Sheila R. Nihart;Brian J. Eadie;Wayne S. Gardner

  • Bioavailability and toxicokinetics of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons sorbed to sediments for the amphipod Pontoporeia hoyi

    Peter F. Landrum

  • Toxicokinetics in aquatic systems: Model comparisons and use in hazard assessment

    Peter F. Landrum;Michael J. Lydy;Henry Lee

  • Predicting the bioavailability of organic xenobiotics to Pontoporeia hoyi in the presence of humic and fulvic materials and natural dissolved organic matter

    Peter F. Landrum;Mark D. Reinhold;Sheila R. Nihart;Brian J. Eadie

  • Seasonal patterns in lipid content of Lake Michigan macroinvertebrates

    Wayne S. Gardner;Thomas F. Nalepa;William A. Frez;Elizabeth A. Cichocki

  • Reduction in bioavailability of organic contaminants to the amphipod pontoporeia hoyi by dissolved organic matter of sediment interstitial waters

    Peter F. Landrum;Sheila R. Nihart;Brian J. Eadie;Lynn R. Herche

  • Toxicity and bioaccumulation of sediment-associated contaminants using freshwater invertebrates: A review of methods and applications

    Christopher G. Ingersoll;Eric L. Brunson;F. James Dwyer;Gerald T. Ankley

  • Acute mortality of anthracene-contaminated fish exposed to sunlight

    J.W. Bowling;G.J. Leversee;P.F. Landrum;J.P. Giesy

  • Toxicokinetics of organic xenobiotics in the amphipod, Pontoporeia hoyi: role of physiological and environmental variables☆

    Peter F. Landrum

  • VARIATION IN THE BIOAVAILABILITY OF POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS TO THE AMPHIPOD DIPOREIA (SPP.) WITH SEDIMENT AGING

    Peter F. Landrum;Brian J. Eadie;Warren R. Faust

  • Comparison of chemical approaches for assessing bioavailability of sediment-associated contaminants.

    Jing You;Peter F. Landrum;Michael J. Lydy

  • Comparison of whole‐sediment, elutriate and pore‐water exposures for use in assessing sediment‐associated organic contaminants in bioassays

    Gail A. Harkey;Gail A. Harkey;Peter F. Landrum;Stephen J. Klaine

  • Influence of carbon nanotubes on pyrene bioaccumulation from contaminated soils by earthworms.

    Elijah J. Petersen;Roger A. Pinto;Peter F. Landrum;Walter J. Weber

  • Toxicokinetics and toxicity of sediment‐associated pyrene to lumbriculus variegatus (oligochaeta)

    Jussi Kukkonen;Peter F. Landrum

  • Toxicokinetics and toxicity of a mixture of sediment-associated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons to the amphipod Diporeia sp

    Peter F. Landrum;Brian J. Eadie;Warren R. Faust

  • Passive sampling methods for contaminated sediments: State of the science for organic contaminants†

    Michael J. Lydy;Peter F. Landrum;Amy M. P. Oen;Mayumi Allinson

  • Uptake, depuration, and biotransformation of anthracene and benzo[a]pyrene in bluegill sunfish

    Anne Spacie;Peter F. Landrum;Gordon J. Leversee

  • Humic Acids Reduce Bioaccumulation of Some Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons

    G. J. Leversee;P. F. Landrum;J. P. Giesy;T. Fannin

  • THREE-PHASE PARTITIONING OF HYDROPHOBIC ORGANIC COMPOUNDS IN GREAT LAKES WATERS

    Brian J. Eadie;Nancy R. Morehead;Peter F. Landrum

  • Bioaccumulation and critical body residue of PAHs in the amphipod, Diporeia spp: additional evidence to support toxicity additivity for PAH mixtures.

    Peter F. Landrum;Guilherme R. Lotufo;Duane C. Gossiaux;Michelle L. Gedeon

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael J. Lydy
Michael J. Lydy Southern Illinois University Carbondale
Jussi V. K. Kukkonen
Jussi V. K. Kukkonen University of Eastern Finland
Brian J. Eadie
Brian J. Eadie Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory
John P. Giesy
John P. Giesy University of Saskatchewan
Jing You
Jing You Jinan University
Peter M. Chapman
Peter M. Chapman Golder Associates (Canada)
David S. Page
David S. Page Bowdoin College
G. Allen Burton
G. Allen Burton University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Christopher G. Ingersoll
Christopher G. Ingersoll United States Geological Survey
Stephen J. Klaine
Stephen J. Klaine Clemson University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can broaden career opportunities. Many opt for affordable programs, and the best affordable online general studies degree programs provide a flexible and cost-effective foundation that can complement specialized environmental knowledge.

If you seek a less demanding academic path that still opens doors in environmental fields, consider reviewing options under the easiest bachelor's degree. These programs often balance simplicity with valuable skills employers recognize.

Specialized degrees such as online geology can significantly enhance understanding of Earth systems. The geology degrees online offer focused study on soil, rock formations, and environmental impacts that are crucial for many environmental science roles.

Additionally, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) expertise is increasingly sought after in environmental careers. Explore the best GIS graduate programs to gain skills in mapping, spatial analysis, and data management that directly support environmental decision-making.

Best Scientists Citing Peter F. Landrum

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles