World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
43
Citations
7134
World Ranking
7095
National Ranking
2534

Brian J. Eadie publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brian J. Eadie sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 93 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Brian J. Eadie D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brian J. Eadie sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Brian J. Eadie is affiliated with the Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory in the United States. Their work is connected to environmental research with a likely focus on the Great Lakes region, although specific fields of study, topics, or subfields are not detailed in the available data.

No recent papers or frequent co-authors are listed, which limits insight into the scope or impact of their published research. Similarly, there is no information on frequent publication venues or book publications associated with this scientist.

The absence of data on main fields, subfields, or topics of study suggests that detailed information on their academic focus is not available or has not been recorded in the provided sources.

No awards or recognitions have been documented, indicating either that none have been received or that this information is not currently accessible.

This profile is based solely on verified affiliations and the absence of additional bibliographic or research details, implying that Brian J. Eadie's professional contributions might be primarily internal to their institution or otherwise not publicly catalogued.

Best Publications

  • Reverse-phase separation method for determining pollutant binding to Aldrich humic acid and dissolved organic carbon of natural waters

    Peter F. Landrum;Sheila R. Nihart;Brian J. Eadie;Wayne S. Gardner

  • Sediment Trap Fluxes and Benthic Recycling of Organic Carbon, Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons, and Polychlorobiphenyl Congeners in Lake Superior

    Joel E. Baker;Steven J. Eisenreich;Brian J. Eadie

  • Sources, degradation and recycling of organic matter associated with sinking particles in Lake Michigan

    Philip A. Meyers;Brian J. Eadie

  • Sediment Trap Studies in Lake Michigan: Resuspension and Chemical Fluxes in the Southern Basin

    Brian J. Eadie;Richard L. Chambers;Wayne S. Gardner;Gerald L. Bell

  • Predicting the bioavailability of organic xenobiotics to Pontoporeia hoyi in the presence of humic and fulvic materials and natural dissolved organic matter

    Peter F. Landrum;Mark D. Reinhold;Sheila R. Nihart;Brian J. Eadie

  • Reduction in bioavailability of organic contaminants to the amphipod pontoporeia hoyi by dissolved organic matter of sediment interstitial waters

    Peter F. Landrum;Sheila R. Nihart;Brian J. Eadie;Lynn R. Herche

  • Satellite observations of calcium carbonate precipitations in the Great Lakes1

    Alan E. Strong;Brian J. Eadie

  • Perylene: an indicator of alteration processes or precursor materials?

    James E. Silliman;Philip A. Meyers;Brian J. Eadie

  • VARIATION IN THE BIOAVAILABILITY OF POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS TO THE AMPHIPOD DIPOREIA (SPP.) WITH SEDIMENT AGING

    Peter F. Landrum;Brian J. Eadie;Warren R. Faust

  • Records of nutrient-enhanced coastal ocean productivity in sediments from the Louisiana continental shelf

    Brian J. Eadie;Brent A. McKee;Margaret B. Lansing;John A. Robbins

  • Toxicokinetics and toxicity of a mixture of sediment-associated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons to the amphipod Diporeia sp

    Peter F. Landrum;Brian J. Eadie;Warren R. Faust

  • Transport of Particulate Organic Carbon by the Mississippi River and Its Fate in the Gulf of Mexico

    John H. Trefry;Simone Metz;Terry A. Nelsen;Robert P. Trocine

  • A model study of the coupled biological and physical dynamics in Lake Michigan

    Changsheng Chen;Rubao Ji;David J. Schwab;Dmitry Beletsky

  • Continued disappearance of the benthic amphipod Diporeia spp. in Lake Michigan: is there evidence for food limitation?

    Thomas F Nalepa;David L Fanslow;Andrew J Foley;Gregory A Lang

  • Insights into the origin of perylene from isotopic analyses of sediments from Saanich Inlet, British Columbia

    J.E Silliman;P.A Meyers;P.H Ostrom;N.E Ostrom

  • THREE-PHASE PARTITIONING OF HYDROPHOBIC ORGANIC COMPOUNDS IN GREAT LAKES WATERS

    Brian J. Eadie;Nancy R. Morehead;Peter F. Landrum

  • The Role of Particulate Matter in the Movement of Contaminants in the Great Lakes

    Brian J. Eadie;John A. Robbins

  • δ13C analyses of oceanic particulate organic matter

    Unknown

  • Lake Erie hypoxia prompts Canada‐U.S. study

    Nathan Hawley;Thomas H. Johengen;Yerubandi R. Rao;Steven A. Ruberg

  • Community metabolism and nutrient cycling in the Mississippi River plume: evidence for intense nitrification at intermediate salinities

    JD Pakulski;P. Benner;R. Amon;B. Eadie

  • The sorption of PAH onto dissolved organic matter in Lake Michigan waters

    Nancy R. Morehead;Brian J. Eadie;Brian Lake;Peter F. Landrum

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter F. Landrum
Peter F. Landrum Southern Illinois University Carbondale
John A. Robbins
John A. Robbins Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory
Wayne S. Gardner
Wayne S. Gardner The University of Texas at Austin
Philip A. Meyers
Philip A. Meyers University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Thomas H. Johengen
Thomas H. Johengen University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
David J. Schwab
David J. Schwab Michigan Technological University
Henry A. Vanderploeg
Henry A. Vanderploeg National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Dmitry Beletsky
Dmitry Beletsky University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
James B. Cotner
James B. Cotner University of Minnesota
Jussi V. K. Kukkonen
Jussi V. K. Kukkonen University of Eastern Finland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in studying Environmental Sciences in the USA, various related online degrees can provide valuable knowledge and skills. Many students opt for easy bachelor degrees as a stepping stone to build a strong educational foundation while balancing other commitments.

Specializations such as geology are highly relevant, and pursuing one of the online geology degrees can equip students with an understanding of earth processes that is crucial for environmental work. Similarly, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) expertise is increasingly in demand; exploring top gis degree programs allows learners to gain proficiency in spatial data analysis and mapping skills essential for environmental planning.

On the career advancement front, environmental professionals often benefit from public administration knowledge. Accelerated formats like the mpa one year programs provide an efficient path to leadership roles, blending policy, management, and environmental expertise.

Choosing the right online degree aligned with your career goals ensures you stay competitive in the evolving environmental field while accommodating your personal schedule and learning preferences.

Best Scientists Citing Brian J. Eadie

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles