World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Business and Management

D-Index
39
Citations
12371
World Ranking
1721
National Ranking
718

Lawrence A. Gordon publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lawrence A. Gordon sits on this spectrum.

35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientists 435 publications: 1 scientists 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35 publications 436+

This scientist: 92 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

Lawrence A. Gordon D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lawrence A. Gordon sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lawrence A. Gordon is affiliated with the University of Maryland, College Park in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Computer Science and Business, Management and Accounting. Within these areas, their focus lies notably on Information Systems and related subfields.

The main topics they have explored include Information and Cyber Security, Network Security and Intrusion Detection, Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies, Auditing, Earnings Management, and Governance. They have also contributed to research on Financial Markets and Investment Strategies, Financial Reporting and Valuation Research, and Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies.

Frequent venues for their publications show a pattern of interdisciplinary work across cybersecurity, accounting, and information security domains. These venues include:

  • Journal of Information Security
  • Open Journal of Accounting
  • Transactions on Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence
  • Journal of Cybersecurity
  • Journal of Accounting and Public Policy

Some of their recent papers are:

  • "Integrating cost-benefit analysis into the NIST Cybersecurity Framework via the Gordon-Loeb Model," 2020, Journal of Cybersecurity
  • "Empirical evidence on disclosing cyber breaches in an 8-K report: Initial exploratory evidence," 2024, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy
  • "Information Segmentation and Investing in Cybersecurity," 2021, Journal of Information Security

They have collaborated extensively with several co-authors, most notably:

  • Martin P. Loeb
  • Lei Zhou
  • Chih-Yang Tseng
  • Josiah Dykstra
  • Amanda L. Wilford

Their research contributions have addressed topics that intersect both technical and managerial aspects of cybersecurity, with attention to economic and policy considerations such as cost-benefit analyses and disclosure practices.

Best Publications

  • The economics of information security investment

    Lawrence A. Gordon;Martin P. Loeb

  • Management accounting systems, perceived environmental uncertainty and organization structure: An empirical investigation☆

    Lawrence A. Gordon;V.K. Narayanan

  • The economic cost of publicly announced information security breaches: empirical evidence from the stock market

    Katherine Campbell;Lawrence A. Gordon;Martin P. Loeb;Lei Zhou

  • A contingency framework for the design of accounting information systems

    Lawrence A. Gordon;Danny Miller

  • Enterprise risk management and firm performance: A contingency perspective

    Lawrence A. Gordon;Martin P. Loeb;Chih-Yang Tseng

  • Information overload: A temporal approach☆

    Allen G. Schick;Lawrence A. Gordon;Susan Haka

  • Sharing information on computer systems security: An economic analysis

    Lawrence A. Gordon;Martin P. Loeb;William Lucyshyn

  • A framework for using insurance for cyber-risk management

    Lawrence A. Gordon;Martin P. Loeb;Tashfeen Sohail

  • The impact of IFRS adoption on foreign direct investment

    Lawrence A. Gordon;Martin P. Loeb;Wenjie Zhu

  • Evaluating information security investments using the analytic hierarchy process

    Lawrence D. Bodin;Lawrence A. Gordon;Martin P. Loeb

  • Managing Cybersecurity Resources: A Cost-Benefit Analysis

    Lawrence A. Gordon;Martin P. Loeb

  • The impact of information security breaches: Has there been a downward shift in costs?

    Lawrence A. Gordon;Martin P. Loeb;Lei Zhou

  • Market value of voluntary disclosures concerning information security

    Lawrence A. Gordon;Martin P. Loeb;Tashfeen Sohail

  • Budgeting process for information security expenditures

    Lawrence A. Gordon;Martin P. Loeb

  • The impact of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act on the corporate disclosures of information security activities

    Lawrence A. Gordon;Martin P. Loeb;William Lucyshyn;Tashfeen Sohail

  • ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS

    Lawrence D. Bodin;Lawrence A. Gordon;Martin P. Loeb

  • Sophisticated capital budgeting selection techniques and firm performance

    Susan F. Haka;Lawrence A. Gordon;George E. Pinches

  • Accounting and Stock Price Performance in Dynamic CEO Compensation Arrangements

    John F. Boschen;Augustine Duru;Lawrence A. Gordon;Kimberly J. Smith

  • Information Security Expenditures and Real Options: A Wait-and-See Approach

    Lawrence A. Gordon;Martin P. Loeb;William Lucyshyn

  • The impact of information sharing on cybersecurity underinvestment: A real options perspective

    Lawrence A. Gordon;Martin P. Loeb;William Lucyshyn;Lei Zhou

  • MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING SYSTEMS, PERCEIVED ENVIRONMENTAL UNCERTAINTY AND ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE: AN...

    Lawrence A. Gordon;V.K. Narayanan

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin P. Loeb
Martin P. Loeb University of Maryland, College Park
Virginia L. Miller
Virginia L. Miller University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Martin Eling
Martin Eling University of St. Gallen
David F. Larcker
David F. Larcker Stanford University
Allen Schick
Allen Schick University of Maryland, College Park
Henry Mintzberg
Henry Mintzberg McGill University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a flexible route into Business and Management? Online degrees now offer more affordable and convenient options than ever. For students who want to graduate faster, accelerated programs can help you finish your coursework in a reduced time frame, saving both time and tuition costs.

Budget is a key concern for many learners. If you're looking for the cheapest business administration degree online, there are plenty of accredited universities that offer high-value programs without high fees.

For those interested in leadership roles in healthcare, healthcare administration degrees provide a focused curriculum at both undergraduate and graduate levels. If you’re aiming for advanced positions, finding the cheapest mha online programs can help you obtain a master's degree in healthcare administration at a fraction of traditional costs.

With so many affordable online degree pathways, it's easier than ever to align your education with your career goals in business or healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Lawrence A. Gordon

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles