World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
61
Citations
12714
World Ranking
3411
National Ranking
43

Neuroscience

D-Index
61
Citations
12749
World Ranking
3690
National Ranking
39

Steve Majerus publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steve Majerus sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 414 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Steve Majerus D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steve Majerus sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Steve Majerus is affiliated with the University of Liège in Belgium and has produced extensive research primarily within the domains of neuroscience and psychology. Their work centers on cognitive neuroscience and developmental aspects of psychology, with a significant number of publications addressing neural and behavioral psychology studies, language neurobiology, and memory processes.

Their research spans multiple main fields of study, including:

  • Neuroscience
  • Psychology

Within these broader fields, subfields of particular focus include:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics
  • Statistics and Probability

Majerus has contributed to several main topics of research interest, notably:

  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Reading and Literacy Development
  • Memory Processes and Influences
  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research

The scientist has published research in various journals and proceedings, with frequent publications appearing in:

  • Memory & Cognition
  • Psychologica Belgica
  • Cognition
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Steve Majerus include:

  • "Mind blanking is a distinct mental state linked to a recurrent brain profile of globally positive connectivity during ongoing mentation" (2022), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Brain Metabolism but Not Gray Matter Volume Underlies the Presence of Language Function in the Minimally Conscious State (MCS): MCS+ Versus MCS− Neuroimaging Differences" (2020), Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
  • "The varying nature of semantic effects in working memory" (2020), Cognition
  • "Residual implicit and explicit language abilities in patients with disorders of consciousness: A systematic review" (2021), Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • "Search for hep solar neutrinos and the diffuse supernova neutrino background using all three phases of the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory" (2020), Physical Review D

Collaborative work features frequent co-authors such as:

  • Lucie Attout
  • Charlène Aubinet
  • Nathan Leroy
  • Coline Grégoire
  • Camille Chatelle

Steve Majerus has also contributed to academic literature through book publications, including the title "Traité de neuropsychologie de l'enfant" published by De Boeck Supérieur eBooks in 2020.

Best Publications

  • Diagnostic accuracy of the vegetative and minimally conscious state: Clinical consensus versus standardized neurobehavioral assessment

    Caroline Schnakers;Audrey Vanhaudenhuyse;Joseph Giacino;Manfredi Ventura

  • Mind-wandering: phenomenology and function as assessed with a novel experience sampling method.

    David Stawarczyk;Steve Majerus;Michalina Maj;Martial Van der Linden;Martial Van der Linden

  • Neural Correlates of Ongoing Conscious Experience: Both Task-Unrelatedness and Stimulus-Independence Are Related to Default Network Activity

    David Stawarczyk;Steve Majerus;Pierre Maquet;Arnaud D'Argembeau

  • Voluntary brain processing in disorders of consciousness

    Caroline Schnakers;F. Perrin;M. Schabus;Steve Majerus

  • Behavioral evaluation of consciousness in severe brain damage.

    Steve Majerus;Helen Gill-Thwaites;Keith Andrews;Steven Laureys

  • Functional neuroanatomy underlying the clinical subcategorization of minimally conscious state patients.

    Marie-Aurélie Bruno;Steve Majerus;Mélanie Boly;Audrey Vanhaudenhuyse

  • Cerebral processing in the minimally conscious state

    Steven Laureys;Fabien Perrin;Marie Faymonville;Caroline Schnakers

  • The neural basis of personal goal processing when envisioning future events

    Arnaud D'Argembeau;David Stawarczyk;Steve Majerus;Fabienne Collette

  • The Nociception Coma Scale: a new tool to assess nociception in disorders of consciousness.

    Caroline Schnakers;Camille Chatelle;Audrey Vanhaudenhuyse;Steve Majerus

  • Relations between vocabulary development and verbal short-term memory: The relative importance of short-term memory for serial order and item information.

    Steve Majerus;Martine Poncelet;Christelle Greffe;Martial Van der Linden;Martial Van der Linden

  • A French validation study of the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R)

    Caroline Schnakers;Steve Majerus;Joseph Giacino;Audrey Vanhaudenhuyse

  • The commonality of neural networks for verbal and visual short-term memory

    Steve Majerus;Arnaud D'Argembeau;Trecy Martinez Perez;Sanaâ Belayachi

  • Self-reflection across time: cortical midline structures differentiate between present and past selves

    Arnaud D’Argembeau;Dorothée Feyers;Steve Majerus;Fabienne Collette

  • Language repetition and short-term memory: an integrative framework

    Steve Majerus

  • Using the daydreaming frequency scale to investigate the relationships between mind-wandering, psychological well-being, and present-moment awareness

    David Stawarczyk;Steve Majerus;Martial Van der Linden;Martial Van der Linden;Arnaud D'Argembeau

  • Detecting consciousness in a total Locked-in syndrome: an active event related paradigm

    Caroline Schnakers;Fabien Perrin;Manuel Schabus;Roland Hustinx

  • Cognitive function in the locked-in syndrome

    Caroline Schnakers;Steve Majerus;Serge Goldman;Melanie Boly

  • The left intraparietal sulcus and verbal short-term memory: focus of attention or serial order?

    S. Majerus;M. Poncelet;M. Van der Linden;M. Van der Linden;G. Albouy

  • A sensitive scale to assess nociceptive pain in patients with disorders of consciousness

    Camille Chatelle;Steve Majerus;John Whyte;Steven Laureys

  • Finding the answer in space: the mental whiteboard hypothesis on serial order in working memory.

    Elger Abrahamse;Jean-Philippe van Dijck;Steve Majerus;Wim Fias

  • Lexical learning in bilingual adults: the relative importance of short-term memory for serial order and phonological knowledge.

    Steve Majerus;Martine Poncelet;Martial Van der Linden;Martial Van der Linden;Brendan S. Weekes

Frequent Co-Authors

Martial Van der Linden
Martial Van der Linden University of Geneva
Steven Laureys
Steven Laureys University of Liège
Eric Salmon
Eric Salmon University of Liège
Fabienne Collette
Fabienne Collette University of Liège
Arnaud D'Argembeau
Arnaud D'Argembeau University of Liège
Mélanie Boly
Mélanie Boly University of Wisconsin–Madison
Audrey Vanhaudenhuyse
Audrey Vanhaudenhuyse University of Liège
Pierre Maquet
Pierre Maquet University of Liège
Marie-Aurélie Bruno
Marie-Aurélie Bruno University of Liège
Camille Chatelle
Camille Chatelle Harvard Medical School

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology can open many doors in the mental health field. Online degrees in psychology and counseling make it easier to begin or advance your career on your own schedule. Many institutions offer programs that meet different state requirements, so it’s crucial to understand the pathways specific to your location.

Each state often has its own educational, licensing, and internship requirements for aspiring counselors. For example, those looking to become a mental health counselor in Nashville must complete a recognized graduate program and supervised clinical hours. Similarly, New Orleans mental health counselor education requirements include state-approved degrees and passing national examinations.

If you are wondering how to become a mental health counselor in New York City, expect a rigorous process involving postgraduate study, ongoing supervision, and specific licensing exams. Meanwhile, mental health counselor requirements in Newark emphasize a blend of accredited education and practical clinical training.

Online programs are designed to align with state standards, helping students pursue their chosen career path in various locations across the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Steve Majerus

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles