World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
68
Citations
15888
World Ranking
1878
National Ranking
786

Donald Scavia publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Donald Scavia sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 212 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Donald Scavia D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Donald Scavia sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Donald Scavia is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with a notable emphasis on soil and water nutrient dynamics, hydrology and watershed management studies, and aquatic ecosystems and phytoplankton dynamics.

Scavia's main fields of study include:

  • Environmental Science

Within this broad field, their work spans several subfields such as:

  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Water Science and Technology
  • Ecology
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation

The key topics covered by their research include:

  • Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
  • Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
  • Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
  • Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior
  • Marine and Coastal Ecosystems
  • Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes

Recent papers by Scavia illustrate their focus on watershed modeling and ecological forecasts. Notable publications include:

  • Advancing estuarine ecological forecasts: seasonal hypoxia in Chesapeake Bay, 2021, Ecological Applications
  • Evaluating management options to reduce Lake Erie algal blooms using an ensemble of watershed models, 2020, Journal of Environmental Management
  • Simulating internal watershed processes using multiple SWAT models, 2020, The Science of The Total Environment
  • Uncertainty in critical source area predictions from watershed-scale hydrologic models, 2020, Journal of Environmental Management
  • Bias correction of climate model outputs influences watershed model nutrient load predictions, 2020, The Science of The Total Environment

Scavia frequently collaborates with various researchers. Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Margaret Kalcic
  • Anna Apostel
  • Rebecca Logsdon Muenich
  • Jay F. Martin
  • Grey R. Evenson

Their research is extensively published in several journals known within the environmental sciences community, including:

  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Journal of Great Lakes Research
  • Journal of Environmental Management
  • Environmental Science & Technology
  • Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management

Best Publications

  • Record-setting algal bloom in Lake Erie caused by agricultural and meteorological trends consistent with expected future conditions

    Anna M Michalak;Eric J Anderson;Dimitry Beletsky;Steven Boland

  • Climate Change Impacts on U.S. Coastal and Marine Ecosystems

    Donald Scavia;John C. Field;Donald F. Boesch;Robert W. Buddemeier

  • Beyond Science into Policy: Gulf of Mexico Hypoxia and the Mississippi River

    Nancy N. Rabalais;R. Eugene Turner;Donald Scavia

  • Assessing and addressing the re-eutrophication of Lake Erie: Central basin hypoxia

    Donald Scavia;J. David Allan;Kristin K. Arend;Steven Bartell

  • Two Electivity Indices for Feeding with Special Reference to Zooplankton Grazing

    H. A. Vanderploeg;D. Scavia

  • Calculation and use of selectivity coefficients of feeding: Zooplankton grazing

    Henry A. Vanderploeg;Donald Scavia

  • Predicting the response of Gulf of Mexico hypoxia to variations in Mississippi River nitrogen load

    Donald Scavia;Nancy N. Rabalais;R. Eugene Turner;Dubravko Justić

  • Influence of Salmonine Predation and Weather on Long-Term Water Quality Trends in Lake Michigan

    Donald Scavia;Gary L. Fahnenstiel;Marlene S. Evans;David J. Jude

  • Bacterioplankton in Lake Michigan: Dynamics, controls, and significance to carbon flux1

    Donald Scavia;Gwenyth A. Laird

  • Recent changes in primary production and phytoplankton in the offshore region of southeastern Lake Michigan

    G. Fahnenstiel;S. Pothoven;H. Vanderploeg;D. Klarer

  • Seasonal and interannual effects of hypoxia on fish habitat quality in central Lake Erie

    Kristin K. Arend;Kristin K. Arend;Dmitry Beletsky;Joseph V. DePINTO;Stuart A. Ludsin

  • Microscale patchiness of nutrients in plankton communities.

    John T. Lehman;Donald Scavia

  • Evaluating Causes of Trends in Long-Term Dissolved Reactive Phosphorus Loads to Lake Erie

    Irem Daloğlu;Kyung Hwa Cho;Donald Scavia

  • Coastal eutrophication assessment in the United States

    Donald Scavia;Suzanne B. Bricker

  • Interacting effects of climate change and agricultural BMPs on nutrient runoff entering Lake Erie

    Nathan S. Bosch;Mary Anne Evans;Donald Scavia;J. David Allan

  • Spatial and Temporal Trends in Lake Erie Hypoxia, 1987−2007

    Yuntao Zhou;Yuntao Zhou;Daniel R. Obenour;Donald Scavia;Thomas H. Johengen

  • Using a Bayesian hierarchical model to improve Lake Erie cyanobacteria bloom forecasts

    Daniel R. Obenour;Andrew D. Gronewold;Craig A. Stow;Donald Scavia

  • Scenario-testing of agricultural best management practices in Lake Erie watersheds

    Nathan S. Bosch;J. David Allan;James P. Selegean;Donald Scavia

  • Multiple models guide strategies for agricultural nutrient reductions

    Donald Scavia;Margaret Kalcic;Margaret Kalcic;Rebecca Logsdon Muenich;Jennifer Read

  • Moving Climate Information off the Shelf: Boundary Chains and the Role of RISAs as Adaptive Organizations

    Maria Carmen Lemos;Christine J. Kirchhoff;Scott E. Kalafatis;Donald Scavia

  • Importance of Picoplankton in Lake Superior

    Gary L. Fahnenstiel;Linda Sicko-Goad;Donald Scavia;Eugene F. Stoermer

  • Reducing hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico: Advice from three models

    Donald Scavia;Dubravko Justic;Victor J. Bierman

Frequent Co-Authors

Gary L. Fahnenstiel
Gary L. Fahnenstiel Michigan Technological University
Anna M. Michalak
Anna M. Michalak Stanford University
Henry A. Vanderploeg
Henry A. Vanderploeg National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Irena F. Creed
Irena F. Creed University of Toronto
Dubravko Justic
Dubravko Justic Louisiana State University
Craig A. Stow
Craig A. Stow National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
James F. Kitchell
James F. Kitchell University of Wisconsin–Madison
David J. Schwab
David J. Schwab Michigan Technological University
Thomas H. Johengen
Thomas H. Johengen University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Dmitry Beletsky
Dmitry Beletsky University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens a variety of career pathways that often intersect with other disciplines. For instance, a blend of public administration knowledge can enhance your impact in environmental policy and advocacy. Exploring a one year mpa can equip you with the leadership skills needed to manage environmental programs within government or non-profit sectors efficiently.

Additionally, understanding societal behaviors and structures is crucial for effective environmental solutions. Pursuing the best online bachelor degree in sociology helps students appreciate community dynamics, which is vital for designing sustainable initiatives tailored to diverse populations.

For those interested in advancing their educational trajectory, there are flexible options like edd without dissertation programs. These are designed for professionals seeking to deepen their knowledge without the extended commitment of traditional research, enabling quicker transitions into leadership or educational roles related to environmental education.

Moreover, the pathway from an educational specialist degree (EdS) to a Doctor of Education (EdD) can be pursued through top institutions offering comprehensive eds to edd programs online. This progression supports long-term career growth in academia, administration, or policy-making with a focus on environmental challenges.

Best Scientists Citing Donald Scavia

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles