World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
45
Citations
11670
World Ranking
7061
National Ranking
57

Rainer Böhme publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rainer Böhme sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 175 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Rainer Böhme D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rainer Böhme sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Rainer Böhme is affiliated with the University of Innsbruck in Austria and has contributed extensively to research in computer science, with a particular focus on information systems, artificial intelligence, and computer vision. Their work spans into interdisciplinary areas including sociology, political science, and finance.

The scientist's recent publications cover various topics such as decentralized cryptocurrency exchanges, synthetic visual perception, privacy preference signals, and cyber insurance economics. Among notable papers are:

  • The Rise of Decentralized Cryptocurrency Exchanges: Evaluating the Role of Airdrops and Governance Tokens, 2023, Journal of Corporate Finance
  • More Real Than Real: A Study on Human Visual Perception of Synthetic Faces [Applications Corner], 2021, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine
  • The Rise of Decentralized Cryptocurrency Exchanges: Evaluating the Role of Airdrops and Governance Tokens, 2021, SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Privacy Preference Signals: Past, Present and Future, 2021, Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies
  • Economics of incident response panels in cyber insurance, 2024, Computers & Security

Böhme's frequent collaborators include Daniel Woods, Pietro Saggese, Alessandro Belmonte, Nicola Dimitri, and Angelo Facchini. These collaborations reflect a breadth of research connections across the field of computer science.

The primary publication venues for Böhme's research encompass both preprint and peer-reviewed journals, including:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Computers & Security
  • Communications of the ACM
  • IEEE Security & Privacy

The scientist's research focuses on several main topics, detailing both theoretical and applied aspects within computer science:

  • Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
  • Digital Media Forensic Detection
  • Advanced Malware Detection Techniques
  • Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
  • Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data

Best Publications

  • Bitcoin: economics, technology, and governance

    Rainer Böhme;Nicolas Christin;Benjamin Edelman;Tyler Moore

  • The 'Dresden Image Database' for benchmarking digital image forensics

    Thomas Gloe;Rainer Böhme

  • Measuring the Cost of Cybercrime

    Ross Anderson;Chris Barton;Rainer Böhme;Richard Clayton

  • An inquiry into money laundering tools in the Bitcoin ecosystem

    Malte Moser;Rainer Bohme;Dominic Breuker

  • The Challenges of Personal Data Markets and Privacy

    Sarah Spiekermann;Alessandro Acquisti;Rainer Böhme;Kai Lung Hui

  • Moving steganography and steganalysis from the laboratory into the real world

    Andrew D. Ker;Patrick Bas;Rainer Böhme;Rémi Cogranne

  • Modeling Cyber-Insurance: Towards A Unifying Framework

    Rainer Böhme;Galina Schwartz

  • Can we trust digital image forensics

    Thomas Gloe;Matthias Kirchner;Antje Winkler;Rainer Böhme

  • Perceived Benefit and Risk as Multidimensional Determinants of Bitcoin Use: A Quantitative Exploratory Study

    Svetlana Abramova;Rainer Böhme

  • Hiding Traces of Resampling in Digital Images

    M. Kirchner;R. Bohme

  • Revisiting weighted stego-image steganalysis

    Andrew D. Ker;Rainer Böhme

  • Models and Measures for Correlation in Cyber-Insurance

    Rainer Böhme;Gaurav Kataria

  • Trained to accept?: a field experiment on consent dialogs

    Rainer Böhme;Stefan Köpsell

  • Exploiting preserved statistics for steganalysis

    Rainer Böhme;Andreas Westfeld

  • Counter-Forensics: Attacking Image Forensics

    Rainer Böhme;Matthias Kirchner

  • Trends, Tips, Tolls: A Longitudinal Study of Bitcoin Transaction Fees

    Malte Möser;Rainer Böhme

  • Multiple Purposes, Multiple Problems: A User Study of Consent Dialogs after GDPR

    Dominique Machuletz;Rainer Böhme

  • Advanced Statistical Steganalysis

    Rainer Böhme

  • Security metrics and security investment models

    Rainer Böhme

  • Security Economics and European Policy.

    Ross J. Anderson;Rainer Böhme;Richard Clayton;Tyler Moore

  • Breaking Cauchy Model-Based JPEG Steganography with First Order Statistics

    Rainer Böhme;Andreas Westfeld

Frequent Co-Authors

Tyler Moore
Tyler Moore University of Tulsa
Jens Grossklags
Jens Grossklags Technical University of Munich
Alessandro Acquisti
Alessandro Acquisti Carnegie Mellon University
Jörg Becker
Jörg Becker University of Münster
Ross Anderson
Ross Anderson University of Cambridge
Felix C. Freiling
Felix C. Freiling University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Wouter Joosen
Wouter Joosen KU Leuven
Nicolas Christin
Nicolas Christin Carnegie Mellon University
Stefan Savage
Stefan Savage University of California, San Diego
George Danezis
George Danezis University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens many doors, but there are also flexible alternatives and related fields to consider. Online learning now makes it easier than ever to advance your education or shift your career focus—all from the comfort of your home.

For those looking for a fast track into the workforce, a 6 month associate degree online offers a quick way to earn credentials and technical skills. This pathway is ideal for entry-level roles or those wishing to upskill rapidly.

If you’re interested in management or entrepreneurship alongside technology, consider a best online business degree. These programs blend foundational business knowledge with practical skills for tech-driven industries.

Cost remains a key concern for many students. Choosing an affordable online bachelor's degree helps minimize debt while still providing access to respected qualifications.

Finally, computer science is closely linked with engineering. Pursuing an online engineering degree can help you gain problem-solving abilities valued across technology, manufacturing, and infrastructure sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Rainer Böhme

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles