World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
35
Citations
6840
World Ranking
9750
National Ranking
5153

J. Scott Saults publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. Scott Saults sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 63 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

J. Scott Saults D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. Scott Saults sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

J. Scott Saults is affiliated with the University of Missouri in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of neuroscience and psychology, with a particular focus on cognitive neuroscience and experimental and cognitive psychology subfields.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Mind wandering and attention

Saults has contributed to the academic landscape through publications in peer-reviewed journals, notably in "Developmental Psychology." Among recent papers, one key publication is titled "Developmental change in the nature of attention allocation in a dual task," published in 2020 in the journal Developmental Psychology.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Saults include:

  • Nelson Cowan
  • Angela M. AuBuchon
  • Amanda L. Gilchrist
  • Christopher L. Blume
  • Alexander P. Boone

Their research often addresses cognitive mechanisms involved in attention and memory, with a focus on how these processes develop and function under varying conditions. This includes exploration of how the brain allocates attention during multitasking situations and the behavioral outcomes associated with these cognitive functions.

Best Publications

  • On the capacity of attention: Its estimation and its role in working memory and cognitive aptitudes.

    Nelson Cowan;Emily M. Elliott;J. Scott Saults;Candice C. Morey

  • The role of verbal output time in the effects of word length on immediate memory.

    Nelson Cowan;Linda Day;J.Scott Saults;Tim A Keller

  • Scope of Attention, Control of Attention, and Intelligence in Children and Adults

    Nelson Cowan;Nathanael M. Fristoe;Emily M. Elliott;Ryan P. Brunner

  • A central capacity limit to the simultaneous storage of visual and auditory arrays in working memory.

    J. Scott Saults;Nelson Cowan

  • The Role of Attention in the Development of Short-Term Memory: Age Differences in the Verbal Span of Apprehension

    Nelson Cowan;Lara D. Nugent;Emily M. Elliott;Igor Ponomarev

  • Life-span development of visual working memory: when is feature binding difficult?

    Nelson Cowan;Moshe Naveh-Benjamin;Angela Kilb;J. Scott Saults

  • Children's Working-Memory Processes: A Response-Timing Analysis.

    Nelson Cowan;John N. Towse;Zoë Hamilton;J. Scott Saults

  • Alcohol effects on performance monitoring and adjustment: affect modulation and impairment of evaluative cognitive control.

    Bruce D. Bartholow;Erika A. Henry;Sarah A. Lust;J. Scott Saults

  • Models of Verbal Working Memory Capacity: What Does It Take to Make Them Work?

    Nelson Cowan;Jeffrey N. Rouder;Christopher L. Blume;J. Scott Saults

  • Deconfounding Serial Recall

    Nelson Cowan;J.Scott Saults;Emily M Elliott;Matthew V Moreno

  • How does running memory span work

    Michael Bunting;Nelson Cowan;J Scott Saults

  • Central and peripheral components of working memory storage.

    Nelson Cowan;J. Scott Saults;Christopher L. Blume

  • Attention to attributes and objects in working memory.

    Nelson Cowan;Christopher L. Blume;J. Scott Saults

  • Age Differences in Visual Working Memory Capacity: Not Based on Encoding Limitations

    Nelson Cowan;Angela M. AuBuchon;Amanda L. Gilchrist;Timothy J. Ricker

  • A neural region of abstract working memory

    Nelson Cowan;Dawei Li;Amanda Moffitt;Theresa M. Becker

  • Age, Self-Assessed Health Status, and Cognition

    Timothy A. Salthouse;Donald H. Kausler;J. Scott Saults

  • Differential effects of alcohol on working memory: distinguishing multiple processes.

    J. Scott Saults;Nelson Cowan;Kenneth J. Sher;Matthew V. Moreno

  • The role of absolute and relative amounts of time in forgetting within immediate memory: The case of tone-pitch comparisons

    Nelson Cowan;J. Scott Saults;Lara D. Nugent

  • Investigation of student status, background variables, and feasibility of standard tasks in cognitive aging research.

    Timothy A. Salthouse;Donald H. Kausler;J. Scott Saults

  • Can auditory memory for tone pitch be rehearsed

    Keller Ta;Cowan N;Saults Js

  • "Models of verbal working memory capacity: What does it take to make them work?": Correction to Cowan et al. (2012).

    Nelson Cowan;Jeffrey N. Rouder;Christopher L. Blume;J. Scott Saults

Frequent Co-Authors

Nelson Cowan
Nelson Cowan University of Missouri
Bruce D. Bartholow
Bruce D. Bartholow University of Missouri
Timothy A. Salthouse
Timothy A. Salthouse University of Virginia
John N. Towse
John N. Towse Lancaster University
Phillip K. Wood
Phillip K. Wood University of Missouri
Kenneth J. Sher
Kenneth J. Sher University of Missouri
Jeffrey N. Rouder
Jeffrey N. Rouder University of California, Irvine
Akira Miyake
Akira Miyake University of Colorado Boulder
Gordon D. A. Brown
Gordon D. A. Brown University of Warwick
Andrew R. A. Conway
Andrew R. A. Conway Claremont Graduate University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology can open doors to various career pathways, particularly in counseling and mental health services. Online degree programs provide flexible, accessible options for students across the USA to prepare for rewarding roles in counseling, therapy, and support services.

Many students are interested in the popular counseling programs in Arizona, which offer specialized tracks in school counseling, clinical counseling, and marriage and family therapy. California is another hotbed for aspiring counselors, thanks to the top-ranked counseling degree programs in California that are renowned for their academic rigor.

For those closer to Illinois or looking at big-city opportunities, the most popular counseling degree programs in Chicago emphasize both theory and hands-on experience in urban environments. Coloradans can benefit from the top-ranked counseling degree programs in Colorado, which focus on integrating mental health counseling with community outreach.

Whether your interest lies in clinical practice, research, or advocacy, the right online program can help you build a strong foundation for a meaningful psychology career.

Best Scientists Citing J. Scott Saults

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles