World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
55
Citations
8438
World Ranking
3924
National Ranking
1494

David J. Schwab publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David J. Schwab sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 175 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

David J. Schwab D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David J. Schwab sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

David J. Schwab is affiliated with Michigan Technological University in the United States. Their academic profile includes a focus on research and scholarship, though specific details on research topics, recent papers, and publication venues are not listed.

There is no available data on co-authors or frequent collaborators in their research endeavors. Similarly, information on book publications or specific awards associated with their career is not documented.

The profile lacks details regarding main fields of study, subfields, or primary research topics. Likewise, there are no records of recent papers, including titles, publication years, or venues, that could provide insight into their scientific contributions.

The information indicates that David J. Schwab is currently living. Due to the limited data, this profile focuses on confirmed academic affiliation and general facts without speculation on research themes or scholarly achievements.

Best Publications

  • Assessing and addressing the re-eutrophication of Lake Erie: Central basin hypoxia

    Donald Scavia;J. David Allan;Kristin K. Arend;Steven Bartell

  • Mean Circulation in the Great Lakes

    Dmitry Beletsky;James H. Saylor;David J. Schwab

  • Massive microbiological groundwater contamination associated with a waterborne outbreak in Lake Erie, South Bass Island, Ohio.

    Theng Theng Fong;Linda S. Mansfield;David L. Wilson;David J. Schwab

  • Modeling circulation and thermal structure in Lake Michigan: Annual cycle and interannual variability

    Dmitry Beletsky;David J. Schwab

  • Transport and Mixing Between the Coastal and Offshore Waters in the Great Lakes: a Review

    Yerubandi R. Rao;David J. Schwab

  • Seasonal and interannual effects of hypoxia on fish habitat quality in central Lake Erie

    Kristin K. Arend;Kristin K. Arend;Dmitry Beletsky;Joseph V. DePINTO;Stuart A. Ludsin

  • Application of a simple numerical wave prediction model to Lake Erie

    David J. Schwab;John R. Bennett;Paul C. Liu;Mark A. Donelan

  • Modeling the transport and inactivation of E. coli and enterococci in the near-shore region of Lake Michigan.

    Lubo Liu;Mantha S. Phanikumar;Stephanie L. Molloy;Richard L. Whitman

  • A model of sediment resuspension and transport dynamics in southern Lake Michigan

    Jing Lou;David J. Schwab;Dmitry Beletsky;Nathan Hawley

  • A model study of the coupled biological and physical dynamics in Lake Michigan

    Changsheng Chen;Rubao Ji;David J. Schwab;Dmitry Beletsky

  • Evolution of a cyanobacterial bloom forecast system in western Lake Erie: Development and initial evaluation

    Timothy T. Wynne;Richard P. Stumpf;Michelle C. Tomlinson;Gary L. Fahnenstiel

  • Modeling the 1998–2003 summer circulation and thermal structure in Lake Michigan

    Dmitry Beletsky;David Schwab;Michael McCormick

  • Initial Implementation of the Great Lakes Forecasting System: A Real-Time System for Predicting Lake Circulation and Thermal Structure

    D.J. Schwab;K.W. Bedford

  • Modeling 1993–2008 climatology of seasonal general circulation and thermal structure in the Great Lakes using FVCOM

    Xuezhi Bai;Jia Wang;David J. Schwab;Yi Yang

  • Lake Erie hypoxia prompts Canada‐U.S. study

    Nathan Hawley;Thomas H. Johengen;Yerubandi R. Rao;Steven A. Ruberg

  • Automated Mapping of Surface Water Temperature in the Great Lakes

    David J. Schwab;George A. Leshkevich;Glenn C. Muhr

  • Classifying and Forecasting Coastal Upwellings in Lake Michigan Using Satellite Derived Temperature Images and Buoy Data

    Stefan Plattner;Doran M. Mason;George A. Leshkevich;David J. Schwab

  • Biophysical Model of Larval Yellow Perch Advection and Settlement in Lake Michigan

    Dmitry Beletsky;Doran M. Mason;David J. Schwab;Edward S. Rutherford

  • Numerical Simulation of Internal Kelvin Waves and Coastal Upwelling Fronts

    Dmitry Beletsky;William P. O’Connor;David J. Schwab;David E. Dietrich

  • On the growth rate of wind‐generated waves

    M. Donelan;M. Skafel;Hans C Graber;P. Liu

  • Environmental Science & Technology, es060438k (2006) Modeling the Transport and Inactivation of E. coli and Enterococci in the Near-Shore Region of Lake Michigan

    Lubo Liu;Mantha S. Phanikumar;Stephanie L. Molloy;Richard L. Whitman

Frequent Co-Authors

Dmitry Beletsky
Dmitry Beletsky University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Brian J. Eadie
Brian J. Eadie Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory
Henry A. Vanderploeg
Henry A. Vanderploeg National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Donald Scavia
Donald Scavia University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Gary L. Fahnenstiel
Gary L. Fahnenstiel Michigan Technological University
Thomas H. Johengen
Thomas H. Johengen University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Jia Wang
Jia Wang Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory
Doran M. Mason
Doran M. Mason National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
James B. Cotner
James B. Cotner University of Minnesota
Richard L. Whitman
Richard L. Whitman United States Geological Survey

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences often opens doors to diverse career pathways that integrate science, policy, and community engagement. For those looking to advance their expertise, exploring options like eds to edd programs online can be beneficial. These programs focus on leadership and research skills, relevant for environmental education and advocacy roles.

Career options in social work and community outreach related to environmental justice are also emerging fields. Students may find value in fully funded dsw programs online, which prepare professionals to address social impacts of environmental issues.

For those seeking flexible and cost-effective educational routes, a low cost online general studies degree can provide a broad interdisciplinary foundation, accommodating environmental science studies alongside other interests.

Additionally, some students may prioritize balancing ease of study with career goals. Exploring the easiest bachelor's degree options online can help in selecting programs that offer manageable coursework and support, enabling steady progress in environmental science careers.

Best Scientists Citing David J. Schwab

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles