World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
58
Citations
13008
World Ranking
3249
National Ranking
1254

Richard P. Stumpf publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard P. Stumpf sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 152 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Richard P. Stumpf D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard P. Stumpf sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard P. Stumpf is affiliated with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in the United States. Their research primarily spans environmental science and earth and planetary sciences, with a strong focus on subfields such as environmental chemistry, oceanography, ecology, water science and technology, and earth-surface processes.

The scientist's work covers several main topics, including marine and coastal ecosystems, aquatic ecosystems and phytoplankton dynamics, soil and water nutrient dynamics, water quality and pollution assessment, coastal and marine dynamics, water quality monitoring and analysis, and remote sensing and LiDAR applications.

Frequent publication venues for their research include Remote Sensing, Harmful Algae, Remote Sensing of Environment, Ecological Indicators, and The Science of The Total Environment. The scientist has contributed extensively to these journals, reflecting a consistent engagement with environmental and aquatic ecosystem studies.

Richard P. Stumpf has collaborated repeatedly with several other researchers in the field. Frequent co-authors include Blake A. Schaeffer, P. Jeremy Werdell, Andrew Meredith, Isabel Caballero, and Keith A. Loftin, each contributing to multiple joint publications.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Stumpf demonstrate a concentration on remote sensing applications for water quality and ecosystem monitoring. Selected recent publications include:

  • Seamless retrievals of chlorophyll-a from Sentinel-2 (MSI) and Sentinel-3 (OLCI) in inland and coastal waters: A machine-learning approach, 2020, Remote Sensing of Environment
  • Towards Routine Mapping of Shallow Bathymetry in Environments with Variable Turbidity: Contribution of Sentinel-2A/B Satellites Mission, 2020, Remote Sensing
  • Satellites for long-term monitoring of inland U.S. lakes: The MERIS time series and application for chlorophyll-a, 2021, Remote Sensing of Environment
  • Current and Future Remote Sensing of Harmful Algal Blooms in the Chesapeake Bay to Support the Shellfish Industry, 2020, Frontiers in Marine Science
  • Advancing cyanobacteria biomass estimation from hyperspectral observations: Demonstrations with HICO and PRISMA imagery, 2021, Remote Sensing of Environment

Best Publications

  • Determination of water depth with high-resolution satellite imagery over variable bottom types

    Richard P. Stumpf;Kristine Holderied;Mark Sinclair

  • The process of sedimentation on the surface of a salt marsh

    Richard P. Stumpf

  • Interannual Variability of Cyanobacterial Blooms in Lake Erie

    Richard P. Stumpf;Timothy T. Wynne;David B. Baker;Gary L. Fahnenstiel

  • Seamless retrievals of chlorophyll-a from Sentinel-2 (MSI) and Sentinel-3 (OLCI) in inland and coastal waters: A machine-learning approach

    Nima Pahlevan;Brandon Smith;John Schalles;Caren Binding

  • MONITORING KARENIA BREVIS BLOOMS IN THE GULF OF MEXICO USING SATELLITE OCEAN COLOR IMAGERY AND OTHER DATA

    R.P. Stumpf;M.E. Culver;P.A. Tester;M. Tomlinson

  • Remote sensing of coral reefs and their physical environment.

    Peter J. Mumby;William Skirving;Alan E. Strong;John T. Hardy

  • Performance metrics for the assessment of satellite data products: an ocean color case study.

    Bridget N. Seegers;Richard P. Stumpf;Blake A. Schaeffer;Keith A. Loftin

  • Relating spectral shape to cyanobacterial blooms in the Laurentian Great Lakes

    T. T. Wynne;R. P. Stumpf;M. C. Tomlinson;R. A. Warner

  • Characterizing a cyanobacterial bloom in Western Lake Erie using satellite imagery and meteorological data

    Timothy T. Wynne;Richard P. Stumpf;Michelle C. Tomlinson;Julianne Dyble

  • Global solutions to regional problems: Collecting global expertise to address the problem of harmful cyanobacterial blooms. A Lake Erie case study.

    George S. Bullerjahn;Robert M. McKay;Timothy W. Davis;David B. Baker

  • SEA-LEVEL RISE AND COASTAL FOREST RETREAT ON THE WEST COAST OF FLORIDA, USA

    Kimberlyn Williams;Katherine C. Ewel;Richard P. Stumpf;Francis E. Putz

  • Calibration of a general optical equation for remote sensing of suspended sediments in a moderately turbid estuary

    Richard P. Stumpf;Johnathan R. Pennock

  • Ecophysiological Examination of the Lake Erie Microcystis Bloom in 2014: Linkages between Biology and the Water Supply Shutdown of Toledo, OH

    Morgan M. Steffen;Timothy W. Davis;R. Michael L. McKay;George S. Bullerjahn

  • An expatriate red tide bloom: Transport, distribution, and persistence

    Patricia A. Tester;Richard P. Stumpf;Fred M. Vukovich;Patricia K. Fowler

  • Evaluation of the use of SeaWiFS imagery for detecting Karenia brevis harmful algal blooms in the eastern Gulf of Mexico

    Michelle C Tomlinson;Richard P Stumpf;Varis Ransibrahmanakul;Earnest W Truby

  • Forecasting annual cyanobacterial bloom biomass to inform management decisions in Lake Erie

    Richard P. Stumpf;Laura T. Johnson;Timothy T. Wynne;David B. Baker

  • Challenges for mapping cyanotoxin patterns from remote sensing of cyanobacteria

    Richard P. Stumpf;Timothy W. Davis;Timothy T. Wynne;Jennifer L. Graham

  • Relating chlorophyll from cyanobacteria-dominated inland waters to a MERIS bloom index

    Michelle C. Tomlinson;Richard P. Stumpf;Timothy T. Wynne;Danielle Dupuy

  • Satellite monitoring of cyanobacterial harmful algal bloom frequency in recreational waters and drinking water sources

    John M. Clark;Blake A. Schaeffer;John A. Darling;Erin A. Urquhart

  • Applications of Satellite Ocean Color Sensors for Monitoring and Predicting Harmful Algal Blooms

    Richard P. Stumpf

  • Retrieval of nearshore bathymetry from Sentinel-2A and 2B satellites in South Florida coastal waters

    Isabel Caballero;Richard P. Stumpf

  • Satellite detection of bloom and pigment distributions in estuaries

    Richard P. Stumpf;Mary A. Tyler

Frequent Co-Authors

P. Jeremy Werdell
P. Jeremy Werdell Goddard Space Flight Center
Patricia A. Tester
Patricia A. Tester Ocean Tester LLC
Anna M. Michalak
Anna M. Michalak Stanford University
Hongxing Liu
Hongxing Liu University of Alabama
Raphael M. Kudela
Raphael M. Kudela University of California, Santa Cruz
Gregory L. Boyer
Gregory L. Boyer SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry
Steven W. Wilhelm
Steven W. Wilhelm University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Thomas H. Johengen
Thomas H. Johengen University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Hans W. Paerl
Hans W. Paerl University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
R. Wayne Litaker
R. Wayne Litaker National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens up diverse career paths that often intersect with related fields. For those interested in earth processes and physical landscapes, pursuing geology degrees online offers flexibility and in-depth knowledge of geological systems essential for environmental assessment and conservation.

Another growing area is Geographic Information Systems (GIS), which plays a crucial role in managing environmental data and mapping. Exploring the best gis graduate programs can equip students with technical skills needed for spatial analysis and decision-making in environmental management.

For those interested in policy and administration related to environmental issues, online public administration degrees provide practical knowledge. Some students may find easiest online mpa programs appealing to enhance their leadership and management capabilities efficiently.

Lastly, the social dimensions of environmental challenges highlight the importance of understanding human behavior and society. Pursuing an online bachelors in sociology can deepen insights into community dynamics and support more effective environmental advocacy.

Best Scientists Citing Richard P. Stumpf

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles